This...also read any of the 66 Books and compare any of them to an "other" book. They do NOT read the same way....It's apparent they had a different author.
If we put aside the idea that angels had relations with women who else could be the Sons of God in Geneses chapter 6?
I thought that maybe Adam And Eve had many children before they ate from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil. After all one of the results from eating from that tree was an increase in pain during childbirth.
An increase compared to what if there were no children before?
The children born before the fall would have been sinless still. Those could easily have been the men of God that chapter 6 refers to.
Their seed would have been different then the corrupt seed of fallen man.
It's not in the Bible, but Jude did quote Enoch in his epistle and called Enoch a prophet.
The “other books” you speak of were not considered authoritative and they differed greatly in their theology and doctrines.
They do provide some interesting backstory to some biblical stories (like Gen 6 “sons of God” and the Nephilim), none the less.
This...also read any of the 66 Books and compare any of them to an "other" book. They do NOT read the same way....It's apparent they had a different author.
If we put aside the idea that angels had relations with women who else could be the Sons of God in Geneses chapter 6?
I thought that maybe Adam And Eve had many children before they ate from the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil. After all one of the results from eating from that tree was an increase in pain during childbirth. An increase compared to what if there were no children before?
The children born before the fall would have been sinless still. Those could easily have been the men of God that chapter 6 refers to.
Their seed would have been different then the corrupt seed of fallen man.