A Different Picture Of Tiananmen Square On It’s 34th Anniversary
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
The media is giving two different stories, one story in which the protestors were violent and one where they were not. You get your information from the media, choosing to believe one version over another, choosing to believe what they are lying about. This is intellectual dishonesty to continue to hold onto one story because it aligns with your views in the face of contradicting narratives.
Yeah, you're hopeless. One of those sources isn't even a liberal paper. They are also claiming two different narratives, because they no longer mention the protestor violence and imply that it was a naked act of aggression. Both stories can't both be true, but somehow you "know" which one is true, despite not being there. This is not intellectual honesty or a search for truth.
The Wall Street Journal article was from 1989 though. The Tiananmen Square incident happened in 1989.
The Wall Street Journal was a conservative newspaper in 1989, by your own admission above. Your mistake here proves that you have no idea what you are talking about and are making up shit to reinforce your predetermined narrative.