Now if only somebody could prove "pathogens" are a real thing. They've failed to do demonstrate Koch's Postulates just once in over 150 years now - they're like zero for 70 kajillion.
Yet somehow they can not only create "pathogens" that don't exist in reality, but they can also make them "genome-specific? Impressive considering the world's leading pseudoscientist geneticists can't even agree on what a gene is!!!!!!!
It's all just words on paper. I can file for and be granted endless patents for words on paper. I've got 17 different patents for my custom magic carpets. They're not yet ready for market, but when they are...
This is all just a continuation of the fraudulent fear campaign known as "germ theory".
Easy. The guy who proved the source of ulcers. It's a bacteria. That's an organism. If you put the organism in your body, it makes you sick, with ulcers. That was literally the test he performed. There's your pathogen.
However, I'm with you.. the idea of "hyper specific man made created pathogens" is pure science fiction. Man wants to pretend to be God all the time, but we're not. The likelihood of this "weapon" doing what they want is 0%. They know that though, and you're also right there, they just want money.
Fraudulent fear campaign? I mean.. why do you think your body has an immune system? Just for fun? Germs are obviously real.
Easy. The guy who proved the source of ulcers. It's a bacteria. That's an organism. If you put the organism in your body, it makes you sick, with ulcers. That was literally the test he performed. There's your pathogen.
None of this is true. If it were, he would have proved Koch's Postulates and the pseudoscientists the world over would point to this as their proof. But they don't. Why? Because no such thing happened.
If you're referencing a scientific paper, you need to read the "Methods" section, not the fallacious abstract or conclusion. In it you will see no such thing was accomplished. Further, you won't find any duplicated studies which is a basic requirement of the scientific method.
Bacteria are produced BY YOUR BODY, you don't "catch them". Royal Rife and Gaston Naessans, both persecuted into oblivion for their dark field microscopes saw exactly this. Bacteria are the microsurgeons of the body. They outnumber all other cells combined 10:1. And there's no such thing as "good" vs "bad" bacteria. They all perform a role required by the body.
Ulcers are the result of a hanging anger conflict - effectively the result of people dealing with circumstances they literally "can't stomach". The psyche removes tissue temporarily to help the individual be able to "better stomach" things. It doesn't understand figurative thoughts. The psyche takes them literally.
Good on you for seeing through the psyop!
There's no such thing as an "immune system". The medical mafia made it up in 1972 to be precise, somehow overlooked by the anatomists of the previous 300 years who managed to located all of the body's other "systems". They just hijacked the lymphatic system and made up a bunch of nonsense like "antibodies" and "killer T-cells" out of thin air. The whole thing is a lie and it's easy to see if you're willing to look into it. From Virchow to Jenner to Pasteur to Fauci, and everybody in between. All frauds.
"Germs" as the word generally implies are very much NOT REAL. Boogeyman-viruses don't exist. Bacteria are a temporary form of the microzyma/somatid (the real "God particle") responsible for all of what we call "life". Fungi are also produced by the body to separate and quarantine tissue under repair.
It's a "half-truth" that "bacteria cause dis-ease". They don't in the least, but when created and called upon to repair/remove temporarily altered tissue, it is true that their activity generates putrefaction, the by-product of them eating away temporary tissue, and this does indeed make you "feel sick". But the work they do is vital and necessary as they return the body to a state of homeostasis after going through a conflicting life situation that they psyche has responded to, doing its best to continue one's survival.
Taking anti-biotics (against-lifes), aka "poison", arrests the repair work and leaves your tissue/organ in a forevermore depleted state, weaker than it was prior to your conflict. Just what the doctor ordered, eh? Another lifelong customer to keep the cash registers chugging along.
Man wants to pretend to be God all the time, but we're not.
Truer words have never been spoken. Take your own advice here and now try and imagine how "man" knows what's best for the human body. I can tell you with absolute certainty that western medicine is 95% lies and deceptions. The only value it has is in emergency care, 99% of which wouldn't be needed if "man" understood the truth about health and dis-ease. The bible warns us numerous times about the destructive nature of fear and judgment. These two emotions, if entertained for extended periods of time, are the cause of all dis-ease. Bar none.
