Trump is in on it, you claim you're teaching people to "think for themselves" but drop bread crumbs that lead them into circles or to predetermined conclusions (so they make arguments like yours, passionately believing they're being a free thinker while not actually being one), and I'm not sure if it's from Q or anons but heresy is mixed into the Christianity being promoted which seems like a good way to be a wolf in sheep's clothing.
I'm not saying I believe that, although regarding heresy (such as "our souls are eternal [not immortal] and chose to be here at this time") I've called it out on this board a few times and have never been given biblical justification, just downvoted and told I'm wrong with no argument.
Believing it's a malicious psyop is not as hard to rationalize as you think
I truly cannot understand people who get so angry anytime they hear something that runs counter to their thoughts & beliefs.
How fragile, how big a snowflake one must be to get literally triggered by words.....
I truly want to ensure I'm right / factually correct; not confirm my biases, so heck yes I want to listen to countering arguments.
I think the preponderance of evidence points to Q being real & positive for us, but am definitely not 1000% sure.
SO why would "they" have even started Q & The Great Awakening?
Why even open that door?
Before then - pre-2017 - 99.8% of the population - incl. most here - were happily asleep, or at best 25% awake to the reality Q has in large part helped us discover.
Why wouldn't [they] continue to just do business as usual? We were all relatively happy & sleepy in our litle worlds of sportsball, work, "Red vs. blue" etc.....why rock that boat AT ALL??
I have multiple concurrent theories and beliefs because there's not enough information to be conclusive about any of them. The one I currently feel strongest about is that this was part of the "control both sides" plays that the establishment has been doing forever. The internet obviously needed to be coopted, and they needed to corral the conspiracy theorists who were really figuring out a lot. I think people here give Q too much credit for the amount of awakened people. Back during the initial Pizzagate research our reach was massive. And there were many people awake on the Internet even before that. I remember being very young and having esoteric conversations with people even on gamefaqs (so young that I lies about being 13 to engage). People were not happy with sports ball and what not, cracks were showing, the left and right were converging onto the true enemy as both the eventually coopted occupy wall street and tea party demonstrated. Many many people knew we were up against evil. So, why not change the narrative and say someone is secretly fighting this evil? It pacifies the people to reduce the chance of random actions (like attacks on events such as the bilderberg meetings) while allowing you to slip through people like Elon who can play the part of being a good guy while pushing all the same things we know are bad. You destroy any chance of people uniting by every loss being written off as a white hat plan.
Trump is in on it, you claim you're teaching people to "think for themselves" but drop bread crumbs that lead them into circles or to predetermined conclusions (so they make arguments like yours, passionately believing they're being a free thinker while not actually being one), and I'm not sure if it's from Q or anons but heresy is mixed into the Christianity being promoted which seems like a good way to be a wolf in sheep's clothing.
I'm not saying I believe that, although regarding heresy (such as "our souls are eternal [not immortal] and chose to be here at this time") I've called it out on this board a few times and have never been given biblical justification, just downvoted and told I'm wrong with no argument.
Believing it's a malicious psyop is not as hard to rationalize as you think
Interesting.....Thanks for the food for thought....
No problem thanks for thinking about it and not taking it personally
I truly cannot understand people who get so angry anytime they hear something that runs counter to their thoughts & beliefs.
How fragile, how big a snowflake one must be to get literally triggered by words.....
I truly want to ensure I'm right / factually correct; not confirm my biases, so heck yes I want to listen to countering arguments.
I think the preponderance of evidence points to Q being real & positive for us, but am definitely not 1000% sure.
SO why would "they" have even started Q & The Great Awakening? Why even open that door?
Before then - pre-2017 - 99.8% of the population - incl. most here - were happily asleep, or at best 25% awake to the reality Q has in large part helped us discover.
Why wouldn't [they] continue to just do business as usual? We were all relatively happy & sleepy in our litle worlds of sportsball, work, "Red vs. blue" etc.....why rock that boat AT ALL??
What's your theory?
I have multiple concurrent theories and beliefs because there's not enough information to be conclusive about any of them. The one I currently feel strongest about is that this was part of the "control both sides" plays that the establishment has been doing forever. The internet obviously needed to be coopted, and they needed to corral the conspiracy theorists who were really figuring out a lot. I think people here give Q too much credit for the amount of awakened people. Back during the initial Pizzagate research our reach was massive. And there were many people awake on the Internet even before that. I remember being very young and having esoteric conversations with people even on gamefaqs (so young that I lies about being 13 to engage). People were not happy with sports ball and what not, cracks were showing, the left and right were converging onto the true enemy as both the eventually coopted occupy wall street and tea party demonstrated. Many many people knew we were up against evil. So, why not change the narrative and say someone is secretly fighting this evil? It pacifies the people to reduce the chance of random actions (like attacks on events such as the bilderberg meetings) while allowing you to slip through people like Elon who can play the part of being a good guy while pushing all the same things we know are bad. You destroy any chance of people uniting by every loss being written off as a white hat plan.