During Obama's transition, a group of FDA scientists approached his transition team to let them know they had been wanting to warn women of the dangers of mammograms for years. Unfortunately, the honest scientists are more afraid of the dishonest scientists, than the dishonest scientists are afraid of the honest scientist. Of course nothing was done. The mammograms are just like the fake vax. These evil people prey on the victims fears, and then thinking they are protecting themselves from the disease, they do the very thing that causes the disease! It's very sad!
But those who are not corrupted say women should not get mammograms without very high and specific justification for suspicion of a problem. It is a racket and just one more way to terrorize women.
Yep I think it’s more the turbo cancer since so many chose to take the immune system shut off injections there is going to be more younger women with cancers and more often.
About 10 years ago, I went for a mammogram for the last time. 35 Minutes past my appointment time, I got the feeling that I should leave and never return. I'd never waited more than 10 minutes before, and the desk clerk gave no explanation for the wait and did not offer to reschedule anyone. She was pretty rude when I told her that I was leaving and would not reschedule. As a retired nurse, some people are shocked at my decisions to no longer drink the kool-aid.
Two of my sister in laws got breast cancer before age 40. One died. The second was diagnosed because I forced her to get a mammogram. Then they found out they have the BRCA2 mutation. Mammograms did not cause the cancer because it was discovered with their first mammogram. They did not suffer from pancake boobs as someone shared because they had double mastectomies and complete hysterectomies.
just one more reason to avoid these systems that don’t give a fuck about you. My wife has seen through the bullshit and cancelled hers. You dont need to go see Dr Baffled for anything. Remember, they all advocated and asked for you to get the jab - why ever go back?
Of the 6 friends that have had breast cancer, atvleast 3 had a mammogram that MISSED HUGE LUMPS!
1 friend is an RN and found her cancer on self exam---6 days AFTER mammogram
MRI much more accurate
Yeah, well, this isn't a new debate. The old standard was for women to get annual screenings after 40. Then some bean counter did a study and found exactly what you just said. There's a risk of cancer from the x-ray exposure that comes with the mammogram itself. When you calculate out the risk from new cancers induced by the screenings and weigh that against the number of cancers you'd detect early with the mammograms, they argued that the statistics showed more harm than good until the age of 50.
Normally, this would be an academic discussion in some medical conference that's about as entertaining as watching paint dry unless you're an oncologist. But, it made news and women screamed bloody murder because "news" people never deal in numbers. They sell fear. And so, the American Cancer Society followed the science and changed their recommendations.
And now, we've got a different body, the USPSTF (US Preventative Services Task Force) swinging back in the opposite direction. This happens all the time, especially when you've got different groups giving the recommendations. We did this over the past 5 or so years with baby aspirins to prevent first occurrences of heart attacks and strokes too. The American Heart Association said one thing. USPSTF said another. Now, they're closer to the same page. We've had debates like this with colonoscopies to screen for colon cancer when the gastroenterologists and the oncologists disagree. That's how medicine works. Real science is never actually settled.
Link to the USPSTF's draft recommendations. Public comment period is open. These aren't even official yet, so let's not lose our minds like the Left does.
You left out the part about parties with a vested interest lobbying these bodies for certain standards to be set that benefit their business. When they fail with one body they move on to the next one until they get the 'finding' they want.
Mostly benign, but you have to go through another whole series of tests to know for sure. I do not do all the diagnostic testing they suggest. I am still alive. HA!
I saw a study a few years ago that found 80%+ of breast cancer treatment turned out to be not cancerous. So they are "treating" any thing they can see or feel. Ridiculous!
That moment you realize mammography actually promotes cancer...oh and pancake boobs
During Obama's transition, a group of FDA scientists approached his transition team to let them know they had been wanting to warn women of the dangers of mammograms for years. Unfortunately, the honest scientists are more afraid of the dishonest scientists, than the dishonest scientists are afraid of the honest scientist. Of course nothing was done. The mammograms are just like the fake vax. These evil people prey on the victims fears, and then thinking they are protecting themselves from the disease, they do the very thing that causes the disease! It's very sad!