Separate what you BELIEVE from what you actually KNOW and you will come to see what I'm saying. Germ THEORY is just that, a THEORY. In actuality it's a totally *REFUTED HYPOTHESIS now, but very few are interested in finding this out for some reason. They'd rather just go on believing the lies, for reasons I don't understand.
None of this is true. If it were, he would have proved Koch's Postulates and the pseudoscientists the world over would point to this as their proof. But they don't. Why? Because no such thing happened.
You keep mentioning "Koch's Postulates" as if it means something or is a modern pertinent example. It is not. Koch himself abandoned them because they were unworkable. It doesn't mean that other theories don't exist and aren't in use.
The main problem with the postulates is simple. You can get an infection without becoming symptomatic. That invalidates one of the claims. It doesn't destroy the idea, it just means his particular four point test was incomplete and unrefined.
If you're referencing a scientific paper, you need to read the "Methods" section
I'm not, I'm referencing a particularly well known example of the type of proof you seek and one that involved self-experimentation by the scientist himself. It's well known for a good reason. I'd take the time to dig into it.
Take your own advice here
You have a seeming tendency to break the world down into a binary of pure black and white that I did not anticipate when starting this conversation. I do not see the world this way, and will argue in those terms. I'm not sure this can be as productive as I had hoped.
New article released today detailing the chronology of the "cholera epidemic" and Robert Koch's continued failures throughout. With a little research and effort, you'll find this pattern of deception to be the case for ALL "pathogenic germs" we have been bamboozled on.
The "heros" of modern medicine were anything but. All those venerated today were, quite simply, pathological liars.
The "h-pylori bacteria", which is merely a temporary form, is no different. It takes from and becomes active when a tissue restoration process in the gut is underway. The loss of tissue prior to this due to an anger conflict in which the psyche is attempting to widen the stomach to help someone better "stomach a situation" they're angry about. When the conflict is resolved, the bacteria restore the temporarily necrotized tissue. Most "stomach ulcers" are the result of a back-and-forth, in-and-out, anger conflict that gets resolved, then reactivates over and over again. It is quite true, however, that when the bacteria are activated, this is when the pain occurs. This is the "true" part of the "half-truth" surrounding the fallacious claim that "bacteria cause dis-ease".
The people at the highest echelons of establishment medicine have promulgated virtually nothing but lies and deceptions to keep the masses weak, sick, beholden to "the experts" and most of all scared of the world around them.
Now if only somebody could prove "pathogens" are a real thing. They've failed to do demonstrate Koch's Postulates just once in over 150 years now - they're like zero for 70 kajillion.
Yet somehow they can not only create "pathogens" that don't exist in reality, but they can also make them "genome-specific? Impressive considering the world's leading pseudoscientist geneticists can't even agree on what a gene is!!!!!!!
It's all just words on paper. I can file for and be granted endless patents for words on paper. I've got 17 different patents for my custom magic carpets. They're not yet ready for market, but when they are...
This is all just a continuation of the fraudulent fear campaign known as "germ theory".
Easy. The guy who proved the source of ulcers. It's a bacteria. That's an organism. If you put the organism in your body, it makes you sick, with ulcers. That was literally the test he performed. There's your pathogen.
However, I'm with you.. the idea of "hyper specific man made created pathogens" is pure science fiction. Man wants to pretend to be God all the time, but we're not. The likelihood of this "weapon" doing what they want is 0%. They know that though, and you're also right there, they just want money.
Fraudulent fear campaign? I mean.. why do you think your body has an immune system? Just for fun? Germs are obviously real.
None of this is true. If it were, he would have proved Koch's Postulates and the pseudoscientists the world over would point to this as their proof. But they don't. Why? Because no such thing happened.
If you're referencing a scientific paper, you need to read the "Methods" section, not the fallacious abstract or conclusion. In it you will see no such thing was accomplished. Further, you won't find any duplicated studies which is a basic requirement of the scientific method.
Bacteria are produced BY YOUR BODY, you don't "catch them". Royal Rife and Gaston Naessans, both persecuted into oblivion for their dark field microscopes saw exactly this. Bacteria are the microsurgeons of the body. They outnumber all other cells combined 10:1. And there's no such thing as "good" vs "bad" bacteria. They all perform a role required by the body.
