DeSantis is a globalist Trojan horse. Why would he even be in this race if he weren’t?
Most politicians talk a good game before they get elected. Then they fuck us and join the Satanic cabal. We already know Trump won’t do that.
When you said the spectrum isn’t useful at all you weren’t being truthful because you, I, and everyone else who read James Woods’ tweet understand exactly what he meant by “the left”. He meant the people who advocate coercion, and who are currently trying to coerce Trump.
People on the right are morally better because coercion is immoral.
“You either want to give more power to the state or you don’t.”
I pretty much agree with this statement, which means that you pretty much agree with the definition of the political spectrum because increased state power means more coercion.
RINOs are leftists.
“But you are assuming that people on the left support coercion. They don’t”
Yes they do, by definition. If the don’t support coercion, then they’re not leftists. Maybe I can help you more if you try to give me an example of someone you think is a leftist who doesn’t support coercion.
To use education as an example, the concepts of private schools and homeschooling are rightist because they’re voluntary. If someone believes a family’s educational budget should be forcefully removed via taxation and spent on the government’s monopolistic schools that the family’s children are forced to attend, then the person is a coercionist and therefore a leftist. The person might delude himself that he’s a bleeding heart who wants public education for all, but in practice he is being immoral.
If a person advocates a forced welfare state instead of allowing people the freedom to participate in voluntary charity, then the person is being coercive, immoral, and leftist.
Are you worried about recognizing the immorality in people you personally know who fancy themselves as bleeding heart do gooders but who believe in forceful and violent tactics? I’m worried about their souls, so I think pointing out that their beliefs put into practice are unnecessarily forceful and potentially violent might help them change their ways. Leftists don’t want to admit that they’re violent, but they are. Just like how someone who hires a hitman is also guilty of the murder even if the hirer doesn’t pull the trigger personally, people who use the government to take others’ taxes by force are violent even if they don’t issue the threats and execute the warrants personally.
Solid assessment by James - a true pioneer who is doing his best to ‘Red Pill’ the normies… Thank you James!
DeSantis is a globalist Trojan horse. Why would he even be in this race if he weren’t? Most politicians talk a good game before they get elected. Then they fuck us and join the Satanic cabal. We already know Trump won’t do that.
Fuck DeSatanist.
I don't agree with his point B but the rest of it is on target.
Can we stop saying Left or Right? That’s my fight in this.
These labels were created by the Cabal.
The labels were perverted by cabal. The spectrum can still be useful if you think of it as coercion on the left and voluntarism on the right.
It’s not useful at all.
Because humans aren’t static entities. It depends on situations on how someone might answer.
There is no set right or left.
coercion and voluntarism aren’t people
No.. but the left vs right is how people shift to the mindset they are morally better than the other side.
When you said the spectrum isn’t useful at all you weren’t being truthful because you, I, and everyone else who read James Woods’ tweet understand exactly what he meant by “the left”. He meant the people who advocate coercion, and who are currently trying to coerce Trump.
People on the right are morally better because coercion is immoral.
But you are assuming that people on the left support coercion.
They don’t.
Most of it is paid actors, media ops and activists groups.
We have to stop generalizations because it’s easier to think in simple labels like Left Or Right.
The argument also falls apart when the majority of republicans are RINOs.
I don’t use left or right.
You either want to give more power to the state or you don’t.
That’s it.
“You either want to give more power to the state or you don’t.”
I pretty much agree with this statement, which means that you pretty much agree with the definition of the political spectrum because increased state power means more coercion.
RINOs are leftists.
“But you are assuming that people on the left support coercion. They don’t”
Yes they do, by definition. If the don’t support coercion, then they’re not leftists. Maybe I can help you more if you try to give me an example of someone you think is a leftist who doesn’t support coercion.
To use education as an example, the concepts of private schools and homeschooling are rightist because they’re voluntary. If someone believes a family’s educational budget should be forcefully removed via taxation and spent on the government’s monopolistic schools that the family’s children are forced to attend, then the person is a coercionist and therefore a leftist. The person might delude himself that he’s a bleeding heart who wants public education for all, but in practice he is being immoral.
If a person advocates a forced welfare state instead of allowing people the freedom to participate in voluntary charity, then the person is being coercive, immoral, and leftist.
Are you worried about recognizing the immorality in people you personally know who fancy themselves as bleeding heart do gooders but who believe in forceful and violent tactics? I’m worried about their souls, so I think pointing out that their beliefs put into practice are unnecessarily forceful and potentially violent might help them change their ways. Leftists don’t want to admit that they’re violent, but they are. Just like how someone who hires a hitman is also guilty of the murder even if the hirer doesn’t pull the trigger personally, people who use the government to take others’ taxes by force are violent even if they don’t issue the threats and execute the warrants personally.