Could You Imagine the Outrage and the Resulting Sh*t Storm This Would Create ??😵💫😳🤨
(media.greatawakening.win)
LET'S GOOoOoooo!!!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
Nazis were National Socialists. They were leftists. If the tales of their use of ethnic cleansing are true, they were using the same forceful methodology as the Soviet communists who genocided millions.
You know who else rooted for Hitler? The Rothschilds. They wanted him to be a Judas goat for the German people. They wanted to see Germans overextended, spread thin, and defeated. They wanted tens of thousands of civilians in Dresden to get firebombed.
Lots of people here who hate the lgbt happily use government benefit programs. Socialism is not a deal breaker. Our farmers take farming subsidies. Right v. Left is not primarily about socialsim. It is primarily traditionalism vs. degeneracy, or religious values vs. anti-religious values.
Hitler was very traditional in his values, and Germany was a Christian nation. They were obviously on the Right as we primarily define it today. We don't define Right as a specific system of government, but an ideology with ideological values.
Regarding the elite and the Rothschilds, many people believe that they are using the Left as a tool of destruction and degeneracy, not necessarily because they firmly believe in Leftist values. They are the puppeteers, not the puppets.
“Right v. Left is not primarily about socialsim. It is primarily traditionalism vs. degeneracy, or religious values vs. anti-religious values.”
The topic of discussion has been the political spectrum, not the religious spectrum. “Left” and “right” are political terms, not religious terms. It was leftist commies who confused you about this. “Left” vs “right” is more about communism vs anti-communism than about personal degeneracy vs religious traditionalism.
The right is about respecting others’ liberty, and the left is about disrespecting others’ liberty by way of force. Degeneracy only becomes a political issue and relevant to the political spectrum when it is forced upon people, or when reactions to its consequences are forced on people. Then it’s on the left side, because initiation of force is a leftist value.
“Regarding the elite and the Rothschilds, many people believe that they are using the Left as a tool of destruction and degeneracy, not necessarily because they firmly believe in Leftist values.”
Forced destruction and degeneracy are leftist values, so when the “elites” use force they are being true believers in leftism.
Germany might be a Christian country, but Hitler the Rothschild puppet was into the occult. He used leftism to lead Christians to sin.
What you are proposing prevents me from looking at the Crusades as a cool thing that the religious right needs to do again, because it involved disrespectful "force" which you say is "leftist".
You are wrong, of course. Sometimes force is necessary. The founding fathers used force, Hitler used force, and the Crusades used force. It has nothing to do with "forced destruction" being an inherent property of leftism. This is your personal loony invention.
I said the initiation of force. Of course violence can be the proper reaction to others’ initiation of force. The crusades were supposedly to “reclaim” the holy lands, not to claim them for the first time. Islam only started several hundred years after Christianity did. Muslims taking the holy land was the initiation of force. Fighting back isn’t leftism. It’s respecting property rights in the rightwing tradition.
Hitler was authoritarian right. Or the moral dictator sort of. The fact that nazi Germans had socialist programs mainly comes from them being nationalistic. In nationalism you take care of your own, and that obviously involves charity and in this case, forced charity by the moral dictatorship. Of course morality is subjective but you understand the foundation for this explanation.