The site of the temple mount is not the site of the temple. The 'Wailing Wall' is the remnant wall of the Roman Fort Antonia.
And you should already know it is the anti-Christ's temple that will be built at the Temple Mount. This is not the location where Solomon's temple once existed. It neither fits the location or the dimensions. Lastly, such a temple requires water to wash away the blood of frequent sacrifices. The Temple Mount has none of these, but Solomon's temple did.
Interestingly, the Temple Mount is built on the highest point in the area suggesting an ideal location for a defense fortification. In Roman records such a place did exist and was the Roman Fort Antonia. As it turns out the historical record also tells us that the Temple Mount is built on the ruins of the Roman Fort Antonia.
The bible tells us Solomon's temple had a spring called the 'Gihon' spring that provided the water for the frequent sacrifices at the temple. The Temple mount has no evidence of a spring. Solomon's temple is recorded to be in the center of Jerusalem. The Temple mount was outside of Jerusalem. There is however a spring in Jerusalem that was discovered and was concealed by building a tunnel to protect it from enemies.
Several sources (Roman, Greek, and Jewish, etc.) record that the Romans completely erased the Temple from its existence where "No stone was left unturned". The Romans destroyed and carried away every last piece of the Temple in AD 70. In 2000 years of research, excavation and exploration including a protracted search by the Templars, not ONE single artifact from the Temple of Jerusalem has ever been found. Even the inscription found at Hezekiah's tunnel gives proof that the Haram is NOT the site. The overwhelming evidence continues to prove the Dome of the Rock location is NOT the location where Solomon's temple once existed. Yet, the Temple mount will continue to be the site of the 3rd temple.
Knowing this, it's preposterous to believe that the Romans would leave a fortified wall; the so-called "Wailing Wall", for people to worship at, when the records clearly state that all traces of the temple were completely removed. It is clearly a Herodian structure. Josephus who as a child worshipped in the temple and saw the destruction of it wrote that nothing was left. Every stone was hauled away. It was as if the temple never existed.
How did the Dome of the Rock site and the 'Wailing Wall' located there become 'known' to be believed as the site of Solomon's temple?
The history of the 'Wailing Wall' is remarkable story. History tells us that every stone of Herod's temple was removed and carried away. Even the historian Flavius Josephus who lived in Jerusalem and knew exactly where Herod's temple once stood, later saw the aftermath of its total destruction, in which he stated that it was like it never existed. Every stone was removed and taken away. After the Roman defeat of the Judeans, the location of the temple was completely lost.
There was no worship at the Western wall until well after the time of the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent came into power in the mid-1500s. Intrigued by its disappearance, he ordered a search of Jerusalem for it. Meir Ben Dov's book -- "The Western Wall" records how it was actually found. He writes:
"In the days of the king Sultan Suleiman nobody knew the location of the Temple, so he ordered a search of Jerusalem to find it.
One day, a man in charge of the search who had already given up hope, saw a woman coming and on her head was a basket full of garbage and filth.
"What is on your head?" he asked.
"Garbage" she said.
"Where are you taking it." "To such-and-such a place"
"Where are you from?"
"From Bethlehem"
"And between Bethlehem and this place are there no garbage dumps?"
"We have a tradition that anyone who brings garbage and dumps it here is performing a meritorious work"
"This must be it" said the man and ordered many men to clear out the garbage from that spot, garbage which, because of the great time that had passed, had turned the earth at the bottom. And so he uncovered the holy place. He went and told the king who rejoiced greatly and ordered them to clean and sweep (the place) and wash the Wall with rose-water."
Rabbi Eliezer Nahman Puah ( Abboth de-Rabbi Nathan (A) 31. and Medrash Bahidush, 1641 p.31a) is reported to have stated in c. 1540 that in the day of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent (1495c -1566), the site of the Temple was unknown and he carried out an extensive search for it. A wall was finally found beneath a public garbage heap and everyone rejoiced that the site of the Holy Temple had been found.
This is the site of the Wailing Wall today!
Ironic, no? It is not only the wrong site (for this reason and many others), but it happens to be the remaining wall of the Roman Fort Antonia, and it was used as garbage heap. Karma? No, it's False Israel.
Every aspect of the 3rd temple, if and when it is built, will be a forgery. And we know what this means......
Another thing to ponder, is I guarantee you, as usual, they evil ones will prey on and hope for people’s laziness and ignorance to keep this covered up. It doesn’t even take all that long to find this information. I did so some years ago and don’t remember it taking very long. But, then again, a lot of people either don’t care or don’t want to hear it.
Quite right. A very good source that's no longer available, but can be found here is Bible Mysteries.. This was through the Wayback machine. If you or anyone else get a chance, we ought to archive these pages at Archive.today and other places.
Thanks. A very good source that's no longer available, but I found here is Bible Mysteries. I'm disheartened the website is not there right now. I was able to find it through the Wayback machine though. If you or anyone else get a chance, we ought to archive these pages at Archive.today and other places.
