Azov...Azoth? Is this the Ideology behind the infamous Battalion?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Cabal History
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Clutching at straws. The Azov Battalion was named after the Sea of Azov, as their headquarters had been in the city of Melitopol, on its shore. The Sea of Azov was named for entirely different things. No alchemical significance.
Hello again. Maybe the Sea was named by the people who lived and practiced this religion.
Well Thank you for saying so, I very much appreciate that. And yes we have had some back and forth in regards to another topic. It was another riviting conversation I'll tell you but who knows maybe I made a fan🤷🏻♂️
Not a chance. Read the Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_of_Azov "The name is likely to derive from the settlement of an area around Azov, whose name comes from the Kipchak Turkish asak or azaq 'lowlands'." Do some research before taking the occult plunge.
I guess you cleared it up very well using Wikipedia. Thats a wrap Gentlemen, time to pack it in.
Do you have a better source? No reason to shrug this off; no indication of biased polemic.
There is no "most likely" about correct or wrong. This is what there is...and it has nothing to do with alchemy or the occult. "Azoth" shows up in the sixteenth century, and "Azov" shows up in the 11th century. Gee...it must be a pain in the spleen for your favorite fantasy connection to be a complete bust.
Just because you want it to be so, doesn't mean that it is actually so. You gotta break yourself of that addiction.
You do know that what appears in Wikipedia is the only last edit, by random people, of an entry...right? Always best to check another source or 3 instead of depending solely on what you read on wiki. Wikipedia is about as far lefty/liberal as you can find.
Him and I have a history of this behavior stemming from another post. And the DC Swamp is a lowland, but maybe thats a stretch too.
Likely is the strategic word here. What makes the WIKI referenced likely claim more logical and probable than say: AZOV -> AZOTH? Bias?
I do agree with the notion that more inquiry should be done.
"Likely" implies experience of closely similar cases. Not applicable here. The presumption of innocence (truthfulness or accuracy) applies. You are just using "likely" as a magic word to cover over sheer fancy. But I don't get the impression that you bothered to read the Wiki entry, because you don't acknowledge the various name origins they reviewed. There is NO linguistic path to "azoth" which is only a chemical, and a mythical chemical at that, which reference appears 500 years after "azov."