Ps. Your description of the timeline element is confirmed by Q 2679. There is an inbuilt flexibility in the timeline, necessary because it unfolds via moves and countermoves. But once the key logistical positions (points of control, etc) are secured, then the game can be forced to proceed in a specific direction, so that it becomes not a matter of if, but when. But the idea of locking in certain events and dates is intriguing. I think that makes a lot of sense.
Also in a game of chess, a loss by the opponent can become a logical necessity within a set number of moves. If the cabal has been boxed into that type of an inevitable loss, then attempting to trigger a civil war would be equivalent to a chess player overturning the board and scattering the pieces to avoid the loss.
A chess player overturning the board and scattering the pieces necessitates that the player can reach out to flip the board.
My view is that the Patriots will have, of necessity, incorporated a plan that involved advancing the occupation of the game board in a manner such that by the time the Cabal realized they had no option except, for example, to initiate a 'civil war', that the Cabal would by then have no ability to do that.
If the chess player still thinks they can win or escape the situation, they keep attempting to do that in their own self-interest. But if at some point in the game, unbeknownst to them, their arms have been tied down to the chair and their legs have been bound and they cannot even flip the board, all they will do is swear, shout abuse, maybe attempt to roll over the chair. There may be some collateral damage, but minimizing such collateral damage at the right point will have to have been part of the original game plan by the Patriots.
And just another point, 'civil war'? Who the heck is the civil war going to be against? There are no equally armed, equally capable North vs South here, not in the population. The only possible conflict resembling all out war between two sides could be the US military vs the Population. That possibility would have been neutralized a long time ago before the plan could get to the stage where the Cabal thought they could viable do that. In my opinion.
I like the way you're thinking. You bring up some very relevant points.
It's not hopium, wolf, it's hopermectin
Sauce.
Ps. Your description of the timeline element is confirmed by Q 2679. There is an inbuilt flexibility in the timeline, necessary because it unfolds via moves and countermoves. But once the key logistical positions (points of control, etc) are secured, then the game can be forced to proceed in a specific direction, so that it becomes not a matter of if, but when. But the idea of locking in certain events and dates is intriguing. I think that makes a lot of sense.
Also in a game of chess, a loss by the opponent can become a logical necessity within a set number of moves. If the cabal has been boxed into that type of an inevitable loss, then attempting to trigger a civil war would be equivalent to a chess player overturning the board and scattering the pieces to avoid the loss.
A chess player overturning the board and scattering the pieces necessitates that the player can reach out to flip the board.
My view is that the Patriots will have, of necessity, incorporated a plan that involved advancing the occupation of the game board in a manner such that by the time the Cabal realized they had no option except, for example, to initiate a 'civil war', that the Cabal would by then have no ability to do that.
If the chess player still thinks they can win or escape the situation, they keep attempting to do that in their own self-interest. But if at some point in the game, unbeknownst to them, their arms have been tied down to the chair and their legs have been bound and they cannot even flip the board, all they will do is swear, shout abuse, maybe attempt to roll over the chair. There may be some collateral damage, but minimizing such collateral damage at the right point will have to have been part of the original game plan by the Patriots.
And just another point, 'civil war'? Who the heck is the civil war going to be against? There are no equally armed, equally capable North vs South here, not in the population. The only possible conflict resembling all out war between two sides could be the US military vs the Population. That possibility would have been neutralized a long time ago before the plan could get to the stage where the Cabal thought they could viable do that. In my opinion.