Hmm. Looking around at other ancient civilizations and feeling a little skeptical at the assertion that either angels or demons were not mentioned before 1500 BC. Lilith, who may or may not have been regarded as a demon in the earliest days, is mentioned in Tablet XII of the Epic of Gilgamesh which is earlier than 2100 BC. The Chinese have a 5000 year history and more ghosts and demons than you can shake a holy relic at, but I can't find a early date: however the great number makes me think they had the idea long ago. The earliest mentioned of the asuras is about 1500 BC in the Indus Valley. Asuras were demons there and angels elsewhere, but either way they affected humans. Predating everyone were the Sky Father God and nature spirits, those were both very widespread beliefs. Maybe there were competing aliens briefly visiting around then.
Lilith is also mentioned in the pre-1964 Jerusalem Bible. It is the only bible that Isaiah 34:14 mentions the name Lilith. As I've gotten older, I've watched how Bibles are being published where the changing of the words and their meaning, along with entire elimination of words, are being made. This seems to be increasing. You'll find that all Masorete texts (protestant bibles) have taken this out. Even the New Jerusalem Bible has done the same. The KJV uses the words "screech owl". But, if you look this up in Strong's Concordance reference (H2917), there the word Lilith is found and it's meaning.
Now, why would that word be hidden from us? It appears to be because it provides us insight to valuable history that 'certain' entities may not want us to know. The effect of erasing history is so that it is repeated. The story of Lilith, according to the alphabet of ben sira: the source of the famous "first Eve" story tells us where this story derives. The excerpt from the prologue to Epic of Gilgamesh contains what may be the earliest reference to Lilith or to one of her predecessors. Where else do you find the story of Lilith? You find it in the Jewish Midrash, Babylonian Talmud. In "The Encyclopaedia of Religion" Lilith is identified in Judaism as a female demon who seduces men and kills unsuspecting children. In the Babylonian Talmud Lilith is portrayed as havinga woman's face, long hair ('Eruv. 100b), and wings (Nid. 24b) like the cherubim. Her identity as demon is underscored in Bava' Bashtra' 73a, referring to the demon Hormiz or Ormuzd as Lilith's son, and in Shabbat 171b, where men are warned against sleeping alone lest they be seized by Lilith.
Make of this as you will. This belief was very popular during Isaiah's time. And I believe the promotion of it today and its worship is far more pervasive than people realize. What was practiced then is being practiced today. Who is behind it all?
Be that as it may, the premise of the OP was that the world was both demon and angel free prior to 1500 BC, based apparently only on Mesopotamia evidence. I don't believe it. First, the episodes up to Joseph going to Egypt, if you believe in that cosmology, predate 1500 BC, they already had a tempter and angels. Later there was a monotheistic, widespread religion called Tengrism, based on a spirit sky father, but it was syncretic like most and had many added spirit beings. It also appears that there was a monotheism in China about 2300 BC. The fundamentals of Hinduism were around in 1500 BC and included spirits analogous to angels and demons. The relationship of these developments isn't clear, the Indus Valley civilization was progressing right along with the Mesopotamian.
Second, while the earlier deduced Proto-Indo European belief system from which
Tengrism probably came featured fairly neutral deities, I don't believe any religion in the world went on very long without a moral gradient developing among the heavenlies. It seems inevitable that an Evil One arises and a dualistic conflict develops. When the two moral sides develop, so do their supporters, angels and demons.
Now OP's thesis doesn't appeal to me, but suppose he is right that there was some sudden change in the world. Why would we be invaded by demons? This seems to be veering into "Gods are aliens" territory. I can believe aliens would be interpreted that way, but the evidence is still pretty slim.
Good, interesting response. I tend to agree with you. It doesn't appeal to me either. We don't know the exact timeline for anything "Genesis', yet we can assess that the fall of angels (demons) from heaven occurred both before Adam and after..... It's possible that angels falling from heaven occur even today. We simply don't know, but we can't deny this possibility either.
