If you are a CEO of a company, and your company just expanded their operation massively with huge funding infusion, would you not start recruiting for talent?
Same thing here. The Cabal own the America Inc and when they planned on expanding their operations they needed to recruit more people - aka immigration. That is not just it. If my theory is correct, you will also see expansion in education system - both in US and around the world, to start creating some of these new recruits that are do not even exist.
And there were other factions of the Cabal who based their operations outside - for instance Japan. But America Inc has been their primary vehicle of control since transition from Britain after WW2 and hence the main focus is always there.
BTW, you might have the wrong impression about the immigrants we are talking about. We are not talking about Mexicans or Africans. We are talking about Asians - who as you can see now, are very dominant in Big Tech.
Getting Americans to switch gears into this mode would have required not just education but a much bigger social change that would not have worked in this timeline.
H1B’s and whatnot aren’t placed for their real ability, it’s just to displace natives. Most tech breakthroughs are still by whites, and Chinese and Indians try to copy. If Vijaya Gadde was dominant, it was just because she was handed an executive position in exchange for her suppressing heritage Americans. She didn’t bring any special talent to the table.
Grunt workers were almost 80% non white. I was in the valley during dot com years. I have seen the make up of hitech companies first hand. It was pretty common, even then to be in a meeting room full of Asians and no Whites, or usually the manager would be White.
Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.
Yeah, did I ever make the point that immigrants were needed because of their superior abilities? I used to see the flow of incoming immigrant coders. I have seen some brilliant folks amongst them, but a very small fraction. 90% were just cheap grunt workers who would do anything, say anything to keep earning them dollars.
But building the Big Tech needed all this grunt workers as much as the smart people at the top.
The answer is simpl - Business management 101
If you are a CEO of a company, and your company just expanded their operation massively with huge funding infusion, would you not start recruiting for talent?
Same thing here. The Cabal own the America Inc and when they planned on expanding their operations they needed to recruit more people - aka immigration. That is not just it. If my theory is correct, you will also see expansion in education system - both in US and around the world, to start creating some of these new recruits that are do not even exist.
And there were other factions of the Cabal who based their operations outside - for instance Japan. But America Inc has been their primary vehicle of control since transition from Britain after WW2 and hence the main focus is always there.
BTW, you might have the wrong impression about the immigrants we are talking about. We are not talking about Mexicans or Africans. We are talking about Asians - who as you can see now, are very dominant in Big Tech.
Getting Americans to switch gears into this mode would have required not just education but a much bigger social change that would not have worked in this timeline.
H1B’s and whatnot aren’t placed for their real ability, it’s just to displace natives. Most tech breakthroughs are still by whites, and Chinese and Indians try to copy. If Vijaya Gadde was dominant, it was just because she was handed an executive position in exchange for her suppressing heritage Americans. She didn’t bring any special talent to the table.
Grunt workers were almost 80% non white. I was in the valley during dot com years. I have seen the make up of hitech companies first hand. It was pretty common, even then to be in a meeting room full of Asians and no Whites, or usually the manager would be White.
Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.
“Its not about the ability, but the availability at low cost + ability to condition them ideologically.”
Right. So huge immigration is for cheap tech rather than high tech, but mostly just to replace people who have American ideals.
Yeah, did I ever make the point that immigrants were needed because of their superior abilities? I used to see the flow of incoming immigrant coders. I have seen some brilliant folks amongst them, but a very small fraction. 90% were just cheap grunt workers who would do anything, say anything to keep earning them dollars.
But building the Big Tech needed all this grunt workers as much as the smart people at the top.