In a way, it makes sense that it would be "a meritorious work" to dump garbage at the walls of an abandoned Roman fort. That's a long-lasting grudge. But why would anyone want to dump garbage at a wall from Solomon's Temple?
One, it was no longer Solomon's temple, but became spiritually destitute and became Herod's temple. When Titus sacked Jerusalem, nothing was left of the temple. No wall, no foundation, every stone was removed. It is recorded from many sources that the temple was completely dismantled and every last stone was taken away. Josephus seeing the aftermath said it was though it never existed. There is a very good reason why it's location soon became forgotten. There was nothing to remind people of where it once stood.
It's false Israel..... the temple mount is not the location of Solomon's temple or is it's 'Wailing Wall'. Read my comment to understand.
To meet the requirements of the Old Testament law, a red heifer was needed to help accomplish the purification of the Israelites from uncleanness—specifically, the ashes of a red heifer were needed (see Numbers 19).
Scripture explicitly contrasts the red heifer ceremony with the greater sacrifice of Christ: “The ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!” (Hebrews 9:13–14).
The red heifer is purely a Talmudic interpretation, not Christian because Christ has provided us Him, who was unblemished and cleanses us from sins.
We've sent many perfect red heifers to Israel from Texas & Oklahoma. However, they frequently develop white tufts of fur on their hides as they age. Others damage their hides on barbed wire or trees. They must be perfect red heifers without any flaws. Personally, I suspect that one of their offspring that was actually born and raised in Israel will someday fit the bill.
According to this article they’ve got a few that are flawless for now but still have another year, year and a half to go to be beyond the three year mark that is required of the sacrifice rules apparently.
I’m definitely no saint, but do believe Jesus is the savior, my savior, and hopefully he’ll find me worthy enough to join him and all the others in victory at the end.
The papacy is the antichrist and always has been. Every pope.
Israel is not Israel either.
Don't believe the hype! [They] will orchestrate the fulfillment of "prophecies" (false fulfillments / already happened) because they know a couple billion people are expecting it, and they can then manipulate them all at once into whatever...
Jesuit lies will fail! There is no rapture. Godspeed frens
The site of the temple mount is not the site of the temple. The 'Wailing Wall' is the remnant wall of the Roman Fort Antonia.
And you should already know it is the anti-Christ's temple that will be built at the Temple Mount. This is not the location where Solomon's temple once existed. It neither fits the location or the dimensions. Lastly, such a temple requires water to wash away the blood of frequent sacrifices. The Temple Mount has none of these, but Solomon's temple did.
Interestingly, the Temple Mount is built on the highest point in the area suggesting an ideal location for a defense fortification. In Roman records such a place did exist and was the Roman Fort Antonia. As it turns out the historical record also tells us that the Temple Mount is built on the ruins of the Roman Fort Antonia.
The bible tells us Solomon's temple had a spring called the 'Gihon' spring that provided the water for the frequent sacrifices at the temple. The Temple mount has no evidence of a spring. Solomon's temple is recorded to be in the center of Jerusalem. The Temple mount was outside of Jerusalem. There is however a spring in Jerusalem that was discovered and was concealed by building a tunnel to protect it from enemies.
Several sources (Roman, Greek, and Jewish, etc.) record that the Romans completely erased the Temple from its existence where "No stone was left unturned". The Romans destroyed and carried away every last piece of the Temple in AD 70. In 2000 years of research, excavation and exploration including a protracted search by the Templars, not ONE single artifact from the Temple of Jerusalem has ever been found. Even the inscription found at Hezekiah's tunnel gives proof that the Haram is NOT the site. The overwhelming evidence continues to prove the Dome of the Rock location is NOT the location where Solomon's temple once existed. Yet, the Temple mount will continue to be the site of the 3rd temple.
Knowing this, it's preposterous to believe that the Romans would leave a fortified wall; the so-called "Wailing Wall", for people to worship at, when the records clearly state that all traces of the temple were completely removed. It is clearly a Herodian structure. Josephus who as a child worshipped in the temple and saw the destruction of it wrote that nothing was left. Every stone was hauled away. It was as if the temple never existed.
How did the Dome of the Rock site and the 'Wailing Wall' located there become 'known' to be believed as the site of Solomon's temple?
The history of the 'Wailing Wall' is remarkable story. History tells us that every stone of Herod's temple was removed and carried away. Even the historian Flavius Josephus who lived in Jerusalem and knew exactly where Herod's temple once stood, later saw the aftermath of its total destruction, in which he stated that it was like it never existed. Every stone was removed and taken away. After the Roman defeat of the Judeans, the location of the temple was completely lost.
There was no worship at the Western wall until well after the time of the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent came into power in the mid-1500s. Intrigued by its disappearance, he ordered a search of Jerusalem for it. Meir Ben Dov's book -- "The Western Wall" records how it was actually found. He writes:
"In the days of the king Sultan Suleiman nobody knew the location of the Temple, so he ordered a search of Jerusalem to find it.