I don't know if you got a chance to see my post on demons a little while ago. It is found here:
In this posting, it examines the rather sudden change we are seeing in the world around us and how widespread demon influence and possession actually is. We are nearing the precipice, to which Christians are now openly being attacked, while at the same time the evil-doers are protected. I have tried for over 20 years to warn as many people I could of the coming tyranny. After observing the astounding organization of sodomists in society, it reminded me of what historians tell us about the widespread homosexuality practiced in ancient Spartan culture. Then, after reading Louis Marschalko's "The World Conquerors", I knew then America was in danger of becoming the new post-WWII Eastern Europe. Here is what I wrote in 2014 about this:
"The hidden history is that transsexuals, sodomists, and lesbians were sought out by the Bolsheviks to serve as commissars in post-WWII Eastern Europe to oppress the Christian majority. Why the Christian majority? It was recognized that Western civilization was based on Christian morality. To destroy a culture, it's religious mores must be turned on its head and destroyed. By taking the abject social outcasts of Christian society and promoting them to positions of power, the Bolsheviks knew that they could exact revenge against their eternal enemy, Christianity."
"On more than a 1000 pages, a censored document called the "Sudeten German White Papers" records the many horrors with full details, horrors for which there is no precedent in the history of mankind.
Six hundred thousand Sudeten Germans were killed during the massacres of the death camps in Czechoslovakia. The documents record in specificity that armed Czech women, many being transsexuals, lesbian, and sodomists continued beating the wombs of expecting mothers with truncheons until a miscarriage followed, and in one camp alone 10 women died each day in this way (Document No. 6). In another camp, inmates were forced to lick up the bespattered brains of their fellow-prisoners who had been beaten to death. Prisoners were forced to lick up infectious feces from the underwear of their fellow-prisoners suffering from dysentery (Document No. 17). Doctors were disallowed to provide medical aid to the brutally raped and sodomized men and women. In Brno, 275 women committed suicide in a single day to escape the unfolding reign of terror.
Czechoslovakia wasn't the only country where the transsexual, sodomist, and lesbian commissars were used for revenge against Christendom, Similar accounts are found though out Eastern Europe. Some 30,000 died in camps in Hungary along with 200,000 Sudeten Germans, where powdered glass was mixed with the children's food. Shortly after armistice, when the great humanitarian, the "bel esprit" and Zio-Bolshevik Edward Benes entered Prague on Sunday, May 13th, 1945, German Christians were burned alive in honor in St. Wenceslas Square (Document No. 15). Many Christians were hung up by their feet from the big advertising posters symbolizing the Luciferian inverted crucifix in St. Wenceslas Square, then the great humanitarian approached their petrol-soaked bodies were set on fire to form living torches.
Some of these records are presented here as a startling revelation of the transsexual, lesbian, and homosexual hatred of Christianity. The prevailing lesbian psychological characteristic is that they hate males. Sodomists and transsexuals have utter contempt for Christianity.
Is the United States beginning to repeat the horrifying acts of the Bolshevik revolution? It is not a mere coincidence that the Neocons, who now dominate in the political offices of Washington, were originally Bolsheviks. Dissatisfied with their progress of revolution, they repackaged their ideology and abandoned the socialist-based platform of the Democratic Party and moved to the Republican Party.
I do not state this lightly. The United States is repeating the history witnessed in Eastern Europe. Public outrage must be voiced to stop this from reoccurring."
We have seen the adverse effects of hormone and psychotropic drugs causing repeated, sudden episodes of impulsive, aggressive, violent behavior or angry verbal outbursts that is occurring in the endemic spread of transsexualism and school shootings. It's if the demons have been released from their bondage and are now carrying out their revenge against Christians.
I am presently in the finishing up an article how UFOs and the UBE (extraterrial alien) presence ties in to all of this. Just know the Diabolical One is real and is mustering up a very formidable flesh and blood army that is demonic at its core.
Another general agreement in religions is that there are (at least) two realities, the physical one we are living in and a spiritual or transcendental one (or maybe several). The two are not wholly independent but there are rules or barriers limiting movement between. Gods can (usually) pass freely and be effective in both: practically a defining quality of a god. Otherwise even their minions have some limits, e.g. demons can only go where they are invited, angels go where they are sent, and lowly humans see visions with supervision. I can believe in aliens, yet that is another can of worms. If there is an omnipotent God, then the aliens must also be subject to his rules. Do they also rebel and cause spiritual turmoil?
