INTRODUCTION
California Governor G Newsom wants to fine a school board for NOT using corrupted text materials that praise pedo predator Harvey Mil.
Question: How can a governor or other government body issue a fine against someone or something for simply breaking their rules?
For violating 'law'. "Legal violation". Once you understand that much of statute law aka 'civil' law, aka maritime law (contract law) is actually in violation of common law aka the law of the land, you begin to see the true evil mechanisms of the system of systems.
ONE
Common Law vs Contract Law
Common law is innate, God given. However, contract law requires agreement, consent.
Under common law, a crime can only exist when someone has suffered loss or damage. If no one suffers loss or damage, there is no crime.
Under contract law, however, a 'crime' or violation simply exists when one or more parties contravene the requirements or rules of the contract.
The 'legal' system has been infiltrated over decades and centuries, so that governments can 'legally' lay down rules that they then attempt to force citizens aka people to comply with. They can only do so via contract law, aka statute law.
How can they do this? It starts with requiring everyone to 'register' their children at birth. When you are registered, that registration creates a 'legal' entity in your name. Your birth certificate becomes the registration of the living you in the corporate - legal - civil system. It is on that basis that they exert control over you. By registering, and accepting that registration as 'you', you are seen as having given consent to be treated as a legal entity.
Why? Because a corporation itself is a purely 'legal' entity. It is essentially dead. It is not living. It only exists on paper, legally, and a non-living entity like a corporation cannot contract with a living entity.
But you are not your legal identity. You are a living man or woman. Burn your birth certificate, and you are still alive. You exist, and your rights as a living man or woman exist with you. But in order to exert control (corruptly, unlawfully), the governments establish 'statute law', aka rules that they then require you to comply with, and then they use force against your legal entity to make you do it if you do not comply. Taxation. Rules and regulations. Etc.
TWO
Contract Law Must be Subservient to Common Law
Statute law is meant to be subject to Common Law. Why? Because common law, the law of the land, is based on and reflects God's law, aka innate natural law.
Common law was developed and manifested via courts - places where living men and women could challenge each other for damages or loss, and where the results are judged by juries of their peers - other living men and women.
However, courts today mostly operate in the hidden and secret world of the 'legal system', where language is specialized, where lawyers and jurists (judges, etc) are an elite class, and where statute law rules the day.
Statute law - the law that legislatures draft and pass - is law enacted by governments (not courts) to lay down laws for corporate entities and interactions between legal entities. No statute law should violate common law. In other words, no statute law should violate the innate rights of living men and women.
The Founding Fathers understood this, and created the Constitution on the basis of common law existing up to that date, in order to curb and control government. The constitution is all about what the government CANNOT do, and what it can do within a prescribed limit. The Founders of the United States recognized that government had to be limited, because innate law, and innate rights, and living men and women, are correctly superior to government. Government should ONLY exist by the consent of the governed.
But corruption always seeks to infiltrate. It infiltrates through the cracks. It infiltrates in the dark, in secret, gradually increasing its own power and control. So, over time, the system of birth registrations arose, the system of the 'legal' world, and the systems of governments that allow them to dictate to living men and women what they must and must not do, via treating them as purely legal entities, not as living beings.
It's via this method that they reverse the correct order of justice and the order of creation, wherein the creator can never come below the created.
THREE
The Natural Order
The natural order is this: God > living man, living woman > government > corporation (non-living entities).
God creates living men and women, who then create governments as instruments for serving certain requirements of the living men and women, and governments then create corporate entities via 'legal' means.
The corrupting powers reverse this: corporations > government > living men and woman > (x) God
They put corporations on top (NGOs like WEF are corporations), which then exert control over governments, which then exert control over living men and women, in an effort to exert control over God and push God out of the equation altogether.
Today, much of the core influence of the Cabal is now exerted via 'money'. They use fiat 'money' aka 'corporate' money, instead of real money (gold, silver, etc, natural substances). This is another reason why "Gold Destroys FED".
In the modern era, governments are supposed to be created by living men and women to set rules for the interactions (aka 'contracts') between non-living entities like corporations, businesses, etc. Originally, the United States government was created with that vision.
But our living rights come from God, not from a government. They are innate, and since the 1200's in England, laws were developed on the premise that they MUST reflect God's law, aka innate natural law. This is common law, law that manifests via courts as venues for interactions between living men and women.
FOUR
Control Via Legal Means
Much of statute law is now created by governments not based on common law aka innate law, but based on maritime law aka contractual law.
So if you 'speed' in your car, they can fine you even is no one is even hurt. If you smoke this substance, they can fine or imprison you. Violate their rules, and they hunt you down.
