Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on this. The psychosomatic angle can perhaps explain why people experience similar symptoms as others, aided by fear, but it doesn't explain illness where there is no knowledge of others experiencing symptoms.
A lot of theories look to small-scale outbreaks from hundreds of years ago as explanation, but there don't seem to be any modern equivalents. The case about the sailors on a ship experiencing the same illness as natives on shore (was it Cuba?), when there was no landing party, comes to mind. I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed, or similar agents attributed to different cases just because they occurred at the same time.
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease. As this article did, she exposed how frail the evidence is for a tick-borne illness, but didn't offer an alternative explanation. Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment? She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
All these diseases attributed to mosquitos and ticks, depend upon the parasites biting a host of a disease first, infecting themselves, then passing along the infection to a second victim. I think it's safe to say that these smaller parasites (insects or arachnidae) very rarely feed twice as would be required. They either feed once successfully and lay eggs, or they fail to find a host in the time required, and die. They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis, and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed
Agreed on this! I'd say most were, right up until this very day I might add. Cooties-1984 as the most obvious exemplar!
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease
Dr. Sam Bailey - wonderful on boogyeman-viruses, but she's lost in "terrain theory" nonsense.
but didn't offer an alternative explanation
Because she can't offer any explanations as a terrain theory advocate. But I will. Lyme is primarily a self-devaluation conflict. And you'll notice, middle-aged women are most prone to it, as societal "standards" are devastating to their sense of worth. Whenever there's a rash involved, this is always a separate conflict, namely a separation conflict.
Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment?
Any such tick bite can produce a standard histamine response. This has absolutely nothing to do with "lyme dis-ease" however, which is a made up thing, just like malaria, just like all "auto-immune" disorders as well. It's all lies. There's no such thing as an "immune system", and our bodies are so remarkably intelligent that suggesting they "mutate" or "attack themselves" is literally the height of absurdity. We're awash in an endless amount of lies!
Besides, well over 90% of people who think they have "lyme dis-ease" never report the so-callled "tell tale" tick bite to begin with.
She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
Yep, this is the classic "conspiracy theory" psyop for the truther community. They always run one for the normies and one for the truthers. It's all bunk.
Have you been diagnosed with lyme?
They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
They don't. The entire parasite story is also a lie. Shocker, eh? Parasites form symbiotic relationships with their hosts. There is something "in it" for both of them. The many gut parasites perform a valuable service, removing toxic waste that the person is unable to eliminate due to other conflicts they're suffering.
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis
I used to. Now I understand it fully. There were no "bacterial attacks" as we have been led to believe. This has never been shown to be true. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied. Something else happened. I wrote all about it here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqU7uaXt/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
I too have heard the story of polio being caused by lead-arsenate and DDT. They may have contributed. I cannot dispute it because no actual proof has been presented. it's a theory. I've also heard the polio jabs themselves contributed to the issues. That too may be possible. We've never seen any definitive proof on either, and probably never will.
There is another explanation though. Motor conflicts are caused by severe self-devaluations. Think MS, ALS, parkinson's, osteoperosis, myalgia, neuropathy and a whole host of others. All eventually lead to paralysis. Could the children of the 1940s and 1950s been so frightened by parents, doctors, teachers, etc. that they began to fear they may have "contracted polio"? Certainly this is possible. And certainly, this did happen. Perhaps not for all cases, but some.
Another great trick of the conventional medical establishment is that they can and often do change the names of their diagnosis to give the appearance that a certain "viral dis-ease" has been eradicated. You don't have to look to far to see how blatantly they did this with almost zero cases of flu registering in 2020 and 2021. They clearly did this with polio too.
Dis-eases like ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease or motor neuron disease), Multiple Sclerosis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome are all clinically indistinguishable from "polio".
Once you learn their tricks, you can start to see through the lies. Good on you for doing your own research, asking questions, and not blindly believing the pseudo-experts. Our doctors have all been profoundly miseducated. They know not what they do or say.