One day, a man in charge of the search who had already given up hope, saw a woman coming and on her head was a basket full of garbage and filth.
"What is on your head?" he asked.
"Garbage" she said.
"Where are you taking it." "To such-and-such a place"
"Where are you from?"
"From Bethlehem"
"And between Bethlehem and this place are there no garbage dumps?"
"We have a tradition that anyone who brings garbage and dumps it here is performing a meritorious work"
"This must be it" said the man and ordered many men to clear out the garbage from that spot, garbage which, because of the great time that had passed, had turned the earth at the bottom. And so he uncovered the holy place. He went and told the king who rejoiced greatly and ordered them to clean and sweep (the place) and wash the Wall with rose-water."
Rabbi Eliezer Nahman Puah ( Abboth de-Rabbi Nathan (A) 31. and Medrash Bahidush, 1641 p.31a) is reported to have stated in c. 1540 that in the day of Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent (1495c -1566), the site of the Temple was unknown and he carried out an extensive search for it. A wall was finally found beneath a public garbage heap and everyone rejoiced that the site of the Holy Temple had been found.
This is the site of the Wailing Wall today!
Ironic, no? It is not only the wrong site (for this reason and many others), but it happens to be the remaining wall of the Roman Fort Antonia, and it was used as garbage heap. Karma? No, it's False Israel.
Every aspect of the 3rd temple, if and when it is built, will be a forgery. And we know what this means......
Another thing to ponder, is I guarantee you, as usual, they evil ones will prey on and hope for people’s laziness and ignorance to keep this covered up. It doesn’t even take all that long to find this information. I did so some years ago and don’t remember it taking very long. But, then again, a lot of people either don’t care or don’t want to hear it.
Quite right. A very good source that's no longer available, but can be found here is Bible Mysteries.. This was through the Wayback machine. If you or anyone else get a chance, we ought to archive these pages at Archive.today and other places.
Excellent writing, fren. Yes, I already knew most of what you stated here. Glad others will be able to see this now.
Thanks. A very good source that's no longer available, but I found here is Bible Mysteries. I'm disheartened the website is not there right now. I was able to find it through the Wayback machine though. If you or anyone else get a chance, we ought to archive these pages at Archive.today and other places.
Responding to yourself?
No I added another comment later to Tewdryg
In a way, it makes sense that it would be "a meritorious work" to dump garbage at the walls of an abandoned Roman fort. That's a long-lasting grudge. But why would anyone want to dump garbage at a wall from Solomon's Temple?
One, it was no longer Solomon's temple, but became spiritually destitute and became Herod's temple. When Titus sacked Jerusalem, nothing was left of the temple. No wall, no foundation, every stone was removed. It is recorded from many sources that the temple was completely dismantled and every last stone was taken away. Josephus seeing the aftermath said it was though it never existed. There is a very good reason why it's location soon became forgotten. There was nothing to remind people of where it once stood.
Well then we will be outta here soon.
7 Day Forecast: Tribby, with a chance of rapture.
It's false Israel..... the temple mount is not the location of Solomon's temple or is it's 'Wailing Wall'. Read my comment to understand.
To meet the requirements of the Old Testament law, a red heifer was needed to help accomplish the purification of the Israelites from uncleanness—specifically, the ashes of a red heifer were needed (see Numbers 19).
Scripture explicitly contrasts the red heifer ceremony with the greater sacrifice of Christ: “The ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who are ceremonially unclean sanctify them so that they are outwardly clean. How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!” (Hebrews 9:13–14).
The red heifer is purely a Talmudic interpretation, not Christian because Christ has provided us Him, who was unblemished and cleanses us from sins.
We've sent many perfect red heifers to Israel from Texas & Oklahoma. However, they frequently develop white tufts of fur on their hides as they age. Others damage their hides on barbed wire or trees. They must be perfect red heifers without any flaws. Personally, I suspect that one of their offspring that was actually born and raised in Israel will someday fit the bill.
According to this article they’ve got a few that are flawless for now but still have another year, year and a half to go to be beyond the three year mark that is required of the sacrifice rules apparently.
There's no escape, you have to man up and stand.
Jesus Christ and His conquerors.
Love that stuff!
I’m definitely no saint, but do believe Jesus is the savior, my savior, and hopefully he’ll find me worthy enough to join him and all the others in victory at the end.
Not sure if it is the same group but someone has been pushing variations of this red heifer story for more than 15 years.
The papacy is the antichrist and always has been. Every pope.
Israel is not Israel either.
Don't believe the hype! [They] will orchestrate the fulfillment of "prophecies" (false fulfillments / already happened) because they know a couple billion people are expecting it, and they can then manipulate them all at once into whatever...
Jesuit lies will fail! There is no rapture. Godspeed frens