INTRODUCTION
California Governor G Newsom wants to fine a school board for NOT using corrupted text materials that praise pedo predator Harvey Mil.
Question: How can a governor or other government body issue a fine against someone or something for simply breaking their rules?
For violating 'law'. "Legal violation". Once you understand that much of statute law aka 'civil' law, aka maritime law (contract law) is actually in violation of common law aka the law of the land, you begin to see the true evil mechanisms of the system of systems.
ONE
Common Law vs Contract Law
Common law is innate, God given. However, contract law requires agreement, consent.
Under common law, a crime can only exist when someone has suffered loss or damage. If no one suffers loss or damage, there is no crime.
Under contract law, however, a 'crime' or violation simply exists when one or more parties contravene the requirements or rules of the contract.
The 'legal' system has been infiltrated over decades and centuries, so that governments can 'legally' lay down rules that they then attempt to force citizens aka people to comply with. They can only do so via contract law, aka statute law.
How can they do this? It starts with requiring everyone to 'register' their children at birth. When you are registered, that registration creates a 'legal' entity in your name. Your birth certificate becomes the registration of the living you in the corporate - legal - civil system. It is on that basis that they exert control over you. By registering, and accepting that registration as 'you', you are seen as having given consent to be treated as a legal entity.
Why? Because a corporation itself is a purely 'legal' entity. It is essentially dead. It is not living. It only exists on paper, legally, and a non-living entity like a corporation cannot contract with a living entity.
But you are not your legal identity. You are a living man or woman. Burn your birth certificate, and you are still alive. You exist, and your rights as a living man or woman exist with you. But in order to exert control (corruptly, unlawfully), the governments establish 'statute law', aka rules that they then require you to comply with, and then they use force against your legal entity to make you do it if you do not comply. Taxation. Rules and regulations. Etc.
TWO
Contract Law Must be Subservient to Common Law
Statute law is meant to be subject to Common Law. Why? Because common law, the law of the land, is based on and reflects God's law, aka innate natural law.
Common law was developed and manifested via courts - places where living men and women could challenge each other for damages or loss, and where the results are judged by juries of their peers - other living men and women.
However, courts today mostly operate in the hidden and secret world of the 'legal system', where language is specialized, where lawyers and jurists (judges, etc) are an elite class, and where statute law rules the day.
Statute law - the law that legislatures draft and pass - is law enacted by governments (not courts) to lay down laws for corporate entities and interactions between legal entities. No statute law should violate common law. In other words, no statute law should violate the innate rights of living men and women.
The Founding Fathers understood this, and created the Constitution on the basis of common law existing up to that date, in order to curb and control government. The constitution is all about what the government CANNOT do, and what it can do within a prescribed limit. The Founders of the United States recognized that government had to be limited, because innate law, and innate rights, and living men and women, are correctly superior to government. Government should ONLY exist by the consent of the governed.
But corruption always seeks to infiltrate. It infiltrates through the cracks. It infiltrates in the dark, in secret, gradually increasing its own power and control. So, over time, the system of birth registrations arose, the system of the 'legal' world, and the systems of governments that allow them to dictate to living men and women what they must and must not do, via treating them as purely legal entities, not as living beings.
It's via this method that they reverse the correct order of justice and the order of creation, wherein the creator can never come below the created.
THREE
The Natural Order
The natural order is this: God > living man, living woman > government > corporation (non-living entities).
God creates living men and women, who then create governments as instruments for serving certain requirements of the living men and women, and governments then create corporate entities via 'legal' means.
The corrupting powers reverse this: corporations > government > living men and woman > (x) God
They put corporations on top (NGOs like WEF are corporations), which then exert control over governments, which then exert control over living men and women, in an effort to exert control over God and push God out of the equation altogether.
Today, much of the core influence of the Cabal is now exerted via 'money'. They use fiat 'money' aka 'corporate' money, instead of real money (gold, silver, etc, natural substances). This is another reason why "Gold Destroys FED".
