INTRODUCTION
California Governor G Newsom wants to fine a school board for NOT using corrupted text materials that praise pedo predator Harvey Mil.
Question: How can a governor or other government body issue a fine against someone or something for simply breaking their rules?
For violating 'law'. "Legal violation". Once you understand that much of statute law aka 'civil' law, aka maritime law (contract law) is actually in violation of common law aka the law of the land, you begin to see the true evil mechanisms of the system of systems.
ONE
Common Law vs Contract Law
Common law is innate, God given. However, contract law requires agreement, consent.
Under common law, a crime can only exist when someone has suffered loss or damage. If no one suffers loss or damage, there is no crime.
Under contract law, however, a 'crime' or violation simply exists when one or more parties contravene the requirements or rules of the contract.
The 'legal' system has been infiltrated over decades and centuries, so that governments can 'legally' lay down rules that they then attempt to force citizens aka people to comply with. They can only do so via contract law, aka statute law.
How can they do this? It starts with requiring everyone to 'register' their children at birth. When you are registered, that registration creates a 'legal' entity in your name. Your birth certificate becomes the registration of the living you in the corporate - legal - civil system. It is on that basis that they exert control over you. By registering, and accepting that registration as 'you', you are seen as having given consent to be treated as a legal entity.
Why? Because a corporation itself is a purely 'legal' entity. It is essentially dead. It is not living. It only exists on paper, legally, and a non-living entity like a corporation cannot contract with a living entity.
But you are not your legal identity. You are a living man or woman. Burn your birth certificate, and you are still alive. You exist, and your rights as a living man or woman exist with you. But in order to exert control (corruptly, unlawfully), the governments establish 'statute law', aka rules that they then require you to comply with, and then they use force against your legal entity to make you do it if you do not comply. Taxation. Rules and regulations. Etc.
TWO
Contract Law Must be Subservient to Common Law
Statute law is meant to be subject to Common Law. Why? Because common law, the law of the land, is based on and reflects God's law, aka innate natural law.
Common law was developed and manifested via courts - places where living men and women could challenge each other for damages or loss, and where the results are judged by juries of their peers - other living men and women.
However, courts today mostly operate in the hidden and secret world of the 'legal system', where language is specialized, where lawyers and jurists (judges, etc) are an elite class, and where statute law rules the day.
Statute law - the law that legislatures draft and pass - is law enacted by governments (not courts) to lay down laws for corporate entities and interactions between legal entities. No statute law should violate common law. In other words, no statute law should violate the innate rights of living men and women.
The Founding Fathers understood this, and created the Constitution on the basis of common law existing up to that date, in order to curb and control government. The constitution is all about what the government CANNOT do, and what it can do within a prescribed limit. The Founders of the United States recognized that government had to be limited, because innate law, and innate rights, and living men and women, are correctly superior to government. Government should ONLY exist by the consent of the governed.
But corruption always seeks to infiltrate. It infiltrates through the cracks. It infiltrates in the dark, in secret, gradually increasing its own power and control. So, over time, the system of birth registrations arose, the system of the 'legal' world, and the systems of governments that allow them to dictate to living men and women what they must and must not do, via treating them as purely legal entities, not as living beings.
It's via this method that they reverse the correct order of justice and the order of creation, wherein the creator can never come below the created.
THREE
The Natural Order
The natural order is this: God > living man, living woman > government > corporation (non-living entities).
God creates living men and women, who then create governments as instruments for serving certain requirements of the living men and women, and governments then create corporate entities via 'legal' means.
The corrupting powers reverse this: corporations > government > living men and woman > (x) God
They put corporations on top (NGOs like WEF are corporations), which then exert control over governments, which then exert control over living men and women, in an effort to exert control over God and push God out of the equation altogether.
Today, much of the core influence of the Cabal is now exerted via 'money'. They use fiat 'money' aka 'corporate' money, instead of real money (gold, silver, etc, natural substances). This is another reason why "Gold Destroys FED".
In the modern era, governments are supposed to be created by living men and women to set rules for the interactions (aka 'contracts') between non-living entities like corporations, businesses, etc. Originally, the United States government was created with that vision.
But our living rights come from God, not from a government. They are innate, and since the 1200's in England, laws were developed on the premise that they MUST reflect God's law, aka innate natural law. This is common law, law that manifests via courts as venues for interactions between living men and women.
FOUR
Control Via Legal Means
Much of statute law is now created by governments not based on common law aka innate law, but based on maritime law aka contractual law.
So if you 'speed' in your car, they can fine you even is no one is even hurt. If you smoke this substance, they can fine or imprison you. Violate their rules, and they hunt you down.
