I like to think about the future. Most of us here do. We are planners and preppers.
There is one variable that I'm not sure how to account for in the future after the Awakening has reached its climactic moment and the truth of things is understood, and some peoples' lives are shattered because they were too attached to the evil system.
What happens to these people? How many will there be? They will be rabid... they will resort to violence in the worst case scenario.
Yes, I know... many of you are ready and waiting. So am I. But beyond that... do we just shrug our shoulders and ignore them? They won't be ignored. They will escalate. And that's when we respond?
In an interesting twist of fate, I am looking forward to when we are in charge (not just behind the scenes, but actually making things right very publicly and restoring America). The twist is this... do we seek to identify and reeducate the rabid anti-America communists? Put them in camps? Hmmmm... that's they're playbook! That's what they would love to do to us. Ironic.
I think it's a fascinating challenge, and as the light at the end of the tunnel gets brighter I think the Anon community needs to have a serious discussion about this topic. Yes, I know that The Plan accounts for everything--but, we must acknowledge that there has been a lot of chaos and various injuries to many people as The Plan unfolds in this war, so the same will probably be true during that phase as well.
Key questions might include:
- What is the rabid behavior we anticipate?
- How many people will there be who are rabid?
- What percent of them will actually resort to out of control actions?
- Given that many of them have been victimized by the cabal system, what form of compassion should be shown to them, and how do we deliver it?
- What new American positivity will be available to us to help win them over? (That's my favorite question).
- Other questions and considerations?
Thanks!
Over the last three years or so, I have captured screenshots of the most outlandish BS postings across my limited social media presence (mostly FB). There are two main offenders (one a former colleague, another the spouse of actually a long time friend), plus some additional not-so-hot takes by others in my social/familial/professional sphere. Why? B/C if they don't stay quiet, I will rub their faces in their past statements, and do it quite vocally. I personally think 99% of humans want group acceptance of being "in the norm" - - and what we are seeing now is a "norm" that is dramatically skewed by evil elements in govt, social media, entertainment, businesses, and especially MSM. That will end. Those True Believers who don't change their tune will be naturally ostracized by polite society. And if they do overreact and break the "new" social contract (via established law), the consequences will be swift and the remaining 99% won't lose a minute of sleep over it. At least that is my take...
A couple weeks ago I think I freaked out some people by quoting things they said in 2020- 2021. They don’t like their bullshit being remembered.
These both sound (chef's kiss) magnifique
Dude I love this, more of this! Any fun details? Look at what I just commented above.
–VulgarProfit 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 If people actually wake up and change their perception as the world changes they will pretend that they always thought that way and completely ignore that they wanted to put us in camps for not being vaccinated and all that. I'd like to see them guilt tripped forever so they might ACTUALLY wake up and learn to think for themselves
One example is from around the time of Biden’s “inauguration” when blue state Dems were trying to celebrate. I talked some smack about Dick Levine and building back better with the tranniest administration ever. One of the Dems replied that he preferred “her” (Dick Levine) to any of Trump’s picks (which includes guys who received the Bronze Star for heroism in combat). In Jan 2021 the Dem saw trannyism as a trendy fringe, and it’s advocacy as a convenient vehicle for displaying his openmindedness. Now almost two and a half years later, the tranny agenda isn’t some harmless trend to be used for easy woke points, it’s a monstrosity pulling at the fabric of society. The Dem guy himself has three kids he’s raising cisgendered ie normal. Now that the masses have turned against trannyism, he doesn’t like to be reminded that he carried water for it.
This makesa lot of sense. I could see it unfolding this way.
Regarding the nose-rubbing... are you selling tickets? : )