Did the US pay the Wagner mercenary group over 6 billion dollars?
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (30)
sorted by:
i have been saying this since the wagner guys started it. They played it out until the money was delivered then went muh back to base. I bet putin was aware and went along with it because hey, 6 billion is 6 billion. And it helped route out the traitors in the russian mil/gov :) Rootin for Putin.
About the same amount as that recent "accounting error" of arms and equipment going to Ukraine.
Exactly!
The timing of the Russian 'coup' and the Pentagon 'accounting error' was suspect I must say.
I believe no planes and were involved. That's why Air Force didn't intercepted any. Pentagon was hit by a rocket exactly were documents were stored. Allegedly one of the plane crash in a open field without any debris to be found. If a plane hit a twin tower you must have scrap all around the building for hundreds yards. No parts has been found.
They are all so fkg busted. Lies caught up with them and are biting them in the ass.
Flight 77 was an airplane, was tracked by radar departing from airport and turning to head toward Pentagon, was identified as an airplane by multiple witnesses on the ground (and one in the air), clipped traffic light poles, and hit the building. Parts were found. Not a rocket. Not even a missile, as it followed the wrong terminal trajectory.
Plane crashes can pretty much obliterate the wreckage, particularly if the plane had a dive angle and punched into the earth. Human beings are much more fragile than metal parts. Ever heard of hamburger?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1RmWaANwiook/
Yes ok Mr I know everything. BTW do we land on the moon?
"Do" we? Time will tell. But we did 50 years ago, if that is any consolation.
By the way (duh), the video confirms the fact that the airplane was obliterated. Just because the reality does not conform to how ignorant people think a plane should crash does not mean that their ignorance supersedes reality. "Oh, it couldn't do that!" is an all too-common exclamation from the ignorant, who have no expertise in what could or could not happen. Or who, in any case, prefer their imaginations to reality.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6GN9txdjdSeq/
This image is nothing but blurs. The airplane is mainly a fuselage (polished aluminum) visible as a streak, the wings having the same brightness as the ground background and therefore not particularly visible. (Matching background sky brightness was an Army Air Force research project for airplane invisibility in World War II. It worked perfectly, but was effective only in the direction it was designed for.)
How stupid are you? Pretty damn stupid, because there is no way in the world a Scud missile could fly such a trajectory. (I would happen to know, because I have modeled those trajectories.) And anyone who knew anything about Scuds would also know that. Tell me then why Flight 77 was radar-tracked from takeoff to crash? And why no one noticed a Scud launch? You are a category of person who will deny the facts in front of your face.
You don't even know what are you talking about. We have the photo of the original hole and was 8 feet max. How your theory can survive a little hole of 8 feet? https://www.bitchute.com/video/44fhZo2ZiEZ1/
And an inexperienced pilot can fly a 747 at over 400 miles an hour into a low profile building. Got it.
Since Flight 77 was a 757, you are already off to a bad start. They did it, but it resulted in destruction. Can't argue with success.