Jack Smith Did It Again! Grand Jury Not Told About Clinton Socks Case or Presidential Records Act - The Great Awakening

Jack Smith Did It Again! Grand Jury Not Told About Clinton Socks Case or Presidential Records Act (www.thegatewaypundit.com) - N C S W I C -

posted 1 year ago by Fringe--dweller 1 year ago by Fringe--dweller +234 / -0

Jack Smith Did It Again! Grand Jury Not Told About Clinton Socks Case or Presidential Records Act | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim ...

On Tuesday before his arraignment by his political rival Joe Biden, President Trump posted on Social this stunning remark: President Trump: THE GRAND JURY WAS NEVER TOLD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTIAL RECORDS ACT OR THE CLINTON SOCKS CASE, BOTH EXONERATING!

40 comments

40 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (40)

sorted by:

▲ 21 ▼

– Mister_Winston 21 points 1 year ago +21 / -0

I suspect that this entire episode involving Trump's documents has the intended purpose of striking down the Clinton Socks verdict. They'll sacrifice that verdict to get at Trump, which will then set the precedent for going after Hillary's server, the Obama library, Bush's documents, Clinton's documents, Biden's documents. They stole them to conceal their own crimes.

So this is the real declass. Because no one, not even Trump, can declassify documents that former presidents have stolen. This will bring them all back so they can be revealed to the world.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– jasqid 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

This is the chess game being played. right here.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q