Remember, you were told that phrase. It's not like you were shown incontrovertible truth from God. You didn't get into a time machine and go to the future to be shown it was in fact their symbols that caused their ruin. As if you know for certain that if they didn't use so much corny symbolism, they'd have won it all.
Imagine you were a billionaire. And you were fluent in two languages:
English
English, in a way that won't hold you accountable in a Court of Law
Which language would you speak, if you were doing anything nefarious? Anything potentially embarrassing? Anything that involves the government or justice system itself?
It is actually entirely logical that such a language would come to fruition with the rise of the printed press, and later, the telegraph and HAM radio.
Unfortunately I wasted a lot of time by reading a lot of them, it is utter drivel. You can downvote all you like b/c of you support the guy, but again, be careful of who you prop up as an expert or go to source.
The problem with this guy is he thinks EVERYTHING is a symbolic representation of something else, well it isn't, some things, actually a lot of things are simply what they are. When you have that mindset, you start seeing connections everywhere that simply do not exist. It's akin to people who have racism in their blood, someone makes a simple mistake and bumps into their grocery cart, and they think it was a racist act of aggression, not believing the person just wasn't looking careful when they came to the corner of the aisle.
Holy crap, I have a wooden bookcase in my office, that must mean I am a tree spirit worshipper, or liking my eggs over easy means I am gripping on to life too tightly b/c eggs represent the start of life. That is the level stupid of the majority of his "research".
Not saying anymore or getting pulled into your white knighting for a moron.
The problem with this guy is he thinks EVERYTHING is a symbolic representation of something else, well it isn't, some things, actually a lot of things are simply what they are.
Meanwhile, he never says that.
"When you learn comms you realize the path forwards is not in trusting someone else, but in developing critical thinking and then trusting yourself."
AND
"Clearly, there is dishonesty in some sectors of professional science, and you might be inclined to reject it all, but that’s no good either.
If you go too far you end up in a fantasy world with no tether to reality."
He also states when things he says are guesses, and readily admits when he got something wrong.
This is how you can see who is likely a shill or maybe someone with mental illness, ot someone too excited with their new snobby identity that helps them feel in the know and finally accepted as a part of a group.
Have you read any of his decodes? Remember symbolism will be their downfall. https://qalerts.app/?q=Symbolism
Remember, you were told that phrase. It's not like you were shown incontrovertible truth from God. You didn't get into a time machine and go to the future to be shown it was in fact their symbols that caused their ruin. As if you know for certain that if they didn't use so much corny symbolism, they'd have won it all.
Imagine you were a billionaire. And you were fluent in two languages:
Which language would you speak, if you were doing anything nefarious? Anything potentially embarrassing? Anything that involves the government or justice system itself?
It is actually entirely logical that such a language would come to fruition with the rise of the printed press, and later, the telegraph and HAM radio.
Unfortunately I wasted a lot of time by reading a lot of them, it is utter drivel. You can downvote all you like b/c of you support the guy, but again, be careful of who you prop up as an expert or go to source.
The problem with this guy is he thinks EVERYTHING is a symbolic representation of something else, well it isn't, some things, actually a lot of things are simply what they are. When you have that mindset, you start seeing connections everywhere that simply do not exist. It's akin to people who have racism in their blood, someone makes a simple mistake and bumps into their grocery cart, and they think it was a racist act of aggression, not believing the person just wasn't looking careful when they came to the corner of the aisle.
Holy crap, I have a wooden bookcase in my office, that must mean I am a tree spirit worshipper, or liking my eggs over easy means I am gripping on to life too tightly b/c eggs represent the start of life. That is the level stupid of the majority of his "research".
Not saying anymore or getting pulled into your white knighting for a moron.
Meanwhile, he never says that.
"When you learn comms you realize the path forwards is not in trusting someone else, but in developing critical thinking and then trusting yourself."
AND
"Clearly, there is dishonesty in some sectors of professional science, and you might be inclined to reject it all, but that’s no good either.
If you go too far you end up in a fantasy world with no tether to reality."
He also states when things he says are guesses, and readily admits when he got something wrong.
This is how you can see who is likely a shill or maybe someone with mental illness, ot someone too excited with their new snobby identity that helps them feel in the know and finally accepted as a part of a group.