All victimless crimes are only crimes because governments (the state) say they are crimes, and living people don't know that the difference.
Part of this entire system runs and functions because at birth, governments 'require' people to 'register' their children whereupon the child is replicated as a legal entity, and it’s this 'legal entity' that is targeted and controlled via statute law our entire lives.
But whether a living man or woman is registered with a government or not, they still exist, they are still alive, and as such they still have inviolable innate rights.
This is the REAL crux of the Great Awakening. The legal system of government is the core mechanism of enslavement. Where government is meant to serve, it is corrupted and used to control and enslage. The ideal vision of this evil is government (the State) controlling living people, enslaved using 'legal' means. The ultimate utopia of this evil system is the NWO, the ultra-government, controlled by the wealthy who exert their control via dead corporations.
The Covid19 "Pandemic" was where they showed themselves to be exactly who the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying they are for years.
FIVE
Legal Does Not Equal Lawful
There is a massive difference between 'legal' and 'lawful'.
Lawful originally means reflecting innate natural law (common law, law that comes from God). Legal means statute law, civil law, law created by governments and non-living entities, which essentially require consent between the parties to that.
Slavery was once legal, but it was never, and never can be, lawful. Slavery violates the innate truth, that all people are created by God with equal value, each one as God's son or daughter.
It's also important to understand that the United States constitution is essentially a codification of all the common law that had been established up until that date. That's where the Bill of Rights comes from. Common Law. Moreover, it was common law that was the basis for the entire premise of the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
SIX
Understanding Lawful vs Legal is KEY to What Follows The Great Awakening
The War being waged today is both a spiritual war and a material law, and a war between Lawful vs Legal
Which will stand in the superior position, the 'legal' or the 'lawful?
We need the legal. It is necessary to coordinate and serve the people by defining interactions between non-living entities. We need the lawful, because law is the basis of a peaceful, harmonious, just society.
But what is lawful must ALWAYS stand in the upper position over what is legal. Just as living men and women must stand in their rightful position OVER government.
It is the REVERSAL of these positions and the correct order and dynamic that is evil. Why? Because the correct order is the one ordained by the Creator and infused into the fabric of the universe.
Today, evil is attempting to institute a dead, governing control system where all living people are slaves via legal means. This is done by corporate entities (and their money) controlling governments to create statute laws that essentially enslave the people and make them subservient to government.
This is the Swamp that DJT has sworn to obliterate.
The Great Awakening is about the masses of living men and women waking up to the mechanisms by which this evil has been deceiving, manipulating and controlling them over decades, over centuries. But that is the starting point.
SEVEN
What Comes After
The transition is one of moving from being governed by Evil to being self-governing under God (aka innate natural law).
For this, awakening is required. The foundation for the transition was planted with the victory of Christ 2000 years ago, and it has been fermenting, growing ever since. It has evolved centrally in the sphere of Christian civilization through the emergence of common law. In the last few centuries, it has spread to exert a positive influence on all cultures and civilizations worldwide. It's no coincidence that Evil has worked to corrupt that influence.
It's all about the innate rights of living men and women VS. 'privileges' endowed by dead corporate governments on legal entities via legal means. The people of the world are now being called (by God, imo) to wake up to how Evil has controlled the world since time immemorial, via what mechanisms, via what corruptions evil has assailed us with.
The people of the world are being called to wake up to our correct and rightful position as free living men and women under God, with governments under us, not the other way around, and the United States has been the chosen spearhead of this call.
When DJT stated he was transferring the power from Washington DC back the American People, he was in essence stating that he was acting to restore the correct and natural order between dead corporate government and living men and women.
But this is also why the Awakening MUST happen. Living Men and Women can ONLY exert their true authority over the dead corporate entities and contractually run governments WHEN those living men and women understand their true rights and obligations to be responsible and self-governing.
In the absence of living men and women who aware of their rights and the correct role and position of the legally structured non-living world, evil will always fill the vacuum and the servant will attempt to usurp the master's correct position.
So it was in Eden, so it was 2000 years ago, and so it is now.
FURTHER STUDY, INVESTIGATION
Legal vs Lawful
The Magna Carta
Adamic Law vs Angelic Law
Frederic Bastiat - "The Law" (essay)
Christian Foundations of Common Law
'Reversal of natural order' as the foundation and beginning of evil
I think things become more clear when it is put into historical context.
It all comes from England, and they got parts of it from Rome, and other parts they created.
The common law is of the common people. Statutory law, also known as civil law, is of the king.