All victimless crimes are only crimes because governments (the state) say they are crimes, and living people don't know that the difference.
Part of this entire system runs and functions because at birth, governments 'require' people to 'register' their children whereupon the child is replicated as a legal entity, and it’s this 'legal entity' that is targeted and controlled via statute law our entire lives.
But whether a living man or woman is registered with a government or not, they still exist, they are still alive, and as such they still have inviolable innate rights.
This is the REAL crux of the Great Awakening. The legal system of government is the core mechanism of enslavement. Where government is meant to serve, it is corrupted and used to control and enslage. The ideal vision of this evil is government (the State) controlling living people, enslaved using 'legal' means. The ultimate utopia of this evil system is the NWO, the ultra-government, controlled by the wealthy who exert their control via dead corporations.
The Covid19 "Pandemic" was where they showed themselves to be exactly who the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying they are for years.
FIVE
Legal Does Not Equal Lawful
There is a massive difference between 'legal' and 'lawful'.
Lawful originally means reflecting innate natural law (common law, law that comes from God). Legal means statute law, civil law, law created by governments and non-living entities, which essentially require consent between the parties to that.
Slavery was once legal, but it was never, and never can be, lawful. Slavery violates the innate truth, that all people are created by God with equal value, each one as God's son or daughter.
It's also important to understand that the United States constitution is essentially a codification of all the common law that had been established up until that date. That's where the Bill of Rights comes from. Common Law. Moreover, it was common law that was the basis for the entire premise of the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
SIX
Understanding Lawful vs Legal is KEY to What Follows The Great Awakening
The War being waged today is both a spiritual war and a material law, and a war between Lawful vs Legal
Which will stand in the superior position, the 'legal' or the 'lawful?
We need the legal. It is necessary to coordinate and serve the people by defining interactions between non-living entities. We need the lawful, because law is the basis of a peaceful, harmonious, just society.
But what is lawful must ALWAYS stand in the upper position over what is legal. Just as living men and women must stand in their rightful position OVER government.
It is the REVERSAL of these positions and the correct order and dynamic that is evil. Why? Because the correct order is the one ordained by the Creator and infused into the fabric of the universe.
Today, evil is attempting to institute a dead, governing control system where all living people are slaves via legal means. This is done by corporate entities (and their money) controlling governments to create statute laws that essentially enslave the people and make them subservient to government.
This is the Swamp that DJT has sworn to obliterate.
The Great Awakening is about the masses of living men and women waking up to the mechanisms by which this evil has been deceiving, manipulating and controlling them over decades, over centuries. But that is the starting point.
SEVEN
What Comes After
The transition is one of moving from being governed by Evil to being self-governing under God (aka innate natural law).
For this, awakening is required. The foundation for the transition was planted with the victory of Christ 2000 years ago, and it has been fermenting, growing ever since. It has evolved centrally in the sphere of Christian civilization through the emergence of common law. In the last few centuries, it has spread to exert a positive influence on all cultures and civilizations worldwide. It's no coincidence that Evil has worked to corrupt that influence.
It's all about the innate rights of living men and women VS. 'privileges' endowed by dead corporate governments on legal entities via legal means. The people of the world are now being called (by God, imo) to wake up to how Evil has controlled the world since time immemorial, via what mechanisms, via what corruptions evil has assailed us with.
The people of the world are being called to wake up to our correct and rightful position as free living men and women under God, with governments under us, not the other way around, and the United States has been the chosen spearhead of this call.
When DJT stated he was transferring the power from Washington DC back the American People, he was in essence stating that he was acting to restore the correct and natural order between dead corporate government and living men and women.
But this is also why the Awakening MUST happen. Living Men and Women can ONLY exert their true authority over the dead corporate entities and contractually run governments WHEN those living men and women understand their true rights and obligations to be responsible and self-governing.
In the absence of living men and women who aware of their rights and the correct role and position of the legally structured non-living world, evil will always fill the vacuum and the servant will attempt to usurp the master's correct position.
So it was in Eden, so it was 2000 years ago, and so it is now.
FURTHER STUDY, INVESTIGATION
Legal vs Lawful
The Magna Carta
Adamic Law vs Angelic Law
Frederic Bastiat - "The Law" (essay)
Christian Foundations of Common Law
'Reversal of natural order' as the foundation and beginning of evil
Same story as the virus, huh?
Wilfull ignorance, all around us.
Indeed, you've stated it most correctly and succinctly.
As I'm starting to theorize lately, I think there are certain deep BELIEFS that significantly contribute to an individual's essential identity. As such, a threat to these beliefs is a threat to the core of one's existence.
