For whatever reason this video was recommended to me on Youtube. I've never seen this guy before, and for my tastes, he's a little too exuberant in his bias, but his sourcing is impeccable, and he gives details on those sources within his narrative.
According to his evidence, Abraham Lincoln, and the entire American Civil War had nothing to do with freeing black people, and everything to do with creating a totalitarian Federal Government (AKA Globalism).
People think the Greenback is proof of Lincolns "side" ("against" the bankers). I have not found that to be corroborated in my investigation. In fact, I think that pushed us more in debt to the Rothschilds, though I have yet to nail down a direct connection between that act and the Rothschilds, so it's more of a supposition at this point.
Regardless, my investigation into Lincoln outside of the Greenback produced a very different story than official history suggests. This is especially true within the scope of the Civil War, which put us forever in debt (we are STILL in debt from the Civil War to the European Central Bank (AKA Rothschild)), and put us all (every single citizen of the United States of America) in perpetual debt slavery, from which we can never legally escape.
I think Lincoln was an agent of the Cabal, pushing us towards a One World Government. This video exposes a great deal of evidence that supports that assertion, and imo, is a must see for the citations alone.
If you find the narrator off-putting, please try to get past his obvious bias. There is really a lot of good evidence in there.
The confederation was not the good side. Lincoln was a man just like Trump both have their good and bad. But most definitely better than the alternatives. If you self examine you will find out there are things about yourself that even you don’t like. Try to judge others with fairness, if they are more good than evil, they are not evil… if they are more evil than good, they are not good.
As for "the confederation was not the good side," where does an argument that suggests that Lincoln was a Cabal agent suggest that the Confederation was "good?" What if they were BOTH Controlled Opposition, just like every "two sides" of every other war in all of our history?
Conflating an argument against Lincoln with an argument for the Confederation is a red herring, having NOTHING to do with what I presented.
Look at the evidence, then bring your debate against it. This is the way.
Making a declarative statement, or presenting your "overall judgement" as you have done, without addressing the actual evidence presented is not the path to the truth in any investigation, rather it is the path we have been taught to obfuscate it.
IMO Lincoln had to slap down the south- which at that time was by far the richest most fertile most productive part of the country- slavery was horrible but there were slaves of all races in a lot of states…( in a fragment of an 1854 publication Lincoln actually justifies slavery based on race and intellect) the Confederacy was a scapegoat and the issue of the southern slaves in particular was a distraction…
The link in the OP provides numerous sources that show that Lincoln stated and pushed slavery on numerous occasions. The evidence provided within is very compelling, which is why I linked it.
It is not uncommon to find Lincoln apologists who have not done sufficient research into the events of the time, focusing only on the parts that appease their bias (confirmation bias).
It is so easy to assume that because there were evils contained in the Confederacy that Lincoln (the "other side") was fighting those evils. On the contrary, my own scholarship suggests the evils on both sides had the same source (the Banksters). The puppetmasters, pulling the strings, through propaganda efforts on both sides, solidified the US, formerly a collection of Sovereign States, under their control; with all citizens, from that moment forward, in perpetual debt slavery.