I could be wrong but, I'm starting to think those dancing fools were not even medical staff. Most likely actors, dressed up in protective garb, hiding their identity, playing to the pandemic narrative and somehow an effort to push the vaccine.
I work in a hospital, this would have never taken place where I work. I have sat in patient rooms with a N-95 mask, gown/gloves, eye protection, 12 hours shifts. Managing an ECMO pump on several of the sickest patients. It was horrible, your face feels numb from the pressure of the mask after a few hours. The last thing in the world the nurses would consider is putting on that stuff to create a video.
I remember in the early stages of the plandemic, gathering information from this board, reading the warnings about Remdesivir causing acute kidney failure and suggesting to several doctors that I have a good relationship with, trying Ivermectin. They admit at the time they were reading the same literature but was unconvinced that a parasite medication would be effective.
All the hatred should be centered at the NIH and CDC. Financial reimbursement for treating covid patients was increased by 10's of thousands of dollars if you followed NIH/CDC protocols. Pushing Remdesivir and blocking Ivermectin came from the TOP of the industry- Fauci.
Most of the medical staff, across the country, would follow direction and fail to do any research themselves. I think I can see the guilt in the faces of a few of the doctors I work with. The mask mandates in the hospitals are gone, nurses have stopped wearing them. Yet, many of the doctors still walk around in a N-95's, almost as if they are marking themselves for their own failures. I think they realize they fucked up, have shame and chose to keep their faces covered to convey a fake sense of precaution. Like they are trying to subconsciously ramp up fear among the staff in a effort to justify their ignorance and malpractice. It is really weird.
I agree. I haven't worked bedside for almost 10 years, but not only would those supplies have never been wasted like that, but no one had time to play around. We barely had time to get our work done.
I'm confident they found people to do it. Use the late shifts who get some down time. Use the mid-level managers to come in and do the dances while the floor nurses are busy. Pull the chart auditors and other paper jockeys to do it. I am very confident those were real nurses at US hospitals and probably the very well-paid ones, not the ones making $20-25/hr straight out of nursing school.
As you said, the thirst for vengeance needs to be focused at the top. That was source of lie and the source of the tyrannical demands for compliance. Whether was the top of the FDA and the CDC, or the top of your local health system, this was implemented top down.
How is it possible? What are the personal, professional and political contexts that allow physicians to use their skills to torture and kill rather than heal? What are the psychological characteristics and the social, cultural and political factors that predispose physicians to participate in human rights abuses? What can be done to recognize at-risk situations and attempt to provide corrective or preventive strategies? This article examines case studies from Nazi Germany in an attempt to answer these questions. Subjects discussed include the psychology of the individual perpetrator, dehumanization, numbing, splitting, omnipotence, medicalization, group dynamics, obedience to authority, diffusion of responsibility, theories of aggression, training, cultural and social contexts, accountability and prevention.
What was discontinued was only the visible dimension of the project: the large-scale gassing of patients. T4 officially ceased as a program, but that turned out to be still another deception. Widespread killing continued in a second phase, sometimes referred to in Nazi documents as “wild euthanasia” because doctors — encouraged, if not directed, by the regime — could now act on their own initiative concerning who would live or die.
But then instead of doing it for medical purposes, it was for killing …. It was very much like a medical ceremony …. They were so careful to keep the full pecision of a medical process — but with the aim of killing. That was what was so shocking.
The objection of the army medical inspector Anton Waldmann weighed more heavily. A personal decision of the "comrade" when vaccinating would contradict "the leader's principle" and thus increase the risk of epidemics "among the people", which "in the event of a future war forced upon us [...] would prevent the army from freedom of movement". At the end of the meeting, these military-political reasons led to the realization that there were still reservations about the abolition of compulsory vaccination. The commission therefore did not come to a conclusive conclusion, from which an important finding can be gained: in 1933 there was no concept ready for a main instrument of modern population policy. After the "seizure of power", an unusually open discussion was held about the modern precautionary measures. The fact that the self-responsibility of the “national comrade” was an important argument, and that state coercion was even seen as a contradiction to National Socialist ethics, shows two things: the programmatic contradictions of health policy and the ambiguity about the legitimacy of state coercion vis-à-vis “national comrades”. One could summarize that vaccination mutated into a litmus test for the “consent dictatorship” in the early phase of the “Third Reich”*. After all, when it came to vaccinations, it was the “completely normal Germans” who were wanted to win for the “ Volksge-meinschaft” [national community].
It goes without saying that with this preventive practice quite a few practical problems arose. In fact, the interaction of the actors, especially between those of the health authorities and the NSV, developed again and again into a competition between state and party departments for supremacy in preventive care 93. In addition, reports from the municipalities indicate that the interaction under wartime conditions brought about further frictional losses 94. Those responsible were all the more interested in the beautiful appearance that mass vaccinations developed as an example of the preventive “national community”. As early as 1935 there was evidence that mass vaccinations were always intended to fulfill a propaganda function. During the first diphtheria vaccinations, value was placed on the fact that "private vaccinations" for "children of 'prominent personalities'" 95 were forbidden and that all vaccinates were treated equally in both senses of the word.