I haven't heard a better explanation for this willful ignorance anyway. Sure, "herd mentality" has a little bit to do with it for some. But the people who fight to defend their factless beliefs? What other rational explanation could there be?
This is my latest theorizing anyway. Perhaps there's a better explanation. I just haven't heard one yet....
What do you think?
I think you are correct. It is essentially a spiritual problem. Belief directly affects spiritual growth and development. Spiritual growth and development impact on one's ability to process difficulty and pain. The issue is age-old, and the solutions are still in the process of emerging to popular consciousness.
Yes. BELIEFS stand in the way of the perception, and therefore experience of truth. Ironically, it isn't a matter of "growth", although this is how we humans perceive matters. It's actually a process of "shedding" that quite simply returns us to our natural state of awareness. Dropping the baggage is all that's necessary. As the saying goes, "the truth shall set you free". Thus, "beliefs" are not truths. They're not falsehoods either. They're neither. Now if only more could see this simple reasoning....
Yes, in reverse once again. The unwillingness to "process" difficult life situations is the cause of all dis-ease, decay and ultimately death. We have been indoctrinated into "holding onto it". Men get the stoic/macho indoctrination. Women get the "bury emotions" indoctrination. When we don't "process" the e-motion (energy in motion), the energy gets stored in the body, where it doesn't belong.
Indeed, however said solutions have been around since time immemorial. Ancient yoga (asanas/stretching) and meditation (silent sitting) were designed for just this purpose; to allow the processing of, and therefore liberation from the stuck energies.
But of course, like all other truths, these things have been twisted and distorted beyond recognition. Today, yoga is seen as a method for "looking/feeling good" and meditation, especially "guided meditation" is just something "trendy to do". Almost all popular renditions of both miss the mark completely today.
The problem comes down to BELIEFS as always. Most of my family are mainstream Christians. Because there's no apparent guidance in the bible for either of these tools, they generally think it's just a bunch of Indian hocus pocus nonsense. And there ain't no winning 'em over any time soon it appears. While I count the Christians as far ahead of the leftists/materialists/atheists on most matters, they're still mightily ensnared in the popular dogma which has enough stealthily crafted deception, mixed with truths, to leave them in a continued state of ignorance on many topics. The example I give here is the worst of it -> "If it ain't in the bible, matching the popular interpretation of the words and what most people agree the words mean, then I'm going to ignore it.".... sigh...
C'est la vie. We've all got our lessons to learn. We wouldn't be here otherwise!
I have a different perspective to you. In my view, belief is a necessary and integral part of our processes. We believe that the sun will rise tomorrow, and we take actions accordingly.
I agree that beliefs can become barriers, but I don't see that as integral part of what belief is or how it functions.
I would say that beliefs need to be informed by perception, despite their capacity to form barriers, beliefs also have an innate capacity to both reflect and enhance correct perception.
Fundamental to this view is a recognition that all energy for existence, action and multiplication derives directly from a reciprocal process of giving and receiving engagement between complementary partners: Mind and body, male and female, etc.
In this framework, the universe is essentially a relational organism, and all things within the universe (cosmos) function according to relational principals.
Belief originally develops by engaging with perception of truth. Limited perception of truth naturally leads to limited or immature belief. But belief is key to generating the power of faith (belief in action). Faith is an emotional, mental and volitional engagement with what is perceived as 'truth'. It's that engagement with truth that drives the heart and the spirit forward, and as perception of truth is increasingly experienced, it becomes integrated into action, and we begin to manifest or experience the truth, not simply perceive it.
From this view, the relationship between faith (belief) and truth is originally reciprocal, and perception of truth should develop by application of engaging with, and questioning, one's beliefs.
The power of faith is very important. It provides the running wheels, the guardrails that keep us on track during the process of growth. In principle, growth always passes through a 3 stage process, moving from origin or genesis (the seed) to completion (aka 'perfection') via a formational stage, a growth or expansion stage and then a maturation or completion stage.
While spiritual growth is multifaceted, ultimately, the core of spiritual development is the growth of the heart, and the ability to give and receive love. The unlimited ability to give love manifests as unconditional love, where the heart is able to give and give regardless of what is returned in the feedback loop from the object of love. This is the perfection of heart, where one's heart achieves full and complete resonance with the original heart of the Creator.
Thus, in this framework, belief (or faith) and truth form a reciprocal relationship that develops and evolves in the direction of perfected faith and perfected experience of truth, realized through perfection of heart. Belief is the manifestation of truth within the subjective nature of our spirit (mind) during this growing process. once completion or perfection is attained, belief is transformed into direct knowledge aka direct experience.