In the modern era, governments are supposed to be created by living men and women to set rules for the interactions (aka 'contracts') between non-living entities like corporations, businesses, etc. Originally, the United States government was created with that vision.
But our living rights come from God, not from a government. They are innate, and since the 1200's in England, laws were developed on the premise that they MUST reflect God's law, aka innate natural law. This is common law, law that manifests via courts as venues for interactions between living men and women.
FOUR
Control Via Legal Means
Much of statute law is now created by governments not based on common law aka innate law, but based on maritime law aka contractual law.
So if you 'speed' in your car, they can fine you even is no one is even hurt. If you smoke this substance, they can fine or imprison you. Violate their rules, and they hunt you down.
All victimless crimes are only crimes because governments (the state) say they are crimes, and living people don't know that the difference.
Part of this entire system runs and functions because at birth, governments 'require' people to 'register' their children whereupon the child is replicated as a legal entity, and it’s this 'legal entity' that is targeted and controlled via statute law our entire lives.
But whether a living man or woman is registered with a government or not, they still exist, they are still alive, and as such they still have inviolable innate rights.
This is the REAL crux of the Great Awakening. The legal system of government is the core mechanism of enslavement. Where government is meant to serve, it is corrupted and used to control and enslage. The ideal vision of this evil is government (the State) controlling living people, enslaved using 'legal' means. The ultimate utopia of this evil system is the NWO, the ultra-government, controlled by the wealthy who exert their control via dead corporations.
The Covid19 "Pandemic" was where they showed themselves to be exactly who the "conspiracy theorists" have been saying they are for years.
FIVE
Legal Does Not Equal Lawful
There is a massive difference between 'legal' and 'lawful'.
Lawful originally means reflecting innate natural law (common law, law that comes from God). Legal means statute law, civil law, law created by governments and non-living entities, which essentially require consent between the parties to that.
Slavery was once legal, but it was never, and never can be, lawful. Slavery violates the innate truth, that all people are created by God with equal value, each one as God's son or daughter.
It's also important to understand that the United States constitution is essentially a codification of all the common law that had been established up until that date. That's where the Bill of Rights comes from. Common Law. Moreover, it was common law that was the basis for the entire premise of the American Revolution and the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident..."
SIX
Understanding Lawful vs Legal is KEY to What Follows The Great Awakening
The War being waged today is both a spiritual war and a material law, and a war between Lawful vs Legal
Which will stand in the superior position, the 'legal' or the 'lawful?
We need the legal. It is necessary to coordinate and serve the people by defining interactions between non-living entities. We need the lawful, because law is the basis of a peaceful, harmonious, just society.
But what is lawful must ALWAYS stand in the upper position over what is legal. Just as living men and women must stand in their rightful position OVER government.
It is the REVERSAL of these positions and the correct order and dynamic that is evil. Why? Because the correct order is the one ordained by the Creator and infused into the fabric of the universe.
Today, evil is attempting to institute a dead, governing control system where all living people are slaves via legal means. This is done by corporate entities (and their money) controlling governments to create statute laws that essentially enslave the people and make them subservient to government.
This is the Swamp that DJT has sworn to obliterate.
The Great Awakening is about the masses of living men and women waking up to the mechanisms by which this evil has been deceiving, manipulating and controlling them over decades, over centuries. But that is the starting point.
SEVEN
What Comes After
The transition is one of moving from being governed by Evil to being self-governing under God (aka innate natural law).
For this, awakening is required. The foundation for the transition was planted with the victory of Christ 2000 years ago, and it has been fermenting, growing ever since. It has evolved centrally in the sphere of Christian civilization through the emergence of common law. In the last few centuries, it has spread to exert a positive influence on all cultures and civilizations worldwide. It's no coincidence that Evil has worked to corrupt that influence.