When Q said "those you trust the most....", he wasn't kidding.
Thank you again for your lengthy analysis! You've certainly spent a lot of time thinking this all through.
I've been suffering from a broad-spectrum autoimmune condition for about fifteen years. It was triggered by long-term exposure to formaldehyde fumes coming from a new sofa we purchased. It took years for me to figure it out, mostly because we travel from home so infrequently. But on those occasions when we did, I began to feel better, and then I began learning about toxic environmental fumes in the home, etc. I realized there was an odor coming from the sofa after my body heat warmed it, so I purchased a test kit, which confirmed that the amount of formaldehyde was extremely high.
But even after stripping the sofa to the frame and rebuilding it with safe materials, the damage was done. The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull. I know this because I can feel it, as do others who suffer from this type of specific inflammation. Everyone describes it the same way. It does respond to treatments geared towards migraine.
Having lived with this for a number of years, I can feel what's happening inside me preceding an attack. I can feel the histamines/cytokines going berserk after being exposed to certain triggers. Some of the symptoms mimic lupus, although I test negative for that. As a matter of fact, one of the triggers is being studied here in Florida, and is associated with red tide.
I never expected this condition, never knew about it, and am not a fearful person by nature. After I discovered it, I found out about the class-action lawsuits by airline stewardesses exposed to formaldehyde via their permanent-press uniforms, and the class-action lawsuit against Lumber Liquidators for their laminated flooring, among others.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist. It's an odd, basically untreatable chronic rash. However, after I had it a few months, and went gluten-free (after confirmation of another problem) the rash went away almost instantaneously for a few months, then returned. (This made me suspect that the rash was connected to the gluten. Now, I suspect that it is autoimmune in origin and an outgrowth of the original autoimmune condition, although this is apparently disputed by researchers.) Again, I had no knowledge of this condition, and didn't have a "name" associated with it until after having it for 5-6 years.
All this gives me perhaps a unique insight into at least the autoimmune angle of things. Two of the medications in my arsenal are immunomodulators...and they work in precisely the manner you would expect them to. I know when I need to use them, and for how long. (It's actually an off-label use for both of them.) But I still haven't been able to "pop the cork" off my understanding of the truth between germ vs. terrain theory. Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Most of these can be chalked up to either self-devaluation or separation conflicts, but without more specifics, I can't offer much more.
The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull.
I know many people who suffer from migraines. They arise during the epi-crisis of the healing state. If they are chronic, then you can liken the cause to an "allergy" of sorts, where something in your environment triggers the memory of your psyche to an event in your past, directly preceding your migraines. Typically these originally arise as the result of a powerless or frontal fear conflict. The former is self-explanatory but the frontal fear has to do with the fear of something "out ahead of you", "in the future". In short, something triggers your memory and you re-start the dis-ease process each time. Discovering and resolving your original conflict would bring an end to them.
I'm all too familiar with all the terrain theory stories of fumes, molds, household toxins, food toxins, etc. etc. While it's all quite intriguing, it always lacks specificity in the end. Why was only one person in the household effected by the fume/toxins/mold but not everybody? There's no sensible answer to this question. The same goes for alleged boogeymen-viruses. The "why doesn't everybody" question can never be satisfactorily answered in either of these theories.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist.
All skin rashes of the epidermis are the result of a separation conflict. Either due to you not wanting to be separated from someone, or wanting to be separated from someone. When you are feeling the not or wanted separation, your psyche desensitizes your epidermis nerve endings in the regions that you associate with being close to this person. Grover's affects the trunk area, so this is likely related to you missing somebody you hugged often. The psyche does this so that when something or someone touches your trunk skin area, you don't feel it and are not reminded of your separation. When you have resolved the conflict in your mind, the psyche restores the nerve endings in the epidermis and this results in rashes, bumps, pox, etc. If you have recurring bouts and the condition is chronic, this means that you are reminded of this person from time to time.
autoimmune condition
Once again, our modality rejects all notions of these. We obviously acknowledge the symptoms and pain, just not the irrational theory that your body "attacks itself". Skin rashes like psoriasis, dermatitis, hives, measles, rubella, chicken pox, etc. are all a result of the separation conflict. The differences between the diagnosis are a question of intensity, duration and which stage of the dis-ease process you are in, for example, psoriasis is actually the result of two active separation conflicts. Conditions like eczema, shingles and melanoma afflict the deeper skin layer, the dermis, and are a result of an attack or feeling soiled/dirtied/sullied conflict. Your psyche attempts to strengthen your protection from the outside by hardening the deeper layer of the skin.
Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Your gut is correct. Neither are true.
Tissue samples were saved from 1918, and this helped unravel how the disease originated:
Did you read my piece on the Spanish Flu? I agree that pneumonia played a big role, but the question is how and why? It's not "contagious, so something else must have been going on. I explain it all in detail in the linked thread.
It's discussions like this that really help us to dig deeper...
if you're ready to dig deeper, here's your next adventure. It will take you some time to learn, but if you are motivated, you'll pick it up quickly enough. I like to start people on this "Search A-Z" page where you can look up some 500 or so common dis-eases and start to get a sense of things. https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/sbs_index.html#M
Unfortunately, I can't rectify what you describe with my own personal experience, but I don't doubt that it could be relevant with others. Thanks again for sharing a bit of your thoughts!
Thank you for taking the time to explain your thoughts on this. The psychosomatic angle can perhaps explain why people experience similar symptoms as others, aided by fear, but it doesn't explain illness where there is no knowledge of others experiencing symptoms.
A lot of theories look to small-scale outbreaks from hundreds of years ago as explanation, but there don't seem to be any modern equivalents. The case about the sailors on a ship experiencing the same illness as natives on shore (was it Cuba?), when there was no landing party, comes to mind. I think we can say that a lot of illnesses from earlier periods were misdiagnosed, or similar agents attributed to different cases just because they occurred at the same time.
Just last week I watched a video by the red-haired doctor from New Zealand (forget her name at the moment) discussing Lyme disease. As this article did, she exposed how frail the evidence is for a tick-borne illness, but didn't offer an alternative explanation. Why is it, then, that people who are bit by deer ticks, and also get the "bull's eye" rash, get similar symptoms which respond to the same treatment? She also didn't mention that the facility on Plum Island (just across the sound from Lyme, CT) was researching using ticks as a vector for biological agents.
All these diseases attributed to mosquitos and ticks, depend upon the parasites biting a host of a disease first, infecting themselves, then passing along the infection to a second victim. I think it's safe to say that these smaller parasites (insects or arachnidae) very rarely feed twice as would be required. They either feed once successfully and lay eggs, or they fail to find a host in the time required, and die. They are born sterile, so how do "so many" become vectors for a unique disease?
I agree with the conclusions about, for instance, the 1918 Spanish flu was actually bacterial pneumonia/meningitis, and polio is actually a spectrum of neurological symptoms from pesticide exposure, but I've never come across a good, solid discussion of actual disease agents attributed to more common afflictions.
Agreed on this! I'd say most were, right up until this very day I might add. Cooties-1984 as the most obvious exemplar!
Dr. Sam Bailey - wonderful on boogyeman-viruses, but she's lost in "terrain theory" nonsense.
Because she can't offer any explanations as a terrain theory advocate. But I will. Lyme is primarily a self-devaluation conflict. And you'll notice, middle-aged women are most prone to it, as societal "standards" are devastating to their sense of worth. Whenever there's a rash involved, this is always a separate conflict, namely a separation conflict.
Any such tick bite can produce a standard histamine response. This has absolutely nothing to do with "lyme dis-ease" however, which is a made up thing, just like malaria, just like all "auto-immune" disorders as well. It's all lies. There's no such thing as an "immune system", and our bodies are so remarkably intelligent that suggesting they "mutate" or "attack themselves" is literally the height of absurdity. We're awash in an endless amount of lies!