Where you see things "Yes, in reverse once again", I wonder if you might consider that perhaps you see it this way because you are primarily focused on one aspect of the dynamic interaction, rather than the duality or reciprocal nature of the dynamic.
I mean, certainly, unwillingness to engage with or process (life) difficulties can have a direct relationship to disease and dysfunction, but that unwillingness to engage also impedes spiritual growth (aka spiritual development, development and maturation of emotion, intellect, will and heart). Moreover, immaturity in such internal development also directly impedes one's capacity to engage with such difficulties in a successful manner that resolves them.
I think we can learn a lot about human nature by observing the natural processes of growth and development from birth, through childhood, adolescence to adulthood. Certain, the physical development here is instructive, as it is essentially automatic, although obviously internal development or retardation can impact on that.
The spirit or mind/heart also grows to maturity, but its progress is inherently contingent of choices made along the way, including what to believe, what to hold as truth, etc. Thus, our choices can directly halt or even distort that growth. Because the growth of the spirit / mind is directly impacted by personal choices, the Creator's process of raising humanity's awareness and spiritual development has necessarily been a long and difficult process.
Immaturity of the mind (spirit) is directly related to the issue of childhood trauma. When faced with trauma, many of a child's essential emotional, mental and even spiritual functions will shut down because the pain is too intense and cannot be processed successfully, when cognitive abilities are immature and thus limited.
A child sees mommy and daddy fighting, perceives that somehow they are involved, and may draw the conclusion that they themselves are the cause. Such an idea is extremely painful, and the child will consciously and unconsciously develop strategies to counter that pain and cope with it.
In trauma, the mind goes in to survival mode, shutting down certain functions in order to preserve its operational potential. The more trauma is engaged, the more severe the shutdown, and in extreme cases, alternative personalities and alternate 'realities' can be created in order to compartmentalize the suffering.
Bingo, MK Ultra.
Now, consider someone like Jesus (whether you believe Jesus is real or not). A person fully mature in the heart and the spirit can undergo extreme levels of internal and external suffering, but ultimately trauma might not be induced because their capacity to process that is highly developed. The suffering is overcome because the internal capacity to process the suffering and pain is sufficiently mature.
There are many reasons why people avoid internal pain. Where belief is originally a capacity that unlocks our potential and enhances our abilities, it can also work in reverse to shut us down. To my mind, the problem here is not belief itself, but whether intention and capacity is present to be willing to examine belief and work on refining it so that it unlocks rather than shuts down.
It's difficult because the reciprocal nature of the dynamic means it can go in reverse and become a catch 22. Ignorance begets limitations in development, and limitations in development begets continued ignorance.
Here, the influence of outside factors needs to be taken into account, because under natural (aka original) conditions, the reciprocal dynamic will more in a positive, constructive direction. The process of gradual development of time (history) has been directly intertwined with a gradual removal of outside influences that undermine the natural or original processes.
In Christian terms, God has worked to decrease the influence of Satan over people so that people can increasingly engage with more original forms of the dynamic between development of belief and perception of truth.
We could state this is very different terms, but I like the Christian framework here because of the simplicity or rather, the reduction to basic concepts.
Being able to find fluidity in conceptualizations of truth outside narrow terminological and conceptual frameworks really requires development in the area of experiencing truth as opposed to merely conceptualizing it. That';s because truth (or reality) itself is transcendent to the multitude of frameworks that people usually employ to engage with it.
I like this discussion, and I empathize with you re: "Most of my family are mainstream Christians."
What's important to realize, imo, is that different angles and perspectives cognize different things and also cognize the same things differently.
There is a massive kaleidoscope of expressions and perceptions of truth out there, and bringing them into a unified whole is something that we, as a race (human race) are still learning to do. Sadly, but understandably, differences in perspectives are often perceived as being in conflict. Without a transcendent framework for all truth, it is extremely difficult to filter out what aspects of our chosen framework are correct or incorrect. (If we knew that, we'd jettison the incorrect aspects and adhere only to the correct ones).
Caveat: I think it is useful to develop a definition of what is 'correct' and what isn't in terms of understanding of truth. In a relative framework, where multitudes of people experience and perceive the truth in unique, relative ways, I prefer to think of perceptions or conceptualizations of truth as being either "more resonant" or "less resonant" with ultimate truth. Certain views or conceptualizations will be more accurate, and others less accurate, but usually none are completely devoid of SOME resonance.
The difficulty in overcoming perceived contradictions between different views of "what truth is" lies in the challenge of cognizing transcendent perspectives that can reconcile the apparent contradictions, by clarifying inaccuracies or less resonant conceptualizations and articulating the complementary nature of the more resonant conceptualizations.
