I saw this post today attributed to Jack Posobiec tweeting about the Sound of Freedom movie: https://greatawakening.win/p/16bimWAo9E/this-is-unreal-jackposobiecw/c/
The irony is that Jack Posobiec, along with Alex Jones, are the biggest gatekeepers for child trafficking out there.
Sauce:
In the since-deleted tweet above, Jack said this:
Russiagate, Melaniagate, Pizzagate, and Tucsongate are all examples of mass hysteria, from both left and right. We've consistently called them out since 2016 and will continue to do so
He said if you believe in Pizzagate or Tucsongate, you fell for mass hysteria, i.e. you're delusional because Pizzagate never happened and the child trafficking camp in Tucson Arizona never happened.
The entire push by media regarding pizzagate back in 2016 was to change its real meaning (elites around the world trafficking and sexually abusing children and referencing them with pizza-related code terms) into a fake framing of the issue (it's not worldwide, it's only one single pizza joint in DC named Comet Pizza, where it supposedly has a basement but the basement doesn't exist).
Jack, along with Alex Jones, was a gatekeeper helping to invoke that changed meaning of pizzagate.
The "Tucsongate" he's referring to was about: Back in 2018 there was a child trafficking camp found in Tucscon Arizona with child restraints found on trees of property owned by the Cemex company.
Jack got himself in front of the story so that he could ultimately call it a hoax.
https://cathyfox.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/poso.png
Have looked into this and can report there is no hard evidence this site in Tucson was used for child trafficking, the same as I reported there was no evidence for Comet Pizza. Appears to be another example of mass hysteria.
Here is a great, extensively sourced article on the subject: https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2020/10/09/child-trafficking-part-1-tucson-child-trafficking-camp/
Then there's Wayfair. We all know about how Wayfair sold rugs and other high-end items super expensive, where the items had the names of missing children (the implication was that Wayfair was being used to traffic those children).
Jack called it a Hoax: https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1285339013650493441
Now the Wayfair hoax is making it harder to fight actual child trafficking
Keep in mind, when you see Jack Posobiec credited for news or linked as a news source, what a complete Mossad piece of shit pro-child-trafficking influencer and gatekeeper he is.
I am reluctant to label Posobiec as an enemy.
He served under Flynn: https://t.me/Jack_Posobiec/24700
Flynn's sister is working directly with Liz Crokin (the reporter who had the balls to expose pizza gate).
Liz Crokin was at Mar A Lago on 12/7/22. https://t.me/LizCrokinReport/1567 Posobiec was at Mar A Lago on 1/7/23. https://t.me/Jack_Posobiec/21177
Trump put a lot of support behind Liz and the Flynns and it made the news...if Trump thought that Posobiec was trying to discredit the news regarding child abuse Trump would not have invited him and his wife less than a month later.
There was also a show on about a year ago where Posobiec and Bannon were talking about how they believed that Epstein's island and his other properties were CIA honey traps.
I don't think he is a child trafficking denier.
I gave 3 different instances where he was gatekeeping child trafficking, pizzagate, Tucson and Wayfair.
More ...
Q called him out directly as a Mossad asset. Epstein was also a Mossad asset.
https://qalerts.app/?n=2089
Posobiec was caught tweeting directly from CIA headquarters.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170620180848/https:/twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/874776260014202880
Tens of thousands served under Flynn.
Q already told us Epstein island was a Mossad honey trap.
Controlled opposition has an appearance of agreeing with you some of the time. That's so you're more inclined to listen to them when they influence you away from targets they don't want you focusing on.
Think about it.
How does Posobiec know that trafficking camp was never, at any time in the past, used for child trafficking? Why brow-beat others into submission, shaming and humiliating them over having an opinion that is completely unknowable from his perspective. That's what a gatekeeper does.
How does Posobiec know that those super-expensive rugs on Wayfair that were named after missing trafficked children weren't actual human trafficking. It's completely unknowable from the public's perspective. At best, it's guesswork from either side. So why does he shame and humiliate people for speculating that it might be child trafficking?