Besides, well over 90% of people who think they have "lyme dis-ease" never report the so-callled "tell tale" tick bite to begin with.
Yep, this is the classic "conspiracy theory" psyop for the truther community. They always run one for the normies and one for the truthers. It's all bunk.
Have you been diagnosed with lyme?
They don't. The entire parasite story is also a lie. Shocker, eh? Parasites form symbiotic relationships with their hosts. There is something "in it" for both of them. The many gut parasites perform a valuable service, removing toxic waste that the person is unable to eliminate due to other conflicts they're suffering.
I used to. Now I understand it fully. There were no "bacterial attacks" as we have been led to believe. This has never been shown to be true. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied. Something else happened. I wrote all about it here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZqU7uaXt/unleashed-special-editionisland-/
I too have heard the story of polio being caused by lead-arsenate and DDT. They may have contributed. I cannot dispute it because no actual proof has been presented. it's a theory. I've also heard the polio jabs themselves contributed to the issues. That too may be possible. We've never seen any definitive proof on either, and probably never will.
There is another explanation though. Motor conflicts are caused by severe self-devaluations. Think MS, ALS, parkinson's, osteoperosis, myalgia, neuropathy and a whole host of others. All eventually lead to paralysis. Could the children of the 1940s and 1950s been so frightened by parents, doctors, teachers, etc. that they began to fear they may have "contracted polio"? Certainly this is possible. And certainly, this did happen. Perhaps not for all cases, but some.
Another great trick of the conventional medical establishment is that they can and often do change the names of their diagnosis to give the appearance that a certain "viral dis-ease" has been eradicated. You don't have to look to far to see how blatantly they did this with almost zero cases of flu registering in 2020 and 2021. They clearly did this with polio too.
Dis-eases like ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease or motor neuron disease), Multiple Sclerosis, or Guillain-Barré syndrome are all clinically indistinguishable from "polio".
Once you learn their tricks, you can start to see through the lies. Good on you for doing your own research, asking questions, and not blindly believing the pseudo-experts. Our doctors have all been profoundly miseducated. They know not what they do or say.
When Q said "those you trust the most....", he wasn't kidding.
Thank you again for your lengthy analysis! You've certainly spent a lot of time thinking this all through.
I've been suffering from a broad-spectrum autoimmune condition for about fifteen years. It was triggered by long-term exposure to formaldehyde fumes coming from a new sofa we purchased. It took years for me to figure it out, mostly because we travel from home so infrequently. But on those occasions when we did, I began to feel better, and then I began learning about toxic environmental fumes in the home, etc. I realized there was an odor coming from the sofa after my body heat warmed it, so I purchased a test kit, which confirmed that the amount of formaldehyde was extremely high.
But even after stripping the sofa to the frame and rebuilding it with safe materials, the damage was done. The worst of the symptoms is a chronic "migraine" (though technically not a migraine) as a result of inflammation inside my skull. I know this because I can feel it, as do others who suffer from this type of specific inflammation. Everyone describes it the same way. It does respond to treatments geared towards migraine.
Having lived with this for a number of years, I can feel what's happening inside me preceding an attack. I can feel the histamines/cytokines going berserk after being exposed to certain triggers. Some of the symptoms mimic lupus, although I test negative for that. As a matter of fact, one of the triggers is being studied here in Florida, and is associated with red tide.
I never expected this condition, never knew about it, and am not a fearful person by nature. After I discovered it, I found out about the class-action lawsuits by airline stewardesses exposed to formaldehyde via their permanent-press uniforms, and the class-action lawsuit against Lumber Liquidators for their laminated flooring, among others.
More recently, I seem to have picked up Grover's Disease, diagnosed by my dermatologist. It's an odd, basically untreatable chronic rash. However, after I had it a few months, and went gluten-free (after confirmation of another problem) the rash went away almost instantaneously for a few months, then returned. (This made me suspect that the rash was connected to the gluten. Now, I suspect that it is autoimmune in origin and an outgrowth of the original autoimmune condition, although this is apparently disputed by researchers.) Again, I had no knowledge of this condition, and didn't have a "name" associated with it until after having it for 5-6 years.
