I have an infuriating normie friend whose whole opinion on whether the jabs are dangerous is predicated on his lived experience, with no consideration of qualitative inquiry. So because no one he knows “died of the jab”, they’re safe even though the “died suddenly” and “died in his sleep” stories across all age groups in his local media are everywhere. He arrives at this view because he thinks every jab is produced identically, without ever trying to understand pharma manufacturing processes, why there is so much variability across phenotypes, looking at howbadismybatch, researching the microbiology of spike, learning about vaccine industry fraud (Turtles All The Way Down), why iatrogenesis is the #3 killer after cancer and heart disease, why the scientific literature has produced over 2400 peer reviewed papers studying Covid jab adverse reactions, the whistleblowers, subject matter experts, personal testimonies, the work of people like Ed Dowd and Naomi Wolf and yes, Steve Kirsch etc etc.
Sometimes absolutes are just absolute because of the weight of absolute truth, not to mention prima facie and circumstantial evidence.
Around 2.8 million ppl die in America each year and 10% are in their sleep, that’s 280,000.
In the US. there’s an average of 315,000 death by cardiac arrest each year.
If one day a group of ppl begins to be told that the US is having a lot of sudden deaths and then all of sudden that group starts to pay attention to this phenomenon they will be able to find sudden deaths all over the place. Ppl die suddenly all of the die.
If you wanted to start a false campaign so to blame deaths on a certain thing it would be very advantageous to point at sudden deaths as being caused by whatever it is you’re wanting to throw shade on.
Also, I’m saying it’s a “psyop” to make ppl think the jab is dangerous, so having a bunch of ppl online and doing speaking engagements telling ppl it’s dangerous would definitely be feasible in the realm of it being a psyop. For many decade the world has been under a psyop with ppl in the highest positions lying to us about all sorts of things and this definitely includes medical. If that’s possible (we all know it is) then it’s also possible that the ppl today telling us that the Covid jab is a killer could be part of a white hat psyop to get ppl to think differently about big pharma.
To me this makes a lot more sense than believing white hats didn’t have the ability to stop a genocidal jab from being released (“we have everything, we caught them all”). Or, that white hats had to allow this because somehow it’s stupid people’s fault for taking it.
The Q op shows us that there was complete infiltration into every aspect of the cabal. The Q op tells us every precaution was taken to protect the American people, but you’re telling me the Q op missed this one or somehow had to allow it while at the same time the Q team had big pharma by the ballz.?.
All good, interesting points. If a black hat cabal can go to the sort of lengths required to perpetrate a mass genocidal atrocity in plain sight - whether bioweapon pathogens or jabs or lockdowns or economic devastation or terrorising the masses - while psyoping most of the planet to not even see it, it’s perfectly plausible a white hat cabal could pull off the converse, using more or less the same inputs but instead psyoping a great awakening while keeping the masses safe and taking out the black hats. I am onboard with that possibility - that’s why I am here, after all - I guess I am in a paradigm where I am not yet seeing enough evidence of awakening but I am seeing evidence of mass atrocity, however skewed or contrived either of my perspectives are. And yes, this does suggest good people have had to watch innocents be slaughtered, if this is the war to end all wars.
I speak my mind here and expect others to speak their mind here, too.
The thing is, I’ve come to a place where the only thing I’m feeling 99% about is that we are in the midst of a positive psyop. But, even there I leave a 1% chance that we are all being fooled.
From my perspective the plan was developed to leave an air of doubt until the time for a grand reveal and that, in itself, might not be just one moment in time where the curtain is finally pulled back. If it’s anything like the rest of the plan it will be a series of revelations but instead of being spread out over an extended period of time it will be compact compared to what we have been experiencing, but still not all in one moment.
This seems to be the safest bet to not shocking too many ppl at one moment resulting in mass panic that could bring on the burning down of the developed world.
I find this aspect of the plan to be the most fascinating and beautiful part. It shows a level of respect for humanity regardless of political and societal views. It’s a wonderful thing and I’m truly grateful to be able to witness it from this perspective🙏🏼🇺🇸
And your absolutely right, I definitely haven’t witnessed the damage firsthand.
