Cord blood donations or I guess in this case banking it, are promoted as a more ethical alternative to abortion stem cells. I don't know of much opposition to the practice in conservative circles. Frankly in theory it does seem fine. However this seems like a giant red flag that they're just using it to get baby blood. I wouldn't trust it unless you can do some serious homework on who is getting their hands on it.
https://femtechinsider.com/chrissy-teigen-cord-blood-registry/
There is no such thing as "abortion stem cells." In the case of umbilical or placental stem cell therapy done in Central and South America, these stem cells are obtained from pregnant women immediately following the birth of their child, who are part of a registry that certifies they are disease-free, and that their pregnancy conforms to certain standards.
Under absolutely no circumstances whatsoever are stem cells ever obtained from random abortions. Not only would that be unethical, but dangerous. In the U.S., stem cells are only obtained from bone marrow aspiration from the pelvis.
One can also "bank" stem cells for their children, obtained from placental material...but this is only useful for the child it was originally from.
"Fetal stem cells can be isolated from fetal blood and bone marrow as well as from other fetal tissues, including liver and kidney. Fetal blood is a rich source of haemopoietic stem cells (HSC), which proliferate more rapidly than those in cord blood or adult bone marrow."
"First trimester fetal blood also contains a population of non-haemopoietic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which support haemopoiesis and can differentiate along multiple lineages. In terms of eventual downstream application, both fetal HSC and MSC have advantages over their adult counterparts, including better intrinsic homing and engraftment, greater multipotentiality and lower immunogenicity."
I am not incorrect. There is NO CLINIC IN THE WORLD that isolates stem cells from abortion material. Yes, you can derive some stem cells from many sources, but most are inferior.
The paper you cited is from 2004, and is simply an exploratory thesis probably from a couple of people in the industry starting a clinic. Many clinics have been shut down over the past years because of fraud. The claims made in this paper are not substantiated.
I know plenty about stem cells, PRP, and platelet lysate. I am being treated here in the States next week.
That’s a pretty bold statement, since you don’t have any idea what’s happening in the black market. The technology available to the elites, is not even known by any of us plebs.
Cord blood donations or I guess in this case banking it, are promoted as a more ethical alternative to abortion stem cells. I don't know of much opposition to the practice in conservative circles. Frankly in theory it does seem fine. However this seems like a giant red flag that they're just using it to get baby blood. I wouldn't trust it unless you can do some serious homework on who is getting their hands on it. https://femtechinsider.com/chrissy-teigen-cord-blood-registry/
Read the fine print.
What does it say in the fine print?
I don't know, but I wouldn't sign anything related to this without reading the fine print.
Of course, but I thought you were suggesting you actually knew what was in the small print and it was nefarious.
There is no such thing as "abortion stem cells." In the case of umbilical or placental stem cell therapy done in Central and South America, these stem cells are obtained from pregnant women immediately following the birth of their child, who are part of a registry that certifies they are disease-free, and that their pregnancy conforms to certain standards.
Under absolutely no circumstances whatsoever are stem cells ever obtained from random abortions. Not only would that be unethical, but dangerous. In the U.S., stem cells are only obtained from bone marrow aspiration from the pelvis.
One can also "bank" stem cells for their children, obtained from placental material...but this is only useful for the child it was originally from.
Sorry, but you are incorrect. See below:
"Fetal stem cells can be isolated from fetal blood and bone marrow as well as from other fetal tissues, including liver and kidney. Fetal blood is a rich source of haemopoietic stem cells (HSC), which proliferate more rapidly than those in cord blood or adult bone marrow."
"First trimester fetal blood also contains a population of non-haemopoietic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), which support haemopoiesis and can differentiate along multiple lineages. In terms of eventual downstream application, both fetal HSC and MSC have advantages over their adult counterparts, including better intrinsic homing and engraftment, greater multipotentiality and lower immunogenicity."
Source:
PubMed Fetal stem cells
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15582543/#:~:text=Fetal%20stem%20cells%20can%20be,blood%20or%20adult%20bone%20marrow.
I am not incorrect. There is NO CLINIC IN THE WORLD that isolates stem cells from abortion material. Yes, you can derive some stem cells from many sources, but most are inferior.
The paper you cited is from 2004, and is simply an exploratory thesis probably from a couple of people in the industry starting a clinic. Many clinics have been shut down over the past years because of fraud. The claims made in this paper are not substantiated.
I know plenty about stem cells, PRP, and platelet lysate. I am being treated here in the States next week.
No clinic in the world.
That’s a pretty bold statement, since you don’t have any idea what’s happening in the black market. The technology available to the elites, is not even known by any of us plebs.
I would not discount it. These people are evil.