To all you cheering Russia on
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Perhaps you do not realize that Q said
-
Russia is working against Trump and on the side of Obama/Clinton (#1538)
-
Putin is controlled by the cabal (#15)
And they are now allies with China, who are working with democrat leadership "in joint ops... to regain power" (#4620)
Many on here want to place everyone in one of two camps good vs evil, and then assume that these categories neatly map onto geopolitical/domestic interest. As Q says, "expand your thinking".
Do a search for “Putin” on 8Kun and I think you’ll find just the opposite! Here’s one example:
1081 Apr 08, 2018 12:09:57 PM EDT Q !xowAT4Z3VQ Apr 08, 2018 11:29:24 AM EDT Anonymous Apr 08, 2018 11:25:51 AM EDT Anonymous
Most of the other post comment on the fact the the D’s/[DS] were panicked anytime Trump met/talked with Putin!
I ascribe to this theory that has been put on the uranium one deal.
It goes like this: Brennan delivered to the Russians yellow cake uranium. That uranium would have a unique chemical signature. No name delivered yellow cake uranium to ISIS in Syria with that same unique chemical signature. They intended to set off a dirty bomb on the Syrian population blame it on Assad, and point to the Russians as the source for the uranium.
I believe this theory is true, and I think the delivery of that uranium to ISIS got No Name executed.
I agree with this theory as well. The “Sum of All Fears” scenario. Also, my litmus test weather someone is a puppet, pawn or DS is how that individual is treated in the media. Putin, Trump, etc. are hated and vilified (hence there’s a good chance thery’re WH’s) while Zelenskyy, Macron,Trudeau, etc. are praised (hence they’re DS.). IMO.
It is really that simple. Xi is a curious case though because Trump has/had good relations with him, Soros hates him, but Klaus/WEP sucks him and China off. He's like EM, we just can't definitively put of thumb on which side they stand.
ISIS target was South Carolina port; not Syria
You can't make a dirty bomb with yellow cake uranium. It's not really dangerous.
They used to make dinner plates that were glazed with uranium.
It's not really dangerous. It's not good to breathe in the dust of it, but lots of dusts you should breathe in.
Dirty bombs are not necessarily about being dangerous. They are also about scaring the public. The average idiot out there has probably heard of uranium or at least radiation, and would absolutely freak out if a bomb exploded that had anything resembling radiation. It doesn't matter of it is dangerous or not - the public will be terrified.
Basically the same idea as "regular" terrorism. Guys in robes attack somewhere and kill a couple people, or throw acid on women and everyone is sure the terrorists are everywhere and will get them too if they go outside and live life. They don't have to kill a ton of people - just a few and the fear will run it's course.
Ironic that that fear was not shown of the vaxx-only because the enemy was disquised in white lab coats. And the results were much more effective than a dirty bomb.
So was Brennan executed?
It doesn't appear that way to me, but then he didn't deliver uranium to terrorists, but in my opinion his actions are still treason, and he deserves execution for it.
I like that one.