Civil law started in Rome. The emperors and/or Senate would write a law and that was the law. Everyone was supposed to obey it.
Most of the world still works under a civil law system. The government employees pass a law, and that is that. The people are supposedly only allowed to do what the law says they can do.
England was different.
England developed the common law. Under common law, the people have natural rights, so they can do whatever they want, as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others.
England did not strictly develop this principle. Philosophers did, and the American founders enshrined these ideas in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.
But England developed the overall basic working structure. Some of the common law ideas even England borrowed from other cultures in Europe before them.
In England, there was a time before William the Conqueror (it wasn't officially England back then), when the people largely resolved their own legal issues and the common people came up with a system of law that more or less worked out for the best.
But as the king gained more power, the king did not like the people deciding everything. So, the king (don't remember off hand which one), studied old Roman law, and decided he like it. So, he started creating civil law within England, which already had the common law of the people.
So, when the people had a dispute with each other, they settled it with common law. They had their own trials, their own judges, and their own juries.
But when the king's money and powers were involved, the king enforced civil law and his own statutes and courts.
Want to enter into a contract with your neighbor? Fine. But any dispute arising from that will be settled in a common law court. The king was not interested in such petty disputes of the surfs and peasants.
However, if you decided you did not want to participate in the annual king's tax, well that was a different story. That was under the civil law system, and the king would enforce it in his own court -- with the obvious result being that the king would win any dispute.
Over time, this sytem developed such that different parts of the kingdom were following different common law ideas.
So, King Edward II decided to unify the common law system by sending judges around the kingdom to find out what everyone was doing. The result was a more unified common law system.
Out of that, we get such principles as a right to jury trial, due process, no search and seizure except under judicial order, etc.
When England's colonies in America won independence, the American system mostly adopted the English legal system, which they already had in place -- modified by American ideas.
So, England and all former English colonies utilize the common law system, while the rest of the world is under the civil law system.
The problem is that the common law system is "common law" in name only. Over the centuries, and especially ramping up in the 20th century, the civil law ideas of "top-down edicts from the government" have crept into the American common law system.
Law schools today bascially teach that the common law does not really exist anymore and it is more of a civil law system. Yet, we still have common law and its principles. Most "licensed attorneys" (it is unlawful to require a license to engage in the profession of law, per the Supreme Court, but every State does it anyway) have no idea how the common law really works.
The concept of admiralty law came in as there was more and more activity at sea, with bigger and more powerful ships (with larger crews).
At sea, the captain is the law, subject only to maritime (admiralty) law.
But they have tricked the People into an admiralty/civil law system in what SHOULD be common law courts.
Unraveling it all from there is a very deep topic.
I will just make 2 points here:
(1) Understanding this dual nature of a government (and its employees) who want to impose a civil law system within a common law structure is very important to understand, as I believe it is the key to unlocking the corruption within the legal industry. Keep one thing uppermost in mind: The US Constitution is a common law document, written for a people who understood the common law and its principles, adopted from England.
(2) By keeping all this in mind, you might be able to free yourself from some of the oppression that government employees would want to impose upon you. For example, I got a speeding ticket dismissed by challenging subject matter jurisdiction. I think what happened was that the "judge" (not a real judge in the true, common law sense) had no real idea what I was talking about, but did not want to look stupid (which she clearly was). While she huffed and puffed and was overbearing and outright rude in the extreme towards me, the case was ultimately dismissed because supposedly the "prosecution did not have anyone available to move forward with the case." Yeah, right! AS IF! This was TRAFFIC COURT. The ONLY job of that particular employee from the prosecutor's office was to handle these types of cases all day long. In reality, they were unsure of my constitutional grounds that I was raising, and decided to punt rather than cause themselves a potential legal problem. So, there can be power in understanding this stuff, BUT ...
Beware of claims around admiralty law and such, because when I have seen anyone try that in a real court room, they lose and lose BIG.
You have to meet the judges and attorneys (as corrupt as they and their system are) at a place where they can understand that a REAL legal issue they THEY recognize is possibly in play, and it might be a hot potato they don't want to touch.
There is a lot of debate about where the Common Law came from, and there are a lot of atheists (AHEM) who want to argue that it did not originate in the Law of Moses. However, it is quite clear from historical evidence and countless examples that the Common Law WAS the Law of Moses.
The question is -- why did it match? We do not have a record of someone saying "This is the Common Law". It just seemed to sprout into existence even before historical records were written.
The answer many English people have arrived at is the following.