That's when monotheism began with zoroastrianism. Maybe the problem lies within the monotheistic stream then. They needed a foil to explain the bad things.
My main argument rests in the idea that if Adam and Eve were indeed the first humans, then they knew there was only one God, for they walked with Him in the Garden. They definitely would’ve passed that belief on to their children. We see evidence of this in the story of Cain and Able offering their sacrifices to that same God. As time progressed Polytheism would’ve crept in, especially in the post diluvian world, where we see a lot of evidence of polytheism in the nations that rose to power during that time.
There is evidence of monotheistic beliefs and practices in ancient Egypt, for example, where pharaoh Akhenaten established worship of the sun-disk Aten as the sole god in the mid-14th century BCE. Similarly, the ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism, which dates back to the 6th century BCE, features the worship of a single god, Ahura Mazda.
But akhenaten changed it from the polytheistic pantheon after zoroastrianism began around 1500 B.C. as I said in my post you replied to in the first place.
I would agree with you in that any early post diluvian civilization would be heavily polytheistic. But would you agree that this era is not the beginning of Human history? Almost all of these ancient civilizations speak of a catastrophic flood where only a few survived. That much is historical.
Well, the family(s) that survived that flood would’ve had intimate knowledge of the world prior to that flood and would’ve most likely passed some of those stories on through their Oral traditions - much like the majority of ancient history back then.
Of the ancient records/stories we do possess, someone had to get it right, yes?
many "polytheists" understood their various gods as various expressions of one original source. early ancient egyptians had this understanding, but it was not preserved.
Nut is a daughter of Shu and Tefnut. Her brother and husband is Geb. She had four children; Osiris, Set, Isis, and Nephthys. She is considered one of the oldest deities among the Egyptian pantheon, with her origin being found in the creation story of Heliopolis. She was originally the goddess of the nighttime sky but eventually became referred to as simply the sky goddess. Her headdress was the hieroglyphic of part of her name, a pot, which may also symbolize the uterus. Mostly depicted in nude human form, Nut was also sometimes depicted in the form of a cow whose great body formed the sky and heavens, a sycamore tree, or as a giant sow, suckling many piglets.
maybe you shouldn't expect to be able to compare man to God so directly? or maybe you are misunderstanding what plays the role of the mother in Christian theology. the Bible says Eve was created from the rib of Adam. that's not how girls are made either, but that doesn't mean its a blunder or meaningless.
It is funny that the Woke use the same pronouns as the demons do in the bible.
Hmm. Looking around at other ancient civilizations and feeling a little skeptical at the assertion that either angels or demons were not mentioned before 1500 BC. Lilith, who may or may not have been regarded as a demon in the earliest days, is mentioned in Tablet XII of the Epic of Gilgamesh which is earlier than 2100 BC. The Chinese have a 5000 year history and more ghosts and demons than you can shake a holy relic at, but I can't find a early date: however the great number makes me think they had the idea long ago. The earliest mentioned of the asuras is about 1500 BC in the Indus Valley. Asuras were demons there and angels elsewhere, but either way they affected humans. Predating everyone were the Sky Father God and nature spirits, those were both very widespread beliefs. Maybe there were competing aliens briefly visiting around then.
Lilith is also mentioned in the pre-1964 Jerusalem Bible. It is the only bible that Isaiah 34:14 mentions the name Lilith. As I've gotten older, I've watched how Bibles are being published where the changing of the words and their meaning, along with entire elimination of words, are being made. This seems to be increasing. You'll find that all Masorete texts (protestant bibles) have taken this out. Even the New Jerusalem Bible has done the same. The KJV uses the words "screech owl". But, if you look this up in Strong's Concordance reference (H2917), there the word Lilith is found and it's meaning.