In the long term, the expansion of the range of vaccinations in the "Third Reich" paved the way for health policy since the 1950s, with the Federal Republic and the GDR proceeding differently. Smallpox vaccinations were compulsory in both Germanys. However, while in the West all further vaccinations were voluntary, in the East they soon went back to compulsory. Prophylaxis was too deeply enshrined as a basic principle of a new society in the GDR for people to want to take the risk of careless immunizations. The ubiquitous motto "Socialism is the best prophylaxis" also applied in reverse.
Vaccination in the "Third Reich" can therefore be understood as forced modernization and individualization against one's will. The worsening hygienic state of emergency, the increasing migration movements, the return of wartime epidemics all increased the attractiveness of vaccination protection in the Reich. Added to this was the lack of doctors and medicines, so that more and more Germans almost inevitably had to take their immunization into their own hands and in this way found their “preventive self”.
I work in the intensive care unit. The ICU does not administer vaccines. Most of the patients we receive are critically ill and we are focused on stabilizing them and keeping them alive. I work in a specialized field that is absolutely required when caring for the sickest patients.
I myself refused the vaccine and was ready to retire if they declined my religious exemption. Most of the people in my dept refused the vaccine. It was me that informed most of my coworkers about the dangers associated with these vaccines. We stuck together, left them with zero options, approve our exemptions or shut the doors on the hospital. At the time we were short staffed, we had job listings posted and no applicants. Many healthcare workers walked away, I think many were afraid of dying from covid.
I could be wrong but, I'm starting to think those dancing fools were not even medical staff. Most likely actors, dressed up in protective garb, hiding their identity, playing to the pandemic narrative and somehow an effort to push the vaccine.
I work in a hospital, this would have never taken place where I work. I have sat in patient rooms with a N-95 mask, gown/gloves, eye protection, 12 hours shifts. Managing an ECMO pump on several of the sickest patients. It was horrible, your face feels numb from the pressure of the mask after a few hours. The last thing in the world the nurses would consider is putting on that stuff to create a video.
I remember in the early stages of the plandemic, gathering information from this board, reading the warnings about Remdesivir causing acute kidney failure and suggesting to several doctors that I have a good relationship with, trying Ivermectin. They admit at the time they were reading the same literature but was unconvinced that a parasite medication would be effective.
All the hatred should be centered at the NIH and CDC. Financial reimbursement for treating covid patients was increased by 10's of thousands of dollars if you followed NIH/CDC protocols. Pushing Remdesivir and blocking Ivermectin came from the TOP of the industry- Fauci.
Most of the medical staff, across the country, would follow direction and fail to do any research themselves. I think I can see the guilt in the faces of a few of the doctors I work with. The mask mandates in the hospitals are gone, nurses have stopped wearing them. Yet, many of the doctors still walk around in a N-95's, almost as if they are marking themselves for their own failures. I think they realize they fucked up, have shame and chose to keep their faces covered to convey a fake sense of precaution. Like they are trying to subconsciously ramp up fear among the staff in a effort to justify their ignorance and malpractice. It is really weird.
People trusted their doctors and the doctors poisoned them.
Well said, thanks for the insiders perspective.
I agree. I haven't worked bedside for almost 10 years, but not only would those supplies have never been wasted like that, but no one had time to play around. We barely had time to get our work done.
I'm confident they found people to do it. Use the late shifts who get some down time. Use the mid-level managers to come in and do the dances while the floor nurses are busy. Pull the chart auditors and other paper jockeys to do it. I am very confident those were real nurses at US hospitals and probably the very well-paid ones, not the ones making $20-25/hr straight out of nursing school.
As you said, the thirst for vengeance needs to be focused at the top. That was source of lie and the source of the tyrannical demands for compliance. Whether was the top of the FDA and the CDC, or the top of your local health system, this was implemented top down.
In my entire nursing career, I have never worked with anyone who would do something this stupid at work.
This isn't the first time this has happened.
Why teach all of this Holocaust history if in the end it doesn't matter anyway?
— Auschwitz prisoner doctor
Oddly enough, West Germany [nazis] eased off compulsory vaccination while East Germany [commies] began compulsory programs after a break:
Mask as the medical scarlet letter. Hm.
No bad intent, but.... did you ever administer the jab yourself to anyone?
I work in the intensive care unit. The ICU does not administer vaccines. Most of the patients we receive are critically ill and we are focused on stabilizing them and keeping them alive. I work in a specialized field that is absolutely required when caring for the sickest patients.
I myself refused the vaccine and was ready to retire if they declined my religious exemption. Most of the people in my dept refused the vaccine. It was me that informed most of my coworkers about the dangers associated with these vaccines. We stuck together, left them with zero options, approve our exemptions or shut the doors on the hospital. At the time we were short staffed, we had job listings posted and no applicants. Many healthcare workers walked away, I think many were afraid of dying from covid.