To an extent, yes. In this case, he could've done his thing independently of the CIA, and they filtered it and released what they saw fit. Or, they could have completely dictated terms and he cucked, Idk.
Livestreamers aren't CIA controlled. O'Keefe is basically a tier up from that. Small independent media outlets can grow bigger. At some point of funding they get corrupt, this is why I use the term MSM. So I'd offer the counterpoint that all MSM is D's controlled or at least influenced, and we have to find other sources.
Speaking of which, is O'Keefe back to doing good stuff? RSBN? OANN?
Newsmax was about as bad as Faux, but somebody said they've improved?
You can bet your bottom dollar the CIA has been trying to infiltrate those around O'Keefe. They were probably instrumental in the hijacking of project Veritas. In his departure from PV, O'Keefe showed a slide of him out camping with a personal friend. That friend was none other than RFK Jr - you could see those 2 on the slide.
So let me ask you, what is the likelihood that some guy that came out of nowhere & started what is described as a "far-right activist group" just happens to be personal friends with the top contender to Joe Biden for the Democrat nomination??
Personally, I think they are both working for the white hat team and have full white hat protection. If not, the CIA would have taken then both out by now.
For an important period of time, the Voice of America, for example, had an important role in countering the Soviet Marxist propaganda. The Soviet Union was a very real threat to the world and to world freedom.
Moreover, CIA infiltration of all media didn't happen in one year, or five, or ten.
It's a step to say someone heading Voice of America was CIA, compared with individuals who were actually CIA agents and operatives who then 'left' the agency and entered into Media.
In my view, there needs to be more corroborating proof than simply that he was head of VOA. It's a big claim. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, but the evidence is pretty limited and is purely argumentative (circumstantial).
True, there are shades of grey. Being required to communicate with the CIA at times is not the same as being completly controlled by them or working for them.
Maybe I should have said that the CIA has a watchful eye on all media & is ready to pounce on anyone who will subvert their narrative a little too much.
I'm inclined to think that there were (and even possibly still are) some employees of the CIA who actually thought they were doing a patriotic duty, and whose priorities were the well-being of the USA.
Perhaps, like most of our institutions, the CIA was corrupted over time, and manipulated from the Top Down. In most of our institutions, it was infiltration of the top and the levers of power that then hijacked those institutions to serve a purpose other than what they were ostensibly created for.
It's also possible to go about your life and not realize you're actually working for the CIA, especially if you have a job as a spokesperson for VOA. They deal in unknowns and less than total control. The main objective was to have the broadcast going, and this one guy wasn't 24/7.
I question if that means he was CIA. Isn't it possible he was just a radio guy, even if he was delivering the purposes of the CIA?
All media is CIA controlled
To an extent, yes. In this case, he could've done his thing independently of the CIA, and they filtered it and released what they saw fit. Or, they could have completely dictated terms and he cucked, Idk.
Livestreamers aren't CIA controlled. O'Keefe is basically a tier up from that. Small independent media outlets can grow bigger. At some point of funding they get corrupt, this is why I use the term MSM. So I'd offer the counterpoint that all MSM is D's controlled or at least influenced, and we have to find other sources.
Speaking of which, is O'Keefe back to doing good stuff? RSBN? OANN?
Newsmax was about as bad as Faux, but somebody said they've improved?
You can bet your bottom dollar the CIA has been trying to infiltrate those around O'Keefe. They were probably instrumental in the hijacking of project Veritas. In his departure from PV, O'Keefe showed a slide of him out camping with a personal friend. That friend was none other than RFK Jr - you could see those 2 on the slide.
So let me ask you, what is the likelihood that some guy that came out of nowhere & started what is described as a "far-right activist group" just happens to be personal friends with the top contender to Joe Biden for the Democrat nomination??
Personally, I think they are both working for the white hat team and have full white hat protection. If not, the CIA would have taken then both out by now.
In 2023. But when was Tucker's father involved?
For an important period of time, the Voice of America, for example, had an important role in countering the Soviet Marxist propaganda. The Soviet Union was a very real threat to the world and to world freedom.
Moreover, CIA infiltration of all media didn't happen in one year, or five, or ten.
It's a step to say someone heading Voice of America was CIA, compared with individuals who were actually CIA agents and operatives who then 'left' the agency and entered into Media.
In my view, there needs to be more corroborating proof than simply that he was head of VOA. It's a big claim. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily, but the evidence is pretty limited and is purely argumentative (circumstantial).
True, there are shades of grey. Being required to communicate with the CIA at times is not the same as being completly controlled by them or working for them.
Maybe I should have said that the CIA has a watchful eye on all media & is ready to pounce on anyone who will subvert their narrative a little too much.
I'm inclined to think that there were (and even possibly still are) some employees of the CIA who actually thought they were doing a patriotic duty, and whose priorities were the well-being of the USA.
Perhaps, like most of our institutions, the CIA was corrupted over time, and manipulated from the Top Down. In most of our institutions, it was infiltration of the top and the levers of power that then hijacked those institutions to serve a purpose other than what they were ostensibly created for.
It's also possible to go about your life and not realize you're actually working for the CIA, especially if you have a job as a spokesperson for VOA. They deal in unknowns and less than total control. The main objective was to have the broadcast going, and this one guy wasn't 24/7.