You walk into a RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT to get seen for a BREAST CANCER checkup Irony at its finest
That was my theory when peers lectured me on getting them. When I told them they thought I was crazy.
But those who are not corrupted say women should not get mammograms without very high and specific justification for suspicion of a problem. It is a racket and just one more way to terrorize women.
Thermal imaging is the thing to do IF answers are needed.
Does anybody trust the US health system anymore?
ALL supposed 'health screenings' are the mechanism to trigger their business model. Period.
But is this also showing the turbo cancer rise?
Yep I think it’s more the turbo cancer since so many chose to take the immune system shut off injections there is going to be more younger women with cancers and more often.
There's a reason they call it the Healthcare "Industry".
Shhhhhh..... mammograms = cancer.
About 10 years ago, I went for a mammogram for the last time. 35 Minutes past my appointment time, I got the feeling that I should leave and never return. I'd never waited more than 10 minutes before, and the desk clerk gave no explanation for the wait and did not offer to reschedule anyone. She was pretty rude when I told her that I was leaving and would not reschedule. As a retired nurse, some people are shocked at my decisions to no longer drink the kool-aid.
I’m with you , I’ve only had one in my life . For the past 20 or more years I’m tormented by phone calls ,, I refuse to ever get another one !
Have not and will not.
EVER.......
Thermograms are a great alternative.
Two of my sister in laws got breast cancer before age 40. One died. The second was diagnosed because I forced her to get a mammogram. Then they found out they have the BRCA2 mutation. Mammograms did not cause the cancer because it was discovered with their first mammogram. They did not suffer from pancake boobs as someone shared because they had double mastectomies and complete hysterectomies.
just one more reason to avoid these systems that don’t give a fuck about you. My wife has seen through the bullshit and cancelled hers. You dont need to go see Dr Baffled for anything. Remember, they all advocated and asked for you to get the jab - why ever go back?
The great fondling continues...
Of the 6 friends that have had breast cancer, atvleast 3 had a mammogram that MISSED HUGE LUMPS! 1 friend is an RN and found her cancer on self exam---6 days AFTER mammogram MRI much more accurate
Yeah, well, this isn't a new debate. The old standard was for women to get annual screenings after 40. Then some bean counter did a study and found exactly what you just said. There's a risk of cancer from the x-ray exposure that comes with the mammogram itself. When you calculate out the risk from new cancers induced by the screenings and weigh that against the number of cancers you'd detect early with the mammograms, they argued that the statistics showed more harm than good until the age of 50.
Normally, this would be an academic discussion in some medical conference that's about as entertaining as watching paint dry unless you're an oncologist. But, it made news and women screamed bloody murder because "news" people never deal in numbers. They sell fear. And so, the American Cancer Society followed the science and changed their recommendations.
And now, we've got a different body, the USPSTF (US Preventative Services Task Force) swinging back in the opposite direction. This happens all the time, especially when you've got different groups giving the recommendations. We did this over the past 5 or so years with baby aspirins to prevent first occurrences of heart attacks and strokes too. The American Heart Association said one thing. USPSTF said another. Now, they're closer to the same page. We've had debates like this with colonoscopies to screen for colon cancer when the gastroenterologists and the oncologists disagree. That's how medicine works. Real science is never actually settled.
Link to the USPSTF's draft recommendations. Public comment period is open. These aren't even official yet, so let's not lose our minds like the Left does.
You left out the part about parties with a vested interest lobbying these bodies for certain standards to be set that benefit their business. When they fail with one body they move on to the next one until they get the 'finding' they want.
The more you look for, the more you find.
Mostly benign, but you have to go through another whole series of tests to know for sure. I do not do all the diagnostic testing they suggest. I am still alive. HA!
I saw a study a few years ago that found 80%+ of breast cancer treatment turned out to be not cancerous. So they are "treating" any thing they can see or feel. Ridiculous!