Not a lawyer but I did just finish Better Call Saul. Since it is a State matter that only affected the State of Arizona, is the SCOTAZ the final showdown?
She might get five judges to actually look at the evidence if it can get to SCOTUS. The Brunson case seemed too good to be true so I expected scotus to keep swatting it down. A federal election or dispute among states seems reasonable to take up the case but I suspect the end is close and it will be in AZ.
Here we have a clear an convincing case of election fraud and a system that perpetuates that with corrupt judges that ping-pong cases between lower courts, appeals courts with the idea that this needs to happen in order to advance it to SCOTUS. Who really wins and who really loses in this situation? We the people lose because the rightful governor is not allowed to take office. Who wins? Lawyers who can bill for time spend pushing paper back and forth endlessly. The judge wins because he keeps his corrupt position. Hobbs and her band of thieves win. The cartels win because it shows who really holds power in AZ. Given the above, why are people moving from CA to AZ when the same corrupt issues plague both states? In reality it plagues many states.
I'm not sure people escaping CA because of politics specifically rather than just general misery are picking AZ that much. A lot of any CA -> AZ moves might just be because pretty close/still out west/cheaper (esp people that want the inland-LA atmosphere of PHX)(ugh)(Snottsdale, double ugh).
I'm in East CA (CO) and AZ was a prime target but I was watching/waiting to see how 2022 panned out, so while it's hardly a ton of evidence (huge sample size here) I expect avoiding AZ is the case for many escaping CA who are actually thinking about such things.
Perhaps one of the things that needs to be shown is how utterly corrupt the justice system is, and why ultimately, America's problem cannot simply be solved via the existing institutional means.
It's like rinse and repeat until the majority get how corrupt the system is. The evidence that verification was impossible at the speed it occurred was very convincing to anyone that saw it.
Normies don't look at the news sources that report on this. Normies are normies because they watch and read MSM. They probably have no idea this trial took place.
That's a good point, but I also think it is worth noting that the number of 'normies' is continuously decreasing, and the number of awakened (appears) to be increasing.
As more and more folks in the normie world get red-pilled, they begin to look at things differently and seek out other information sources. That's a one-directional flow.
I'd be very confident that more people are aware of the election fraud now than there were 12 months ago, or 2 years ago, etc. It's that gradual burn that needs to keep lit. The tipping point is.... where?
Thus, to my original point, even if those still firmly in normie land don't know about this trial, those not in normie land are being constantly red-pilled more and more.
Not dooming by any means. Why the third appeal? It’s obvious this isn’t going to be fixed in court. Evidently corrupt judges are a dime a dozen.
The appeals are not the same
The hoops need to be jumped before it can go to SCOTUS
Not a lawyer but I did just finish Better Call Saul. Since it is a State matter that only affected the State of Arizona, is the SCOTAZ the final showdown?
She might get five judges to actually look at the evidence if it can get to SCOTUS. The Brunson case seemed too good to be true so I expected scotus to keep swatting it down. A federal election or dispute among states seems reasonable to take up the case but I suspect the end is close and it will be in AZ.
If SCOTUS wouldn't look at the evidence for the federal election theft, why would they look at Arizona?
Here we have a clear an convincing case of election fraud and a system that perpetuates that with corrupt judges that ping-pong cases between lower courts, appeals courts with the idea that this needs to happen in order to advance it to SCOTUS. Who really wins and who really loses in this situation? We the people lose because the rightful governor is not allowed to take office. Who wins? Lawyers who can bill for time spend pushing paper back and forth endlessly. The judge wins because he keeps his corrupt position. Hobbs and her band of thieves win. The cartels win because it shows who really holds power in AZ. Given the above, why are people moving from CA to AZ when the same corrupt issues plague both states? In reality it plagues many states.
I'm not sure people escaping CA because of politics specifically rather than just general misery are picking AZ that much. A lot of any CA -> AZ moves might just be because pretty close/still out west/cheaper (esp people that want the inland-LA atmosphere of PHX)(ugh)(Snottsdale, double ugh).
I'm in East CA (CO) and AZ was a prime target but I was watching/waiting to see how 2022 panned out, so while it's hardly a ton of evidence (huge sample size here) I expect avoiding AZ is the case for many escaping CA who are actually thinking about such things.
Where they can say “whoops, no standing, lol, amirite”
Perhaps one of the things that needs to be shown is how utterly corrupt the justice system is, and why ultimately, America's problem cannot simply be solved via the existing institutional means.
It's like rinse and repeat until the majority get how corrupt the system is. The evidence that verification was impossible at the speed it occurred was very convincing to anyone that saw it.
Yup. CLEAR AND CONVINCING.
Normies don't look at the news sources that report on this. Normies are normies because they watch and read MSM. They probably have no idea this trial took place.
That's a good point, but I also think it is worth noting that the number of 'normies' is continuously decreasing, and the number of awakened (appears) to be increasing.
As more and more folks in the normie world get red-pilled, they begin to look at things differently and seek out other information sources. That's a one-directional flow.
I'd be very confident that more people are aware of the election fraud now than there were 12 months ago, or 2 years ago, etc. It's that gradual burn that needs to keep lit. The tipping point is.... where?
Thus, to my original point, even if those still firmly in normie land don't know about this trial, those not in normie land are being constantly red-pilled more and more.