I don’t want legal protection from discrimination. I respect other private individuals’ right to discriminate against me.
“legal protection against discrimination” = unnecessary and violent government middlemen meddling in other people’s private decisions.
Maybe some whites find it refreshing for these white victims’ killer to be charged with a hate crime for once, but I don’t. Interpreting events through the opinions of the suspect is dubious, so the law should just judge actions, not opinions. The penalty for two first degree murders should be sky high whether he killed them because he hated their race or because he coveted the nickels in their pockets.
“legal system to give whites legal protection against discrimination”
Ok, that’s different from what I first interpreted, and I agree with it. Government functions such as the legal system should protect against discrimination, with lady justice being blind and all being equal before the law and all that. I was thinking that personal discrimination is a human right. Legal protection from discrimination for gays turned into a Christian baker becoming no longer free to exercise his God given right to live by his conscience.
You’ve shown ability for spotting scams so you had me wondering for a minute if you missed this twist on the “hate” legislation scam, perhaps because this twist targets whites. Just like 20 years ago when all of the supposedly anti-radical-muslim stuff was really intended to be anti-Christian-American, this hate crime charge for white victims is to trick white people into supporting hate legislation. Then as soon as enough people support it, it will be steroided up and turned on whites, who would be forevermore banned from mentioning misdeeds of nonwhites. But after the clarification, I think you have a good handle on the hate crime and hate speech issue.
I don’t want legal protection from discrimination. I respect other private individuals’ right to discriminate against me.
“legal protection against discrimination” = unnecessary and violent government middlemen meddling in other people’s private decisions.
Maybe some whites find it refreshing for these white victims’ killer to be charged with a hate crime for once, but I don’t. Interpreting events through the opinions of the suspect is dubious, so the law should just judge actions, not opinions. The penalty for two first degree murders should be sky high whether he killed them because he hated their race or because he coveted the nickels in their pockets.
I agree.
Keep this in mind. The problem with race relations has never been the general population.
It's always been "Activist" groups that tend to force the issue. This is because there is always some hidden agenda associated with it.
Racial activist groups like BLM have always hidden behind legal protection.
We have to remove their legal advantage that put whites in a no-win situation.
Even though I am not white. I do understand white frustration with minority groups.
A lot of whites feel cornered with no options to fight back.
This is why Trump is so important.
Trump is teaching both whites and minority groups how to balance things out via the legal system.
Notice how Trump has painted Letisha James as "Racist". Here is a white man calling a black woman racist.
This dynamic is very important for whites. When Trump calls a black woman racist.
It's going to put pressure on the legal system to give whites legal protection against discrimination.
As more whites file and win civil rights cases.
Activist groups like BLM cannot survive long term.
“legal system to give whites legal protection against discrimination”
Ok, that’s different from what I first interpreted, and I agree with it. Government functions such as the legal system should protect against discrimination, with lady justice being blind and all being equal before the law and all that. I was thinking that personal discrimination is a human right. Legal protection from discrimination for gays turned into a Christian baker becoming no longer free to exercise his God given right to live by his conscience.
You’ve shown ability for spotting scams so you had me wondering for a minute if you missed this twist on the “hate” legislation scam, perhaps because this twist targets whites. Just like 20 years ago when all of the supposedly anti-radical-muslim stuff was really intended to be anti-Christian-American, this hate crime charge for white victims is to trick white people into supporting hate legislation. Then as soon as enough people support it, it will be steroided up and turned on whites, who would be forevermore banned from mentioning misdeeds of nonwhites. But after the clarification, I think you have a good handle on the hate crime and hate speech issue.
No problem.
I use to argue with my cousin about this issue. Her defense was "We can't be racist because we don't have the power".
The whole racial activist movement uses this mindset for everything.
I am preaching to all of my white friends. Let them push this anti-white narrative.
Trump is the difference-maker here.
He understands marketing and sales.
He knows how to fight back against "Anti-White" hate using the correct messaging.
Here is what I learned about Truth.
Truth only has value if communicate it correctly.