Armor-piercing rounds: The projectile has high mass per frontal area, so as to attain high momentum per frontal area, which allows it to go through steel like it was plastic. Actual fact---it causes plastic deformation of the metal. If the penetrator is tungsten, then it gets through and creates the usual havoc of a ballistic object. If the pentrator is uranium, it is already molten and flashes into a mist that instantly catches on fire (pyrophoric). The heat of the bulk uranium-air combustion ramps up the pressure inside the tank, probably blows the turret off, and sets off the tank ammo as a secondary detonation.
Second paragraph: "Are you talking to me?" Or was that just an elaborate recourse to name-calling in lieu of argument?
Great now we are making progress. The high heat melts the pinpoint area of impact resulting in a hole in the steel tank. The hole is evident because of the steel that didn't melt. You are absolutely correct that steel can be liquified and reshaped while in that molten state. We know a 50 bmg could pierce through a tank but will not melt the entire tank to the ground like popping a balloon. So my point is that there is not enough fuel in a 767 to melt that tower to the ground in a pancake freefall. Don't forget that in the midst of that tower melting heat, Mohammed Attas passport fluttered safely to the sidewalk uncharred. Build your origami tower out of that paper next time.
I suspect the q post board is filled with users who question the official narrative.
Calling out someone who questions the official narrative as someone who is trivializing the deaths of the victims is a form of shouting down any dissent. Your "How dare you" only works on people that care about misgendering someone. I expect that response at the Huffington post. I assure you that Bush/cheney and cabal lied about 911. The victims they sacrificed are not trivialized just because I don't believe some cave dweller masterminded an attack that was described by Al Gore years before, and implemented on the very day of a training exercise of the same nature. How many coincidences until it is mathematically impossible?
I'm moving on. If I had definitive proof to show you, then I would be arkancided. One day after W is gone,.they will let us know for sure. We had to wait until after HW was gone to know that the Clowns popped JFK. I still work with folks that believe Iraq had WMDs, masks work, clot shot was safe and effective, Biden won, the flu disappeared, water sticks to a spinning ball, people evolved from slime and the big bang created everything from nothing. We don't need to agree.
I don't follow your thinking. In an anti-tank round, the penetration comes from brute force plastic deformation of the steel by a denser, harder penetrator projectile. It is not melting the steel armor.
No one has ever said that the fuel in the 767 melted the Twin Towers. That is an absurdity. But the burning fuel can certainly heat the structural columns to temperatures where its strength would be gone. Structural steel is reduced to 30% of its room temperature strength by the time it reaches 600 deg C. Meanwhile, what is to stop a passport from drifting down to the ground within moments of the collision?
The problem is that there is no "lie" involved in "the official narrative." It is coherent and consistent with known physics and engineering. It seems to me that a Lot of People have jumped off the cliff of "It's all lies," and have psychotically denied the truth. Not because there is compelling evidence that something else is the truth and we have the detailed receipts---but because there is a psychological need to feed the paranoid narrative of "it's all lies." If the "official narrative" were understood to be the truth...then what becomes of "it's all lies"? That, itself, would become a lie. And then we would have to scrutinize fellow-travelers who have fallen off the deep end with fabulous paranoid conspiracies. That wouldn't be polite, perhaps. And it would be fraught with self-recognition. But maybe a step back from the brink, toward sanity, is a good idea, if the alternative is to embrace insanity and become untouchable from the normie point of view.
And, by the way, water (and everything else) does stick to a spinning ball, to the tune of 1 pound force for 1 pound of mass. Nothing else to pull it away. (The effect of the spin is teeny-tiny by comparison.)
Armor-piercing rounds: The projectile has high mass per frontal area, so as to attain high momentum per frontal area, which allows it to go through steel like it was plastic. Actual fact---it causes plastic deformation of the metal. If the penetrator is tungsten, then it gets through and creates the usual havoc of a ballistic object. If the pentrator is uranium, it is already molten and flashes into a mist that instantly catches on fire (pyrophoric). The heat of the bulk uranium-air combustion ramps up the pressure inside the tank, probably blows the turret off, and sets off the tank ammo as a secondary detonation.
Second paragraph: "Are you talking to me?" Or was that just an elaborate recourse to name-calling in lieu of argument?
Great now we are making progress. The high heat melts the pinpoint area of impact resulting in a hole in the steel tank. The hole is evident because of the steel that didn't melt. You are absolutely correct that steel can be liquified and reshaped while in that molten state. We know a 50 bmg could pierce through a tank but will not melt the entire tank to the ground like popping a balloon. So my point is that there is not enough fuel in a 767 to melt that tower to the ground in a pancake freefall. Don't forget that in the midst of that tower melting heat, Mohammed Attas passport fluttered safely to the sidewalk uncharred. Build your origami tower out of that paper next time.
I suspect the q post board is filled with users who question the official narrative. Calling out someone who questions the official narrative as someone who is trivializing the deaths of the victims is a form of shouting down any dissent. Your "How dare you" only works on people that care about misgendering someone. I expect that response at the Huffington post. I assure you that Bush/cheney and cabal lied about 911. The victims they sacrificed are not trivialized just because I don't believe some cave dweller masterminded an attack that was described by Al Gore years before, and implemented on the very day of a training exercise of the same nature. How many coincidences until it is mathematically impossible?
I'm moving on. If I had definitive proof to show you, then I would be arkancided. One day after W is gone,.they will let us know for sure. We had to wait until after HW was gone to know that the Clowns popped JFK. I still work with folks that believe Iraq had WMDs, masks work, clot shot was safe and effective, Biden won, the flu disappeared, water sticks to a spinning ball, people evolved from slime and the big bang created everything from nothing. We don't need to agree.
I don't follow your thinking. In an anti-tank round, the penetration comes from brute force plastic deformation of the steel by a denser, harder penetrator projectile. It is not melting the steel armor.
No one has ever said that the fuel in the 767 melted the Twin Towers. That is an absurdity. But the burning fuel can certainly heat the structural columns to temperatures where its strength would be gone. Structural steel is reduced to 30% of its room temperature strength by the time it reaches 600 deg C. Meanwhile, what is to stop a passport from drifting down to the ground within moments of the collision?
The problem is that there is no "lie" involved in "the official narrative." It is coherent and consistent with known physics and engineering. It seems to me that a Lot of People have jumped off the cliff of "It's all lies," and have psychotically denied the truth. Not because there is compelling evidence that something else is the truth and we have the detailed receipts---but because there is a psychological need to feed the paranoid narrative of "it's all lies." If the "official narrative" were understood to be the truth...then what becomes of "it's all lies"? That, itself, would become a lie. And then we would have to scrutinize fellow-travelers who have fallen off the deep end with fabulous paranoid conspiracies. That wouldn't be polite, perhaps. And it would be fraught with self-recognition. But maybe a step back from the brink, toward sanity, is a good idea, if the alternative is to embrace insanity and become untouchable from the normie point of view.
And, by the way, water (and everything else) does stick to a spinning ball, to the tune of 1 pound force for 1 pound of mass. Nothing else to pull it away. (The effect of the spin is teeny-tiny by comparison.)