I am NOT a lawfag, but many anons ARE, and may find this news very interdasting. The SCOTUS is considering the viability of the Chevron doctrine. What is the Chevron doctrine?
From Wikipedia:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court set forth the legal test for determining whether to grant deference to a government agency's interpretation of a statute which it administers. The decision articulated a doctrine now known as "Chevron deference". The doctrine consists of a two-part test applied by the court, when appropriate, that is highly deferential to government agencies: first, whether Congress has spoken directly to the precise issue at question, and second, "whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute."
Chevron is one of the most important decisions in U.S. administrative law, and has been cited in thousands of cases since being issued in 1984.
--
This could have FAR-reaching implications on our every-day lives, as it originally had when it was decided.
Another example of ambiguity in the law, whereby Central government grabs the power, while they cannot, in practical terms, because in the end they are just shiny-assed bureaucrats, not real people.
These are steps back to the original Constitution. I guess it culminates in either 2025 when PDJT wants to start our birthday party or when it ends on Independence day 2026?
Remember the last SCOTUS case announced last June, after Dobbs got all the attention, was West Virginia v EPA. Writing has been on the wall.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXygwGxU/west-virginia-v-epa-is-decided-g/c/
This could impact the ATF's over reach and tyrranies
Oh, don't worry. We've already seen that the Biden admin as well as most of the rest of the feds don't care about the law as written, because they're all above it.
Thanks for sharing.
I enjoy reading despair summoning word spells.
WWG1WGA 😘
Keep your head in the sand, Fren. I appreciate the delusional optimism. Maybe I can learn a thing or two. :)
Hopefully you can AND will "learn a thing or two " Fren". :-)
To make that more likely, perhaps seek to control haughty spirit urges that result in conjuring up defensively dismissive assessments of anonymous strangers?
Example:
You're " delusional"...." Keep your head in the sand"
An agile pivot, "Fren"? Start by deploying despair summoning word spells. Shift to emulating a haughty, dominatrix. :-)
Fwiw, like Q+, I enjoy trolling and teasing.
#U2? #😘
wonder how this effects the ATF and how it wants to redefine categorizations and terms to make whatever it likes illegal to own.
They will interpret the word "and" and "or" to be the same when it benefits them.