911 cgi glitch
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Have you not seen how brainwashed people are? And show me the 38,000 people. I don't know any.
But whatever. Either way, at least we agree on the controlled demo part. that part is pretty clear cut.
You don't know any?
Look, don't you think New Yorkers would be the first people telling the world there were no planes, long before internet sleuths who saw some rando video with provably false assumptions?
The CGI shit is a deliberately planted distraction to prevent people from investigating the REAL plot and the REAL plotters.
Hit my link in the comments. Dov Zakheim. He's the guy, and if this is the first time you've heard his name, you have not done due diligence.
A 1 kW UHF TV transmitter broadcasting from the top of a mountain with a huge antenna doesn't get anywhere near the 40 mile range advertised for that remote control system. Also, there's a lot of tall buildings in the area to mess with the signals. That might make those last second maneuvers a bit challenging for a remote operator.
There was not a guy with a joystick guiding the plane in. Laser guided technology. The 'planes' were guided missiles, essentially.
https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/smart/lgb.htm
I like that explanation a little better. But I still don't see how a laser dot makes the wings tilt at the end of the journey.
You should publish all this somewhere online, rather than point out little bits and pieces here and there. Apologies if you have already.
Anyhow, so lemme see if I got it right. The UHF control is for the majority of the flight and there's an agent somewhere near the towers painting a laser target for the flight termination system? And they used bigger engines special ordered for just these planes that don't throw off the balance like those troublesome large GE engines did with the 737 Max.
I'll put this on the list of possibilities, but we're not at the top yet.