Of course, such a conclusion completely blows away any narrative that evolutionists and atheists would like to have, that human reason can overcome passion and you can create peaceful, strong societies without God. Of course they are wrong.
That is an interesting take on history.
Central Europe was inhabited by the germanic people for many centuries. Like you said, the Angles and Saxons went into Britain and bacame the Anglo-Saxons of England.
Other germanic people went into the swamps of Holland and become the Dutch, who had a very libertarian society (the Pilgrims went there before coming to America, and got many of their liberty ideas there).
Where did the germanic people come from?
Dustin Nemos has done a lot of research and concluded that the original Chosen People are actually the White Europeans (germanic), not the jews.
The historical flow would fit with what you wrote. If they came out of Israel and settled in central Europe, then it would make sense that they would continue to follow The Law from biblical times to more modern times.
These people would also settle Britain and be the ones who created the English common law, and ultimately founded the USA.
https://theserapeum.com/what-is-the-serapeum/
BTW, yudsfbpc ...
Your connection of biblical law and English common law got me thinking, and looking for some info.
Found something interesting.
This article, "Where Do the German Peoples Come From?" is EXACTLY on point with what I was saying about how the biblical Israelites were White and ended up in Central Europe (and later, Britain, and developed the English common law -- largely from biblical principles).
Interesting that mainstream historians have no answer as to where these Germanic people came from, considering they were the primary population of Europe.
https://medium.com/secrets-of-german-history/where-do-the-german-peoples-come-from-cf9e3254b885
Here is a (long) video with 100 reasons to consider that God's Chosen People were the White race, and not the jews.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_pBwpOoLo0
This idea is new to me. But the more I look into it, the more the history seems to line up -- at least, from a biblical perspective.
Be careful with this research. They want to tag anyone who believes that Europeans are Israel as anti-semitism.
If you look at the Biblical prophecies about Israel's future, God promised that we would forget him and forget our ancestors, and that we'd be universally hated and despised by all the rest of the world. It certainly fits what has been happening with European history. No one ever liked the Europeans, and no matter where we went, we had to win wars and battles just to say hi more often than not. I think it's funny when people pretend the Europeans had some distinct advantage over, say, the African, Asians or Americans. Any advantage we had was because of countless years of being pushed against and beat upon. Take, for instance, the spice trade that passed through the Ottoman empire. We were at their mercy for such a long period of time in our history!
RE America's Founding. We followed the blueprint written by John Locke and demonstrated by Cromwell. The US Constitution, and all state constitutions, are based on English Common Law. English Common Law is STILL in effect in all states of the union and all territories governed by the US.
Many people want us to forget this law and what it means and how it is used, and those people UNIVERSALLY are the same that want to take away our sacred rights.
But really, Common Law doesn't govern us. It is the law we write, the law based on the law God writes in our hearts, the law God gave Moses and gave to all of Israel. It cannot be written down or contained in a book, and is subject to change as we see fit.
God --> People --> Common Law --> Constitutional Law --> Government is how the order of operations works.
The truth is YOU need to evaluate what YOU think is right, and then act accordingly. That is all. If you act righteously and with full faith and confidence in the Lord, you will be in the write, even when judges and juries say otherwise, and the people will eventually turn to follow your righteous law rather than the corrupt one!
The key principle is this -- unjust laws are not laws at all, and never will be! And justice cannot be limited by language!
That is all true, but it would still be helpful to have strategies to deal with unjust people in unjust situations.
Pew pew
That is our Anglo-Saxon tradition
When the norman conquerors punished the nearest town when a norman noble was murdered, the Anglo-Saxons would dress their victims in Anglo-Saxon clothing.
A lot of normans disappeared after their so-called victory.
Eventually the normans had to adopt the Anglo-Saxon traditions and laws.
Many of the kings of England after the conquest complained that they'd rather live in France and govern their lands there than the brutish Anglo-Saxons, who were ungovernable and opposed the king in everything he did.
In Rome, they would actually carve the law on a stone that everyone could see. Having a physical representation of the law opened up curious ideas, like, what would happen if someone defaced the stone, or knocked it over, or broke it?
Really, in the case of Rome, the law was a truce between warring households. Each house could raise their army and wage war. So when they were talking about law, they were talking about the agreement between each other, and nothing more, and if the agreement wasn't working for one or more parties, they could just raise an army and have a civil war.
This only applied to the patricians, however. Everyone else in Roman society couldn't afford to do such things.
That is interesting, considering that the vast majority of people could not read until the printing press was invented, more than 1,000 years later.
Lies
Reading was common
They Romans even taught their slaves to read, as most slaves had jobs that involved reading and writing.