Breaking::: Free Eye Exam for those Willing to OPEN Theirs👀👀
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
We already learned a while back that all of the "conspiracy theories" are true. It's hard to break free of the programming.
No, not all. For every CS there is a counter created by the deep state. Flat earth is not real. The elites are not lizards, we landed on the moon, and untill proven otherwise, biden is the same human he has always been.
Whether the earth is flat or round or a triangle can be proven by a variety of techniques. These are experiments that anyone can conduct on their own.
Regarding some people actually being lizards, that's an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary proof. Humans landing on the moon is also an extraordinary claim that requires extraordinary proof. To prove either of these, we need more than the claims of a few, or out of focus questionable "big foot" videos. Please don't reverse the requirements on either of these. Likewise, saying Biden is really someone else also requires proof, especially when the supposed proof shows a lot of points of comparison that haven't changed.
Proof we landed on the moon? NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, which has orbited and mapped the Moon at the highest resolution ever has mapped the 3 landing sites, showing the still intact appallo 14 landing site. Unfortunately I cannot teleport you to the moon, but there are satellites and those can take images. Those images show us being there. Unless that is, you believe satellites don't exist. But do you believe in telescopes? What about point on of those to a satellite? Or is that a bluebeam lazer illusion?
As my point was, you need to prove we landed on the moon, not that we didn't land on the moon. It's important not to reverse the burden of proof. If you're satisfied with all the proof you just described, great.
It's 6 landing sites, not 3.
You asked if I "believe in" telescopes. I don't "believe in" anything. I believe things when it can be demonstrated. Meaning I "believe that, because...". If telescopes can be demonstrated, then it can be believable. If telescopes cannot be demonstrated, then there is no reason to find it believable. "Believing in" things is asking one to turn their brain off and not think about why you believe it or if it's warranted to be believable.
As for your chain of logic here, you're making some unwarranted leaps. If your only proof that NASA went to the moon is from supposed photos provided by NASA and not a neutral third party, then that's a proof that wouldn't hold up in a court of law by itself. Being combative about minor side issues like satellites, telescopes, and lasers is not a clear way to think about this.
Finally, I never even shared what my position on the moon is. I'm only providing guidance on how to properly analyze fantastic claims, in a way that's grounded in reality. FYI, my grandfather worked for a NASA contractor and was one of the engineers who designed the Apollo Spacecraft, a fact we're very proud of in my family.
A stolen election also requires proof. The proof was shown; and ignored.
Same thing here.
No proof was shown of him being fake
Never allow yourself to be programmed.
Once people start realizing that most "conspiracy theories" are true, the government is going to muddy the waters by hiring people that say all the right things so they're "on our side", and then they start adding some new really wacky ideas to attract people to. The result being that our side starts getting filled with people believing a lot of off the wall things.
Every case needs to be judged on its own. It doesn't matter who first said it, or who currently believes it, or whether it appears they're "on our side" or not.
That's all that matter