I've been noticing that this here forum/home of ours has been getting increasingly more focused on "typical" conspiracy theory fare. I can get down with a lot of it tbh, I've been digging into most of the various topics I see now for years...BUT...for normies coming here, we HAVE to stick to as much factual information as possible.
Think about how all these posts about Biden being a clone or actor look to normies...or even some of Pentagon videos...
The post about Paul Walker and the Clinton Foundation with no sauce and just a low res snippet of an article...somewhere...
The reason the Anon community and Q has kept up momentum and has made such an impact is because it's been grounded in evidence. Typically evidence that comes out of mainstream news sources that normies read. We just connect some dots that normies are brainwashed out of.
Q hasn't posted in a long time. Many Anons are tired of the battles/war. We were warned this would be the case, so let's refocus. r/conspiracy became a wasteland of crap over time but it was allowed to exist for a reason. It was mostly junk and no one cared about what was posted because it was so outlandish that normies never bought into any of it.
Let's at least not sticky posts like the one claiming Biden is an actor when the images are clearly explained with the simplest explanation...plastic surgery. (All due respect to OP on that one)
This is an information war and there are likely dozens of groups who want this board shut down or delegitimized. What's the easiest way to do that?
Make us all look like nutjobs and flood the board with posts that mimic conspiracy boards of old.
Heads on a swivel Anons.
Lol this dude.
Start in the middle, go back to the beginning, leads you to the end and opens a world of rabbit holes.
Take Milley Weaver’s doc on data mining. She does exactly the above. For me, that documentary brought me to focus on Op Paperclip. From there I realized the allied forces lost WW2. I also realized USA simply absorbed Nazism and all of it tech and science advancements gained through human experimentation.
Fast forward to the 90s and supposedly sheep were being cloned. It’s safe to assume that was disclosure that human cloning also possible/probable.
Now think about GPS, utilizes 2.5 decades before being released to the public. Same as AI today in my opinion. Now use this factual knowledge to explain to me how “Human Cloning” is just a fringe theory. If you actually care about human trafficking (including body parts), then you should be intrinsically interested in human cloning. Last time I checked, Q is about the children and trafficking in humans amongst other things.
I don't think it's all that unreasonable to believe that human cloning could/has happened. But then there's the issue of age difference. A cloned human isn't going to happen like in the movie Multiplicity. It still starts off as a baby and has to grow up.
And why would you even need to clone someone when it's clearly easier to just get a look alike or use masks or use plastic surgery to make a double? It's just making things needlessly complicated.
Regardless of the age issue….. if you clone a human, you have exact matches for body parts, stem cells, blood, etc.
With regards to the age issue, the question is, do we have the ability to speed up the aging process? I can’t say one way or the other. It’s an unknown within an unknown. My gut tells me humans have been cloned, without question. I’d say it’s possible that we also have rapid aging as well though I don’t know to what extent or how viable it is.
I could’ve told you on September 10 2001 that brown men with box cutters were going to fly three planes into iconic buildings; or in 2006 that Donald Trump would lead the nation to prosperity and wage war on the Illuminati; or in December of 2019 that the next two years we would experience totalitarian regimes across the nation the likes of which we have never seen: It’s all crazy talk until it happens.
So perhaps they are trafficking cloned children.
Why? Like the cloned Biden issue, it's just needlessly complicated.
The amount of money involved in cloning people would be astronomical. It would be far, far cheaper just to pay people for their children. Or just steal them. It's not like there's any shortage of desperate and/or evil people in the world that would sell their kids for a couple grand. It's the main reason why we have so much child trafficking already.
I just don't see why anyone needs to come up with these overly complicated scenarios when there's ample evidence that there are far, far easier and cheaper ways to accomplish their goals.