May is the 5th month, not the 6th. But using 6 gets the predermined result of 17.
And if the 6 is from the timestamp, then that means you deliberately OMITTED the month, again in order to get the predetermined result of 17.
This stuff is starting to get really old. Whenever the year needs to be rendered as 2023 to get 17, it's rendered as 2023.
Whenever the year needs to be rendered as 23 to get 17, it's rendered as 23.
Whether the time needs to be rendered in 12-hour or 24-hour format to get 17, that's the format used.
Nothing personal OP but this numberfag BS just makes us look retarded. It's illegitimate nonsense with no basis in anything but fantasy. What if we dropped it? What's the worst that could happen?
It looks to me like the string of numerals from the timestamp through the date are what were added.
So, no math error.
As to your other point... there are always numerous ways to interpret and calculate, and sometimes it's a stretch and sometimes it is right there. And just because the same method of discernment isn't used each time does not mean it is not valid--if it were so predictable thenanyone could do it.
The bottom line is this string of numerals adds to 17. They could have posted at any other time. Coincidence? Well... we all know the golden question.
The month is in letters. To the rest of my point... there is no single way/pattern to use to discern. In this case, only the actual numerals were added.
If you add the month, you get 23. You are right.
So, you're left with the question: Which way is correct, and was there any intention at all?
I answer it this way: One discernment process (numerals only) leads to 17. And that is quite a Qoincidence.
Doesn't prove anything. Just a Qoincidence.
If it lines up with a Q post (which I am still not very good at checking) then it becomes possible hopium.
May is the 5th month, not the 6th. But using 6 gets the predermined result of 17.
And if the 6 is from the timestamp, then that means you deliberately OMITTED the month, again in order to get the predetermined result of 17.
This stuff is starting to get really old. Whenever the year needs to be rendered as 2023 to get 17, it's rendered as 2023.
Whenever the year needs to be rendered as 23 to get 17, it's rendered as 23.
Whether the time needs to be rendered in 12-hour or 24-hour format to get 17, that's the format used.
Nothing personal OP but this numberfag BS just makes us look retarded. It's illegitimate nonsense with no basis in anything but fantasy. What if we dropped it? What's the worst that could happen?
[removed for ulterior purposes] ;)
Agreed. ;p
It looks to me like the string of numerals from the timestamp through the date are what were added.
So, no math error.
As to your other point... there are always numerous ways to interpret and calculate, and sometimes it's a stretch and sometimes it is right there. And just because the same method of discernment isn't used each time does not mean it is not valid--if it were so predictable thenanyone could do it.
The bottom line is this string of numerals adds to 17. They could have posted at any other time. Coincidence? Well... we all know the golden question.
You missed the month.
The month is in letters. To the rest of my point... there is no single way/pattern to use to discern. In this case, only the actual numerals were added.
If you add the month, you get 23. You are right.
So, you're left with the question: Which way is correct, and was there any intention at all?
I answer it this way: One discernment process (numerals only) leads to 17. And that is quite a Qoincidence.
Doesn't prove anything. Just a Qoincidence.
If it lines up with a Q post (which I am still not very good at checking) then it becomes possible hopium.
That's how I understand this stuff, anyway.
Cheers
Cheers anon - upvoted
Making your point without resorting to vicious insults intended to demean and humiliate...much appreciated by almost everyone :)
He raises good points though. He also pointed out the error on your math.
In the search for truth, it's best to be flexible with all your pet theories -- surely that's a given considering the last few years.
Don't be salty, we're all searching for truth.
6:00 P.M. May 31, 2023
6 + 5 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 2 + 3