Right. So make the film without the visual tricks, it's more bland and less interesting...and libs will pick something ELSE about it to mock and deride. It's what they do.
What WON'T they do?
They WON'T acknowledge the lack of visual effects, and then accord a film respect and credibility on that account.
Thinking that will happen is like John McNoname thinking if we're super nice to the terrorists we capture, then the bad guys will remember that and be super nice to our guys later in the same situation. Because fair-minded!
For one thing, the effects aren't necessary. They're just gadget filters in tools like Final Cut Pro and After Effects. I've played with them and they're gimmicky. There are other legit ways to grab attention and keep the viewer engaged. I know this because I've done countless hours of shooting and editing video.
It's not about placating the left, it's about forcing them to critique the substance instead of the easy targets.
Right. So make the film without the visual tricks, it's more bland and less interesting...and libs will pick something ELSE about it to mock and deride. It's what they do.
What WON'T they do?
They WON'T acknowledge the lack of visual effects, and then accord a film respect and credibility on that account.
Thinking that will happen is like John McNoname thinking if we're super nice to the terrorists we capture, then the bad guys will remember that and be super nice to our guys later in the same situation. Because fair-minded!
For one thing, the effects aren't necessary. They're just gadget filters in tools like Final Cut Pro and After Effects. I've played with them and they're gimmicky. There are other legit ways to grab attention and keep the viewer engaged. I know this because I've done countless hours of shooting and editing video.
It's not about placating the left, it's about forcing them to critique the substance instead of the easy targets.