Um... if you're talking about commandeering private property, then no. It's the"slippery slope" that, if allowed, would lead to quartering them in private homes. Nip this one in the bud.
Nip it in the bud? I say slam the foot on the accelerator.
NYers need to see. Staten Island and the immigrants are sensible but the transplants need to experience the full retardation of their politics.
White hats always leave us an out. The virtue signalers will take in the immigrants for that $100. It'll seem great at first. A few months in the cash runs out and now their apartment is taken over due to squatters rights. Lesson learned on the part of those who most need it.
$100 a day pays the full rent for a huge # of apartments. A lot of folks will bite on this. It's also completely unsustainable to shell out $36k for free every year! Where on earth will the taxes for that come from?
Um... if you're talking about commandeering private property, then no. It's the"slippery slope" that, if allowed, would lead to quartering them in private homes. Nip this one in the bud.
Nip it in the bud? I say slam the foot on the accelerator.
NYers need to see. Staten Island and the immigrants are sensible but the transplants need to experience the full retardation of their politics.
White hats always leave us an out. The virtue signalers will take in the immigrants for that $100. It'll seem great at first. A few months in the cash runs out and now their apartment is taken over due to squatters rights. Lesson learned on the part of those who most need it.
$100 a day pays the full rent for a huge # of apartments. A lot of folks will bite on this. It's also completely unsustainable to shell out $36k for free every year! Where on earth will the taxes for that come from?
Yes! LFG!
This is another white hat lesson for the libtards. It also tees up a strengthening of private property rights when it's struck down. Win win, fren.
I like how you think ahead Fren. 👍