Now, why would that word be hidden from us? It appears to be because it provides us insight to valuable history that 'certain' entities may not want us to know. The effect of erasing history is so that it is repeated. The story of Lilith, according to the alphabet of ben sira: the source of the famous "first Eve" story tells us where this story derives. The excerpt from the prologue to Epic of Gilgamesh contains what may be the earliest reference to Lilith or to one of her predecessors. Where else do you find the story of Lilith? You find it in the Jewish Midrash, Babylonian Talmud. In "The Encyclopaedia of Religion" Lilith is identified in Judaism as a female demon who seduces men and kills unsuspecting children. In the Babylonian Talmud Lilith is portrayed as havinga woman's face, long hair ('Eruv. 100b), and wings (Nid. 24b) like the cherubim. Her identity as demon is underscored in Bava' Bashtra' 73a, referring to the demon Hormiz or Ormuzd as Lilith's son, and in Shabbat 171b, where men are warned against sleeping alone lest they be seized by Lilith.
Make of this as you will. This belief was very popular during Isaiah's time. And I believe the promotion of it today and its worship is far more pervasive than people realize. What was practiced then is being practiced today. Who is behind it all?
Be that as it may, the premise of the OP was that the world was both demon and angel free prior to 1500 BC, based apparently only on Mesopotamia evidence. I don't believe it. First, the episodes up to Joseph going to Egypt, if you believe in that cosmology, predate 1500 BC, they already had a tempter and angels. Later there was a monotheistic, widespread religion called Tengrism, based on a spirit sky father, but it was syncretic like most and had many added spirit beings. It also appears that there was a monotheism in China about 2300 BC. The fundamentals of Hinduism were around in 1500 BC and included spirits analogous to angels and demons. The relationship of these developments isn't clear, the Indus Valley civilization was progressing right along with the Mesopotamian.
Second, while the earlier deduced Proto-Indo European belief system from which Tengrism probably came featured fairly neutral deities, I don't believe any religion in the world went on very long without a moral gradient developing among the heavenlies. It seems inevitable that an Evil One arises and a dualistic conflict develops. When the two moral sides develop, so do their supporters, angels and demons.
Now OP's thesis doesn't appeal to me, but suppose he is right that there was some sudden change in the world. Why would we be invaded by demons? This seems to be veering into "Gods are aliens" territory. I can believe aliens would be interpreted that way, but the evidence is still pretty slim.
Good, interesting response. I tend to agree with you. It doesn't appeal to me either. We don't know the exact timeline for anything "Genesis', yet we can assess that the fall of angels (demons) from heaven occurred both before Adam and after..... It's possible that angels falling from heaven occur even today. We simply don't know, but we can't deny this possibility either.
I don't know if you got a chance to see my post on demons a little while ago. It is found here:
"On Transsexuals, Influences of Demons Serving the Diabolical One-- Q4402, Q812 and Q1269 Part 1". and,
"On Transsexuals, Influences of Demons Serving the Diabolical One-- Q4402, Q812 and Q1269 Part 2".
In this posting, it examines the rather sudden change we are seeing in the world around us and how widespread demon influence and possession actually is. We are nearing the precipice, to which Christians are now openly being attacked, while at the same time the evil-doers are protected. I have tried for over 20 years to warn as many people I could of the coming tyranny. After observing the astounding organization of sodomists in society, it reminded me of what historians tell us about the widespread homosexuality practiced in ancient Spartan culture. Then, after reading Louis Marschalko's "The World Conquerors", I knew then America was in danger of becoming the new post-WWII Eastern Europe. Here is what I wrote in 2014 about this:
"The hidden history is that transsexuals, sodomists, and lesbians were sought out by the Bolsheviks to serve as commissars in post-WWII Eastern Europe to oppress the Christian majority. Why the Christian majority? It was recognized that Western civilization was based on Christian morality. To destroy a culture, it's religious mores must be turned on its head and destroyed. By taking the abject social outcasts of Christian society and promoting them to positions of power, the Bolsheviks knew that they could exact revenge against their eternal enemy, Christianity."
We have seen the adverse effects of hormone and psychotropic drugs causing repeated, sudden episodes of impulsive, aggressive, violent behavior or angry verbal outbursts that is occurring in the endemic spread of transsexualism and school shootings. It's if the demons have been released from their bondage and are now carrying out their revenge against Christians.
