Because we're supposed to be better than propagandists about the information we find and present in this great awakening. It's that simple.
You answered a question using a "report that was never aired again" which was clearly edited to back up the claim that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon. When I can find the full clip and debunk your video, it makes us all look bad.
No, it's the standard with which we need to operate if we're going to sway minds. Otherwise we just make ourselves look like the crazy tin hat conspiracy theorists many already think we are, and turn people off. When that happens, people are aware something is wrong, but stop there. There are a whole bunch of other questions surrounding 9/11 without resorting to clearly edited footage to make the point.
Focusing on the point that of the dozens of cameras in the area, tourists, etc, only one cctv camera caught 5 frames of something hitting the Pentagon? That, as you posted, Rumsfeld initially states that it was a missile? Those are the threads to plant in minds.
My personal opinion would be that things like snake venom in the water and all the other fringe stuff detract from Q. It's distraction.
The post asked what was missing. I answered. Why do you feel the need to cajole me?
Is this what YOU wanted to see?
PENTAGON
Missile Hitting the Pentagon on 911: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5O1fGmscMc
Pentagon Hit By Missile, Not Plane https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ib9Lt5CxYGoe
White House: Rumsfeld Interview Says Missile Hit Pentagon On 9/11
https://newspunch.com/white-house-rumsfeld-interview-says-missile-hit-pentagon-on-911/
Footage Never Seen Again https://files.catbox.moe/nshskl.MP4
Hidden Video Showing What Really Hit the Pentagon: https://www.bitchute.com/video/QZMguwD5HGmE/
If I posted all that initially, you would probably say: "I already know that old info. Why are you putting it up again? Happy now?
Because we're supposed to be better than propagandists about the information we find and present in this great awakening. It's that simple.
You answered a question using a "report that was never aired again" which was clearly edited to back up the claim that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon. When I can find the full clip and debunk your video, it makes us all look bad.
That's your personal opinion how others are supposed to post.
Descretion is the better part of valor.
No, it's the standard with which we need to operate if we're going to sway minds. Otherwise we just make ourselves look like the crazy tin hat conspiracy theorists many already think we are, and turn people off. When that happens, people are aware something is wrong, but stop there. There are a whole bunch of other questions surrounding 9/11 without resorting to clearly edited footage to make the point.
Focusing on the point that of the dozens of cameras in the area, tourists, etc, only one cctv camera caught 5 frames of something hitting the Pentagon? That, as you posted, Rumsfeld initially states that it was a missile? Those are the threads to plant in minds.
My personal opinion would be that things like snake venom in the water and all the other fringe stuff detract from Q. It's distraction.
Whatever.
If you think it's more important to critique someone's post than contributing to the conversation, that's your thing. Pretty useless IMO.