Prigozhin being the fraudster and Con Artist he is, played the US in believing the coup. I'm waiting for the news that the CIA paid him lots of money to make it happen. After all, the mobilization of an all too well documented coup traveling unfettered, only to stop 200 km from Moscow for a deal of exile to Belarus, is exactly what coup leaders do.
How many times do tanks need to refuel in such a trip? Who provides the fuel? How hard would it be to interdict the column, or even better, interdict the fuel supply?
Lol-coup.
Although now we can see why it failed. Russians still have diesel tanks, not the new Bidette all-electric tanks the US woke army will get by 2030. Electric tanks don't need fuel!
That's the 'thing'. There was never any evidence of tanks on the move. There were however light transport vehicles though. And if that was the case, it's not much of an indication of a 'punch' or 'force' for winning a coup. In other words, it is more signs of a Russian PsyOp.
Prigozhin being the fraudster and Con Artist he is, played the US in believing the coup. I'm waiting for the news that the CIA paid him lots of money to make it happen. After all, the mobilization of an all too well documented coup traveling unfettered, only to stop 200 km from Moscow for a deal of exile to Belarus, is exactly what coup leaders do.
Rostov to Moscow is 1000+ kilometers.
How many times do tanks need to refuel in such a trip? Who provides the fuel? How hard would it be to interdict the column, or even better, interdict the fuel supply?
Lol-coup.
Although now we can see why it failed. Russians still have diesel tanks, not the new Bidette all-electric tanks the US woke army will get by 2030. Electric tanks don't need fuel!
Climate change strikes again.
That's the 'thing'. There was never any evidence of tanks on the move. There were however light transport vehicles though. And if that was the case, it's not much of an indication of a 'punch' or 'force' for winning a coup. In other words, it is more signs of a Russian PsyOp.