I am presently in the finishing up an article how UFOs and the UBE (extraterrial alien) presence ties in to all of this. Just know the Diabolical One is real and is mustering up a very formidable flesh and blood army that is demonic at its core.
Another general agreement in religions is that there are (at least) two realities, the physical one we are living in and a spiritual or transcendental one (or maybe several). The two are not wholly independent but there are rules or barriers limiting movement between. Gods can (usually) pass freely and be effective in both: practically a defining quality of a god. Otherwise even their minions have some limits, e.g. demons can only go where they are invited, angels go where they are sent, and lowly humans see visions with supervision. I can believe in aliens, yet that is another can of worms. If there is an omnipotent God, then the aliens must also be subject to his rules. Do they also rebel and cause spiritual turmoil?
Interestingly enough, the only person in the Bible who addressed the issue of demons, was Messiah. It all kind of disappeared after that.
That's when monotheism began with zoroastrianism. Maybe the problem lies within the monotheistic stream then. They needed a foil to explain the bad things.
Monotheism started at the beginning of time and devolved into Polytheism. I will die on this hill.
Doesn't seem that way to me. Egypt for example.
My main argument rests in the idea that if Adam and Eve were indeed the first humans, then they knew there was only one God, for they walked with Him in the Garden. They definitely would’ve passed that belief on to their children. We see evidence of this in the story of Cain and Able offering their sacrifices to that same God. As time progressed Polytheism would’ve crept in, especially in the post diluvian world, where we see a lot of evidence of polytheism in the nations that rose to power during that time.
There is no way to confirm this hebrew tale though. It's not historical.
How about Enoch? Do you think he was a Historical figure?
Doubtful. An antediluvian mythical figure?
Awesome username! Old school Soundgarden! 😎👍
There is evidence of monotheistic beliefs and practices in ancient Egypt, for example, where pharaoh Akhenaten established worship of the sun-disk Aten as the sole god in the mid-14th century BCE. Similarly, the ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism, which dates back to the 6th century BCE, features the worship of a single god, Ahura Mazda.
But akhenaten changed it from the polytheistic pantheon after zoroastrianism began around 1500 B.C. as I said in my post you replied to in the first place.
I would agree with you in that any early post diluvian civilization would be heavily polytheistic. But would you agree that this era is not the beginning of Human history? Almost all of these ancient civilizations speak of a catastrophic flood where only a few survived. That much is historical.
Not much history to be had going back that far is there?
Well, the family(s) that survived that flood would’ve had intimate knowledge of the world prior to that flood and would’ve most likely passed some of those stories on through their Oral traditions - much like the majority of ancient history back then.
Of the ancient records/stories we do possess, someone had to get it right, yes?
many "polytheists" understood their various gods as various expressions of one original source. early ancient egyptians had this understanding, but it was not preserved.
At least they didn't make the blunder of a male god with no female counterpart to get it on with:
https://www.swanbazaar.com/Blog/post/geb-and-nut-the-earth-and-the-sky
Nut is a daughter of Shu and Tefnut. Her brother and husband is Geb. She had four children; Osiris, Set, Isis, and Nephthys. She is considered one of the oldest deities among the Egyptian pantheon, with her origin being found in the creation story of Heliopolis. She was originally the goddess of the nighttime sky but eventually became referred to as simply the sky goddess. Her headdress was the hieroglyphic of part of her name, a pot, which may also symbolize the uterus. Mostly depicted in nude human form, Nut was also sometimes depicted in the form of a cow whose great body formed the sky and heavens, a sycamore tree, or as a giant sow, suckling many piglets.
I don't think I consider that to be a blunder. found the polytheist?
It's like the big bang but it's the giant jerkoff by the massive masturbator.
maybe you shouldn't expect to be able to compare man to God so directly? or maybe you are misunderstanding what plays the role of the mother in Christian theology. the Bible says Eve was created from the rib of Adam. that's not how girls are made either, but that doesn't mean its a blunder or meaningless.