Ulcers are the result of a hanging anger conflict - effectively the result of people dealing with circumstances they literally "can't stomach". The psyche removes tissue temporarily to help the individual be able to "better stomach" things. It doesn't understand figurative thoughts. The psyche takes them literally.
Good on you for seeing through the psyop!
There's no such thing as an "immune system". The medical mafia made it up in 1972 to be precise, somehow overlooked by the anatomists of the previous 300 years who managed to located all of the body's other "systems". They just hijacked the lymphatic system and made up a bunch of nonsense like "antibodies" and "killer T-cells" out of thin air. The whole thing is a lie and it's easy to see if you're willing to look into it. From Virchow to Jenner to Pasteur to Fauci, and everybody in between. All frauds.
"Germs" as the word generally implies are very much NOT REAL. Boogeyman-viruses don't exist. Bacteria are a temporary form of the microzyma/somatid (the real "God particle") responsible for all of what we call "life". Fungi are also produced by the body to separate and quarantine tissue under repair.
It's a "half-truth" that "bacteria cause dis-ease". They don't in the least, but when created and called upon to repair/remove temporarily altered tissue, it is true that their activity generates putrefaction, the by-product of them eating away temporary tissue, and this does indeed make you "feel sick". But the work they do is vital and necessary as they return the body to a state of homeostasis after going through a conflicting life situation that they psyche has responded to, doing its best to continue one's survival.
Taking anti-biotics (against-lifes), aka "poison", arrests the repair work and leaves your tissue/organ in a forevermore depleted state, weaker than it was prior to your conflict. Just what the doctor ordered, eh? Another lifelong customer to keep the cash registers chugging along.
Truer words have never been spoken. Take your own advice here and now try and imagine how "man" knows what's best for the human body. I can tell you with absolute certainty that western medicine is 95% lies and deceptions. The only value it has is in emergency care, 99% of which wouldn't be needed if "man" understood the truth about health and dis-ease. The bible warns us numerous times about the destructive nature of fear and judgment. These two emotions, if entertained for extended periods of time, are the cause of all dis-ease. Bar none.
Separate what you BELIEVE from what you actually KNOW and you will come to see what I'm saying. Germ THEORY is just that, a THEORY. In actuality it's a totally *REFUTED HYPOTHESIS now, but very few are interested in finding this out for some reason. They'd rather just go on believing the lies, for reasons I don't understand.
You keep mentioning "Koch's Postulates" as if it means something or is a modern pertinent example. It is not. Koch himself abandoned them because they were unworkable. It doesn't mean that other theories don't exist and aren't in use.
The main problem with the postulates is simple. You can get an infection without becoming symptomatic. That invalidates one of the claims. It doesn't destroy the idea, it just means his particular four point test was incomplete and unrefined.
I'm not, I'm referencing a particularly well known example of the type of proof you seek and one that involved self-experimentation by the scientist himself. It's well known for a good reason. I'd take the time to dig into it.
You have a seeming tendency to break the world down into a binary of pure black and white that I did not anticipate when starting this conversation. I do not see the world this way, and will argue in those terms. I'm not sure this can be as productive as I had hoped.
Anyways.. best of luck to you.
New article released today detailing the chronology of the "cholera epidemic" and Robert Koch's continued failures throughout. With a little research and effort, you'll find this pattern of deception to be the case for ALL "pathogenic germs" we have been bamboozled on.
The "heros" of modern medicine were anything but. All those venerated today were, quite simply, pathological liars.
The "h-pylori bacteria", which is merely a temporary form, is no different. It takes from and becomes active when a tissue restoration process in the gut is underway. The loss of tissue prior to this due to an anger conflict in which the psyche is attempting to widen the stomach to help someone better "stomach a situation" they're angry about. When the conflict is resolved, the bacteria restore the temporarily necrotized tissue. Most "stomach ulcers" are the result of a back-and-forth, in-and-out, anger conflict that gets resolved, then reactivates over and over again. It is quite true, however, that when the bacteria are activated, this is when the pain occurs. This is the "true" part of the "half-truth" surrounding the fallacious claim that "bacteria cause dis-ease".
Here's the article for your perusal: https://mikestone.substack.com/p/kochs-cholera-catastrophe
The people at the highest echelons of establishment medicine have promulgated virtually nothing but lies and deceptions to keep the masses weak, sick, beholden to "the experts" and most of all scared of the world around them.