Why did H-wood glorify TITANIC as a tragic love story?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
I think it applies to what we've been told about the Titanic. Q said something about most plane crashes were not accidents. Same thing here.
I haven't seen a deep dive on the people who were on the Titanic. Maybe someone did one, I just haven't seen it. Would be interesting to see how it lines up with the current cast of DS characters.
A is probably Astor
Was that B Gates maternal family? I need a scorecard to track all the crime families involved...
John Jacob Astor (born Johann Jakob Astor; July 17, 1763 - March 29, 1848) was a German-born American businessman, merchant, real estate mogul, and investor who made his fortune mainly in fur trade. At the time of his death in 1848, Astor was the wealthiest person in the United States, leaving an estate estimated to be worth at least $20 million, or 0.9% of estimated US GDP at the time. Astoria, Oregon (setting of The Goonies) is named after him.
His great-grandson John Jacob Astor IV (July 13, 1864 – April 15, 1912) was an American business magnate, real estate developer, investor, writer, lieutenant colonel in the Spanish–American War, and a prominent member of the Astor family. He died in the sinking of the Titanic during the early hours of April 15, 1912.[1] Astor was the richest passenger aboard the RMS Titanic and was thought to be among the richest people in the world at that time, with a net worth of roughly $87 million (equivalent to $2.64 billion in 2022) when he died. Supposedly, he opposed the formation of the Federal Reserve.
(D or A) I believe means dead or alive.
Maybe. Why use capitalized abbreviations? ‘dead or alive’ is a general-enough term that it can be spelled out explicitly without causing much fuss. Everyone already admits that some Titanic people died and some lived. Q usually uses abbreviations for proper nouns such as people’s or nations’ names.
I think Q said 7 out of 10 plane crashes were not accidents. Makes me think about all crashes that have happened since the birth of flight.
If it is true, let him provide the evidence. I am getting tired of knowledge by divine pronouncement. (Crashes by design failure or improper maintenance count as accidents.)
Q is a military Intelligence Service. By law, they can't disclose information obtained through their methods. Q skirted the law by asking questions anyone could ask, but carry more weight based on the source of the question. Q expects anons to dig for information based on the questions asked.
We suspect Q is connected to military intelligence, but it is not definitely established. If Q can't disclose information (including conclusions) obtained through their methods, then why is Q disclosing it? If anons are supposed to dig for information, where is the evidence? It is almost like Q pronouncements are Holy Writ. Who cares about verification, when we can take it for granted?
A good example is the mysterious missile launch from Puget Sound. Plenty of opining about what it was, most of which was nonsense (e.g., that it was fired at Air Force One). My own analysis, as far as I was able to take it (before being interrupted), was that its launch azimuth was approximately due north. The implication was that it may have been an attempt to spook the Russians with a not-so-false-flag attack. Supposedly, the SLBM was intercepted with a "package" purpose designed for the task. (Implying that there is a fighter Cap over the sub base at all times, to guard against an erroneous launch.) I think I put it on view, but no one took it up. That's okay. But I walked the walk, so don't give me the talk.