That Jack Posobiec hung out with patriots or visited Mar a Lago means nothing for his credibility, he wouldn't be a very good controlled opposition gatekeeper if he didn't make any effort to mingle with other patriots.
And finally, Posobiec went out of his way to destroy Q, fabricating a story that a friend Microchip was Q and that his friend was just trying to fool people with an elaborate hoax (which lead Q to directly call out Posobiec several times).
Q called Posobiec fake MAGA.
this douche-nozzle was also the clown who pushed the whole gate-keeping theory that mods on 4chan were the ones who started Q, basically making the whole thing an insignificant online troll. Him and Jones tried to give this theory clout. Which, if i'm not mistaken, resulted in Q calling them out. Interesting times.
Hmmm. Good points all.
I think there are probably arguments for both sides.
He may well be a controlled opposition, but it is also possible that as the Great Awakening moves forward, he has begun to think differently.
There will be literally kazillions who once thought Y who, later on, learn that Y was actually Z. Without that, there can be no Great Awakening.
It's critical that as we move forward, to allow for that to happen.
Also, someone who is in the public domain, with a significant voice, well, when they make mistakes, those mistakes are amplified.
So:
Posobiec might be controlled opposition, a serious part of Conservative Inc (establishment controlled 'conservative' voices)
or
Posobiec might have been controlled opposition, aka an asset, but who has now flipped
or
Posobiec might have been a poorly informed and asleep denizen of the Matrix who is one of the beneficiaries of the every increasing Great Awakening
Edit:
Or
Posobiec might actually be a white hat double agent, posing as controlled opposition for the Mossad.
(As such, to downplay any of those radical 'conspiracy theories' like Pizzagate, Wayfair, etc, would be a necessary step in order to maintain identity as a 'good' Mossad agent.)
If someone is good controlled opposition, they'll attempt to keep their cover as much as possible. A lot of controlled opp has been outed by the past two years. What is Posobiec's stance of Trump for '24?
Also, I recall when 'Tuscon camp" was discovered and became news. It was in 2018, when we were still on Reddit r/greatawakening. I recall it raising a LOT of noise, but then was pulled apart fairly successfully by anons, and ended up being disproven aka 'debunked' by the anon collective, if I recall correctly.
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2020/10/09/child-trafficking-part-1-tucson-child-trafficking-camp/
The above article is an extremely accurate accounting of everything that happened, including those who argued against it.
Regardless of what is really happening behind the scenes, Q labeled the guy as being bad. That being the case, for all intents and purposes he is bad.
Yep, I don't have an issue with that aspect. I was just making a comment about the Tuscon affair, which stands alone imo, and not saying that this exonerates or legitimizes Posobiec.
As for Q, well, we always have to apply discernment, understanding and reasoning. "Expand your thinking."
5G war, things are very often used for war purposes (including information). So personally I think we have to apply discernment to what Q writes, and not simply fall into a space where "Q said X so that means X is obviously true".
That's literally contradicts what Q exhorts us to do, which is to NOT take our thought processes from authority (even Q). (Q3906 https://ibb.co/H7CYkv2)
You've raised many good points, and the whole Microchip affair seems exceedingly bad to me. But after close to 6 years of processing information, learning to reexamine and rework my thinking and hypothesis hundreds of times over, I just don't take things at face value until I've done the hard yards.
I haven't paid a lot of attention to Posobiec, never have, so I'm not going to be as informed as others. Doesn't mean I'll take others opinions as gospel, tho.
The process of the Tuscon affair I experienced in realtime as we were all following the board and the news and many stories shot up like wildfire before being taken down. (Kek, a lot of anons were really greenhorns in those days!) So I'm going mostly by what was common conclusions at the time.
I tend to be less suspicious than some folk, and think "maybe this person is just ignorant and wrong", but I've come to learn I've been wrong about a good number of gatekeepers and controlled oppo, so (kek) I'm inclined to think I'm probably wrong about Posobiec as well when I think maybe he's not controlled oppo.
But I'd rather be wrong about thinking someone is innocent when they are not than I would be about thinking someone is guilty when they are not.
Carry on.