Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution. - The Great Awakening

261

Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution. 🚔 Crime & Medical Tyranny 💸

posted 1 year ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve 1 year ago by aslan_is_0n_the_m0ve +261 / -0

https://slaynews.com/news/ex-who-official-raises-alarm-global-pandemic-treaty/

This includes caving to the WHO on treatments, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and government surveillance.

Under the treaty, the WHO would have the power to lock the public in their homes or censor the American people in violation of their First Amendment rights, overriding the Constitution.

Even more chillingly, the White House wants to bypass submitting this agreement for Senate approval.

The Biden admin argues that it is not an official treaty despite it having the full force of one.

In a seminal discussion before the Pandemic Response and Recovery All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) in the UK, leading health experts raised serious concerns over the WHO’s new powers.

Dr. David Bell, a former WHO senior medical officer, and Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, who chairs Global Health Policy at the University of Leeds, raised the alarm over the sweeping new powers that the WHO will be granted.

They outlined how the proposals could reshape the dynamics between the WHO and its member nations and imperil critical health initiatives.

The contentious point revolves around the unprecedented authority these proposals could vest in the WHO.

According to Dr. Bell, the WHO could wield the power to demand hefty financial contributions from countries, suppress scientific discourse, and enforce travel restrictions, lockdowns, and compulsory vaccinations in response to health emergencies, which the body can declare at its discretion.

Bell explained the transformation of the WHO since its inception in 1946.

indicative of political, rather than scientific, decision-making.

Stringer stressed that the potential impact on public health, democracy, civil liberties, and individual rights necessitates rigorous debate and transparent review.

Both experts and parliamentarians conveyed the urgent need for caution and thorough analysis of the WHO’s proposed changes, calling for countries to retain autonomy in addressing public health challenges, and for the protection of global health initiatives from undue influence.

82 comments

82 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (82)

sorted by:

▲ 13 ▼

– Speak2Truth 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

No Treaty can give the Federal Government new power over the American People. Only an amendment to the Constitution can legally do so.

Treaties govern how the US interacts with foreign nations.

Amendments to the Constitution govern how the US interacts with its own people.

The Framers of the Constitution were not so stupid as to say that if The People would not grant a new Federal Power, then the President could make a deal with a foreign nation to get that new Federal Power.