Seems frazzledrip is making rounds
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (307)
sorted by:
No, you're not wrong.
The video and stills being referenced were completely sauceless and so riddled with artifacting it was very difficult to ascertain what anyone was viewing.
Also worth mentioning, several anons seem to be mixing up separate habbenings:
Security Cam stills from Rachel Chandler's IG (supposedly Little St James Island) & the relevant Q post(s).
Comet Ping Pong Heavy Breathing videos
Fake ass Frazzlenuts hype and illegitimate "clips & stills" shared by known Fake News PAYtriots at the time. E.g. Alex Jones using old stock footage as a thumbnail and insinuating it to be frazzlecrap.
IMO no one here has seen any type of authentic video. They are misremembering what they saw or trusting unverified sources.
May not even be either of those two things.
Could have been misinformed by someone else, and so it kept spreading on false terms.
Yeah I can easily understand that. Those that fervently follow disinfo outlets tend to support bunk narratives and trends cumulatively.
All kinds of garbage alt news outlets have ran with this topic over the years. IMO it's bait, and always has been. "Look, those silly Qsters are at it again..." NPR & VICE propaganda intensifies
What's interesting is that Frazzledrip has been used to reference the supposed Podesta video too.
I remember being confused when it seemed to reference several different videos depending on what community it was being posted to.
Really drives the point home; people will hear one person say something, and then repeat it to someone else and suddenly Frazzledrip is a Magic Schoolbus episode or something.
The rumor mill can be a cruel mistress.
At this point, if it were real, we would not be hearing from sketchy people "wandering through the dark web". We would have seen a lot more of it all over the place. It is impossible to totally scrub the internet once something has been put there to proliferate.
I completely concur with all of your points. This one though is where the brass tax is.
Another interesting caveat to this frazzled tale is the only, and I do mean only semi credible source we have on file is Erik Prince discussing the supposed nature of the media's contents. THATS IT. Everything else is either unrelated, has been lumped together as such by proxy (e.g. R. Chandler drops) or is sauceless.
And if Im not mistaken, Prince wasn't speaking verbatim about the supposed Frazz video. He was talking about Weiner's laptop. And even then, the outlet was of course Brietbart (long after they were comped given the death of Andrew in 2012 and the audio SXM interview was during the 2016 campaign madness).
I feel if it had existed I would have seen it, and also shared it with others. I believe the same as you.