I remember tons of coverage of it as it approached NYC. What made me mad is so much of the damage could have easily been prevented (blocking up subway station entrances, moving equipment on ground levels up one floor). My office had a field station on the water, and could have moved their computers and other equipment up fairly easily, but did nothing, and lost everything. The water was about 4 feet high in the building at the height of the surge. If the storm had not hit at high tide, it would have caused minimal damage (tide range of about 6 feet).
A cold front came down and pushed the hurricane out to sea. An almost reliable phenomenon for hurricanes heading for the NE U.S.
Sometimes I can't tell if people on this site are joking when they promote some of the things here, or if they really believe it. And then the question is, "Are these people here to distract from the truth by appearing to be nut cases?"
I believe it seeing as some reliable sources like Truth Stream Media covered it. I found them to be pretty honest and truthful from what I’ve watched.
And knowing what I know about weather warfare and weather tech, and their ability to slam “super storm Trade Mark” after super storm into the gulf coast leading up to the Vegas Massacre, it seems not that unlikely that an under reported hurricane the morning of 9/11 was diverted.
This is an old thread you and I are the only ones seeing and discussing this topic so I have no way of Laing us look like nut cases!
They may be ability to alter individual thunderstorms, but a cold front, which is the leading edge of a giant mass of colder air, is not possible to control.
I remember tons of coverage of it as it approached NYC. What made me mad is so much of the damage could have easily been prevented (blocking up subway station entrances, moving equipment on ground levels up one floor). My office had a field station on the water, and could have moved their computers and other equipment up fairly easily, but did nothing, and lost everything. The water was about 4 feet high in the building at the height of the surge. If the storm had not hit at high tide, it would have caused minimal damage (tide range of about 6 feet).
What are you talking about? I’m referencing the storm which was about to hit NYC right on 9/11 but did a full 180 and turned around.
9/11 was clear sunny skies. No storm damage no surges, just a plan that was able to go through uninterrupted.
I'm talking about this: https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/weathermatrix/the-weather-of-9-11/532534
A cold front came down and pushed the hurricane out to sea. An almost reliable phenomenon for hurricanes heading for the NE U.S.
Sometimes I can't tell if people on this site are joking when they promote some of the things here, or if they really believe it. And then the question is, "Are these people here to distract from the truth by appearing to be nut cases?"
I believe it seeing as some reliable sources like Truth Stream Media covered it. I found them to be pretty honest and truthful from what I’ve watched.
And knowing what I know about weather warfare and weather tech, and their ability to slam “super storm Trade Mark” after super storm into the gulf coast leading up to the Vegas Massacre, it seems not that unlikely that an under reported hurricane the morning of 9/11 was diverted.
This is an old thread you and I are the only ones seeing and discussing this topic so I have no way of Laing us look like nut cases!
They may be ability to alter individual thunderstorms, but a cold front, which is the leading edge of a giant mass of colder air, is not possible to control.