All this gives me perhaps a unique insight into at least the autoimmune angle of things. Two of the medications in my arsenal are immunomodulators...and they work in precisely the manner you would expect them to. I know when I need to use them, and for how long. (It's actually an off-label use for both of them.) But I still haven't been able to "pop the cork" off my understanding of the truth between germ vs. terrain theory. Both sides of both arguments just don't seem to ring true, and I've tried to read and listen to as much as I can that seems credible.
Tissue samples were saved from 1918, and this helped unravel how the disease originated: https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2020/02/06/spanish-flu-of-1918-was-really-a-bioterror-attack-on-humanity
Excellent discussion about polio: https://rodneydodson000.medium.com/what-you-didnt-know-about-polio-26d20cba98e5
Thank you again for your input. I appreciate it! It's discussions like this that really help us to dig deeper...
Most of these can be chalked up to either self-devaluation or separation conflicts, but without more specifics, I can't offer much more.
I know many people who suffer from migraines. They arise during the epi-crisis of the healing state. If they are chronic, then you can liken the cause to an "allergy" of sorts, where something in your environment triggers the memory of your psyche to an event in your past, directly preceding your migraines. Typically these originally arise as the result of a powerless or frontal fear conflict. The former is self-explanatory but the frontal fear has to do with the fear of something "out ahead of you", "in the future". In short, something triggers your memory and you re-start the dis-ease process each time. Discovering and resolving your original conflict would bring an end to them.
I'm all too familiar with all the terrain theory stories of fumes, molds, household toxins, food toxins, etc. etc. While it's all quite intriguing, it always lacks specificity in the end. Why was only one person in the household effected by the fume/toxins/mold but not everybody? There's no sensible answer to this question. The same goes for alleged boogeymen-viruses. The "why doesn't everybody" question can never be satisfactorily answered in either of these theories.
All skin rashes of the epidermis are the result of a separation conflict. Either due to you not wanting to be separated from someone, or wanting to be separated from someone. When you are feeling the not or wanted separation, your psyche desensitizes your epidermis nerve endings in the regions that you associate with being close to this person. Grover's affects the trunk area, so this is likely related to you missing somebody you hugged often. The psyche does this so that when something or someone touches your trunk skin area, you don't feel it and are not reminded of your separation. When you have resolved the conflict in your mind, the psyche restores the nerve endings in the epidermis and this results in rashes, bumps, pox, etc. If you have recurring bouts and the condition is chronic, this means that you are reminded of this person from time to time.
Once again, our modality rejects all notions of these. We obviously acknowledge the symptoms and pain, just not the irrational theory that your body "attacks itself". Skin rashes like psoriasis, dermatitis, hives, measles, rubella, chicken pox, etc. are all a result of the separation conflict. The differences between the diagnosis are a question of intensity, duration and which stage of the dis-ease process you are in, for example, psoriasis is actually the result of two active separation conflicts. Conditions like eczema, shingles and melanoma afflict the deeper skin layer, the dermis, and are a result of an attack or feeling soiled/dirtied/sullied conflict. Your psyche attempts to strengthen your protection from the outside by hardening the deeper layer of the skin.
Your gut is correct. Neither are true.
Did you read my piece on the Spanish Flu? I agree that pneumonia played a big role, but the question is how and why? It's not "contagious, so something else must have been going on. I explain it all in detail in the linked thread.
if you're ready to dig deeper, here's your next adventure. It will take you some time to learn, but if you are motivated, you'll pick it up quickly enough. I like to start people on this "Search A-Z" page where you can look up some 500 or so common dis-eases and start to get a sense of things. https://learninggnm.com/SBS/documents/sbs_index.html#M
Good luck!
Unfortunately, I can't rectify what you describe with my own personal experience, but I don't doubt that it could be relevant with others. Thanks again for sharing a bit of your thoughts!