Research Wanted
Jon Herold of Badlands Media and the Devolution series posted some interesting factoids worthy of anon attention:
He references a video recently posted by Dan Scavino on Twitter; June 28, 2023.
In the video, we can see someone in DJT's entourage who is carrying a black bag with a tag indicating that the bag belongs to an active military personnel. It happens to be very similar to the bag being carried by a military aide, who in that image is carrying both a very similar bag and also the 'nuclear football'.
The questions here include:
1 Would non-active military personnel be permitted to use a military identifying tag for a bag like this? If the person was former military, could they still use such an identifying tag (which is reportedly air force in this case)?
2 Do former presidents have military aides? We know they have secret service assigned to them, but military aides?
Another potentially less relevant question is:
3 Is there any connection between the President's emergency satchel aka 'nuclear football' and this other bag being carried by, and identified to, the military aide? If so, what is that connection?
Regardless of 3), the real questions here are 1) and 2), because if the answers to these questions are 1) NO and 2) YES, this would be a very clear devoproof, that in fact DJT is still serving in a presidential capacity, either as Chief Executive and/or as Commander In Chief.
Also, if 1 = NO and 2 = YES, then 3 becomes more interesting. Who or what is this fellow accompanying DJT and why.
Patel Patriot discusses this in last week's episode of Devolution Power Hour W/ Burning Bright and Just Human (JH was absent). Start 1:39:28 ~ 1:47:00. Around 8 minutes in total.
Patel Patriots thread on this on Twit is here: https://twitter.com/patel_patriot/status/1673819404415520769
EDIT: note - this was brought to the surface first (apparently) by "Mechanic" on twitter https://twitter.com/justamechanic17/status/1673817241492627456
EDIT: apologies for twitter links. Was unaware that twitter is now blocking access to tweets unless the viewer is logged in. In future, will take this into account, and provide alternate access to data.
If you aren't signed in or don't have an account, apparently, they've stopped allowing access to see tweets.
Do tell! Well, I didn't know that. I've NEVER been a tweeter but have been able to read postings. Ah well, another rabbit hole I don't need to go down. Ta ta, Twitter.
Nitter has been rendered useless by this.
Hope it boosts Truth social as well
I agree. Twitter is useless to me and I refuse to provide my identity and personal information for reading or watching a video. In the final analysis, anonymity will be found as being extremely important for one's self-preservation.
Gulp. I didn't know that. Links to the Twit in future posts will be augmented by non-twitter references and sources so that everyone can view and examine the content.