Christianity is particularly challenging, because Christians have been subject to thousands of years of theological concepts that become ingrained, as you say, which tend to act as a barrier to more evolved conceptualizations that can integrate a larger or more expansive set of ideas.
Ever read Ayn Rand?
I didn't care so much for the novels. I liked the non-fiction.
One of the points I remember most was her explanation of what emotions are.
You might have a slight negative emotion, but you don't know who or under what circumstances, so your emotion would not be strong.
You might even have a smile on your face, amazed at such a long life.
Your emotion would be much darker.
You would be crushed.
You would probably laugh hysterically.
In all these cases, you received an external stimulus: I told you that someone died.
But your emotions were different, depending on the details. Why?
It's because our emotions are our body's mechanism for giving us physical feedback about any stimulus, either external or internal, as this stimulus relates to our values.
The stimulus can be external if you see, hear, smell, taste, or touch something in the physical world. Or, it can be internal if you have a thought about something.
Either way, your body reacts with emotions based on your values.
If you hear RFK, Jr. talking about vaccine harm, you probably have a positive emotion because you value people speaking out about this subject.
But the libtard wearing 2 masks riding a bicycle is horrified at the exact same stimulus (RFK, Jr.). That's because the libtard's values are different.
And our values are different based on our experiences in life.
We obtain our values and beliefs from the culture we live in, modified by our own experiences (including learning about things).
This is what makes us have different emotions to the exact same stimulus.
If you can figure out not just what the other person thinks, but WHY they think it, you can get to their values and beliefs.
THEN, you can address those beliefs and MAYBE have a shot and getting them to see the error of their ways.
Ayn Rand said decades ago that the only way to get rid of communism is through a cultural revolution.
Cultural revolution is certainly how the commies have got as far as they have.
But two can play at that game.
Q team needs to take over the media. That will be the ultimate checkmate.
Short of that, we encourage each other and try to get the sheep to question their own beliefs.
Watch some of Jan Helfield's old interviews of politicians. He does exactly this, and they wrap themselves into knots trying to avoid all their intellectual hypocracy. It's hilarious!
A bit. All of her novels, a bit of her philosophy. I've got a good buddy that's an expert on all things Ayn. He regularly talks about her work so I'm quite familiar with it in this sense. I lean more toward esoteric spirituality for my "philosophy" however.
Agreed with all your points. However, I'm evaluating things from, dare I say, a "higher level" than this Randian position. Not a "better level", just one beyond "ordinary levels" so to speak.
I do recognize that this realm is built on BELIEFS, not facts. There's tons of analysis out there around this idea of "predictive programming". Simpsons, 9/11, TV & movies galore, as far back as the book "Futility" (1898), later titled "The Wreck of the Titan", and even further back, to say the "black plague".
I don't agree that this is "predictive". A better word for it in my mind would be "productive" programming. When enough individual minds collectively BELIEVE something, it materializes.
Another thought is, the more we BELIEVE something is true, the more we draw information to ourselves to support our belief, and repel information that contradicts it.
In the case of boogeyman-viruses, a single experience of "I caught Covid off my wife" or "I got chicken pox from my classmate" or "somebody else always gets sick when someone in the household is sick" forms such an impenetrable BELIEF in someone, that no amount of facts can tear it down. I've learned this the hard way dozens of times over. C'est la vie.
Anyway, I've just been formulating a new theory. It might be wrong, not sure. But I appreciate you chiming in with some of your ideas. Helps me reframe and reformulate a few thoughts for sure!
Two quotes from 150+ years ago have always stuck with me:
"When a slave sees a freeman, he can think one of two thoughts: (1) There is a freeman, why is he not a slave like me?; or (2) There is a freeman, why am I not free like he is?" -- Frederick Douglass
"I could have freed more slaves, if only I could have convinced them that they were slaves." -- Harriet Tubman
The human mind is a powerful thing. Many people believe something, probably formed during childhood, and have a difficult time accepting any new information that contradicts their beliefs. Cognative dissonance.
This makes it all the more difficult to bring up legal challenges in a court case. Even the judge and opposing attorney (hell, even your own attorney if you use one for advice) often times cannot accept that there is a logical fallacy or contradiction in their thinking, even when it is clearly laid out for them.
Forget about the layman. Most of them have been so programmed, as you say, that they can't fathom any ideas that counter their programming.
And I agree that the term "predictive programming" is incorrect. It does not predict the future. Rather, it propgandizes to such a degree that the thinking is shaped in that direction.