A lil 9/11 truth for ya
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Hologram theory? I lean more towards Field McConnell's BUAP theory, where the planes were remotely flown into the buildings with all aboard already dead from gas piped through the AC system, and bombs placed by the E Team Israeli Art Students taking the towers down. Open to being corrected though, not a hard liner on it
The remote takeover of the aircraft is very plausible, and in my opinion it's why the smoking gun which is building 7 still had to fall, after flight 93 remote takeover went wrong.
Again, IMO flight 93 was intended to hit building 7 to complete the perceived collapse and cover the loss of the data that was housed there, as it was in the 3 other buildings that were bought down.
When flight 93 remote hijacking went wrong, they still had to destroy building 7 and turn it into the key fact that undermines the whole official narrative. The University of Alaska study into the collapse of building 7 fairly recently released shows categorically that the official NIST narrative about the collapse is full of shit.
The trouble is most people have never heard of the fall of building 7, nor what was housed there!
alright, shit. Just watched this Ace Baker video someone posted https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/ I am really doubting my opinion on the planes. Seeing that looped clip of the plane going in and out of the building makes no sense at all
Yea I think the planes disintegrated in the clouds of smoke and the debris was swept away with the buildings and sent to china asap. But what about the people on the ground seeing planes in real time, their reactions to the second plane on home video
I cant wrap my head around that, Ive seen people being interviewed on the street after the first explosion and the 2nd plane came flying through and they look up right at it. The amount of CGI and crisis actors required seems too high for my brain