I have an infuriating normie friend whose whole opinion on whether the jabs are dangerous is predicated on his lived experience, with no consideration of qualitative inquiry. So because no one he knows “died of the jab”, they’re safe even though the “died suddenly” and “died in his sleep” stories across all age groups in his local media are everywhere. He arrives at this view because he thinks every jab is produced identically, without ever trying to understand pharma manufacturing processes, why there is so much variability across phenotypes, looking at howbadismybatch, researching the microbiology of spike, learning about vaccine industry fraud (Turtles All The Way Down), why iatrogenesis is the #3 killer after cancer and heart disease, why the scientific literature has produced over 2400 peer reviewed papers studying Covid jab adverse reactions, the whistleblowers, subject matter experts, personal testimonies, the work of people like Ed Dowd and Naomi Wolf and yes, Steve Kirsch etc etc.
Sometimes absolutes are just absolute because of the weight of absolute truth, not to mention prima facie and circumstantial evidence.
Around 2.8 million ppl die in America each year and 10% are in their sleep, that’s 280,000.
In the US. there’s an average of 315,000 death by cardiac arrest each year.
If one day a group of ppl begins to be told that the US is having a lot of sudden deaths and then all of sudden that group starts to pay attention to this phenomenon they will be able to find sudden deaths all over the place. Ppl die suddenly all of the die.
If you wanted to start a false campaign so to blame deaths on a certain thing it would be very advantageous to point at sudden deaths as being caused by whatever it is you’re wanting to throw shade on.
Also, I’m saying it’s a “psyop” to make ppl think the jab is dangerous, so having a bunch of ppl online and doing speaking engagements telling ppl it’s dangerous would definitely be feasible in the realm of it being a psyop. For many decade the world has been under a psyop with ppl in the highest positions lying to us about all sorts of things and this definitely includes medical. If that’s possible (we all know it is) then it’s also possible that the ppl today telling us that the Covid jab is a killer could be part of a white hat psyop to get ppl to think differently about big pharma.
To me this makes a lot more sense than believing white hats didn’t have the ability to stop a genocidal jab from being released (“we have everything, we caught them all”). Or, that white hats had to allow this because somehow it’s stupid people’s fault for taking it.
The Q op shows us that there was complete infiltration into every aspect of the cabal. The Q op tells us every precaution was taken to protect the American people, but you’re telling me the Q op missed this one or somehow had to allow it while at the same time the Q team had big pharma by the ballz.?.
Fren,,, that dog don’t hunt😎
All good, interesting points. If a black hat cabal can go to the sort of lengths required to perpetrate a mass genocidal atrocity in plain sight - whether bioweapon pathogens or jabs or lockdowns or economic devastation or terrorising the masses - while psyoping most of the planet to not even see it, it’s perfectly plausible a white hat cabal could pull off the converse, using more or less the same inputs but instead psyoping a great awakening while keeping the masses safe and taking out the black hats. I am onboard with that possibility - that’s why I am here, after all - I guess I am in a paradigm where I am not yet seeing enough evidence of awakening but I am seeing evidence of mass atrocity, however skewed or contrived either of my perspectives are. And yes, this does suggest good people have had to watch innocents be slaughtered, if this is the war to end all wars.
Oh man,, I really like that response.
I speak my mind here and expect others to speak their mind here, too.
The thing is, I’ve come to a place where the only thing I’m feeling 99% about is that we are in the midst of a positive psyop. But, even there I leave a 1% chance that we are all being fooled.
From my perspective the plan was developed to leave an air of doubt until the time for a grand reveal and that, in itself, might not be just one moment in time where the curtain is finally pulled back. If it’s anything like the rest of the plan it will be a series of revelations but instead of being spread out over an extended period of time it will be compact compared to what we have been experiencing, but still not all in one moment.
This seems to be the safest bet to not shocking too many ppl at one moment resulting in mass panic that could bring on the burning down of the developed world. I find this aspect of the plan to be the most fascinating and beautiful part. It shows a level of respect for humanity regardless of political and societal views. It’s a wonderful thing and I’m truly grateful to be able to witness it from this perspective🙏🏼🇺🇸