It's all about the innate rights of living men and women VS. 'privileges' endowed by dead corporate governments on legal entities via legal means. The people of the world are now being called (by God, imo) to wake up to how Evil has controlled the world since time immemorial, via what mechanisms, via what corruptions evil has assailed us with.
The people of the world are being called to wake up to our correct and rightful position as free living men and women under God, with governments under us, not the other way around, and the United States has been the chosen spearhead of this call.
When DJT stated he was transferring the power from Washington DC back the American People, he was in essence stating that he was acting to restore the correct and natural order between dead corporate government and living men and women.
But this is also why the Awakening MUST happen. Living Men and Women can ONLY exert their true authority over the dead corporate entities and contractually run governments WHEN those living men and women understand their true rights and obligations to be responsible and self-governing.
In the absence of living men and women who aware of their rights and the correct role and position of the legally structured non-living world, evil will always fill the vacuum and the servant will attempt to usurp the master's correct position.
So it was in Eden, so it was 2000 years ago, and so it is now.
FURTHER STUDY, INVESTIGATION
Legal vs Lawful
The Magna Carta
Adamic Law vs Angelic Law
Frederic Bastiat - "The Law" (essay)
Christian Foundations of Common Law
'Reversal of natural order' as the foundation and beginning of evil
Several years ago, when I knew very little about this stuff (a little, but not much), I got a traffic ticket.
I asked the judge, "Is this a civil case or criminal case?" He said, "Criminal."
Now what?
No contract needed in a criminal case, so your strategy is dead in the water at that point (which is exactly where my mind was at -- CRIMINAL? WTF do I do NOW?)
KEK
Based on what I know NOW, I would have never asked that question, not even on a Special Appearance.
Instead, I would file an Affidavit with the Court Clerk to be placed in the case file, and a Petition to Dismiss the case based on lack of Subject Matter Jursidiction. Of course, I would send a copy to the "prosecutor" or whatever info I had (in my recent traffic ticket, the case file had only one piece of paper, which was a printout, and really had almost no info to go on, in terms of who my opponent was).
As a final step to the filing of that paperwork, I would ask the Court Clerk to put me in touch with someone who could schedule a hearing on my petition. Traffic court might not have that ability in their system, but regular courts do. I would at least try, and make note of it if they refused.
Any paperwork filed with the Court Clerk, where a judge will have to make a decision (a Motion, or Petition, etc.) MUST also be scheduled for a hearing on that issue.
THIS is one of the big mistakes pro pers make. They think either (a) they can just verbally say what they want in court (which is what I did in my recent traffic ticket -- not the right way to do it, but sometimes works out), or (b) they file paperwork with the Court Clerk, but do not follow up to schedule a hearing (and give notice to the other side). THIS is the right way to do it -- file, schedule a hearing, and give notice to the other side. Without that hearing scheduled, the judge can just sit on it and do nothing. Then, the pro per will complain that the judge didn't do what he was required to do. Oh, yes he did because he was not required to look at anything if there is not a hearing for him to look at it (and take some sort of action).
The SMJ challenge would be based on failure to provide notice to me (the defendant) as to the Nature and Cause of the action (i.e. not telling me if it is civil or criminal, federal or state, so that I would properly defend myself). 6th Amendment requires that an accused must be informed of the nature and cause of the action against him.
Maybe, I would add your idea of showing up and specifically stating I was there on Special Appearance, not General Appearance, and I would testify (before the judge realized what I was doing) that my Affidavit was my testimony and was true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Robert Fox explains this concept.
At that point, I have written documentation that there is NO CASE against me, as a MATTER OF LAW.
If the judge decides to railroad me anyway, I have several options:
I agree that MOST people will not do this. But everyone must start somewhere.
Baby steps could one day lead to winning the gold medal at the Olympics.
BTW ...
Robert Fox has the answer to that, as well:
If you are ever put into a position of being required to do a psych eval by a judge because the judge is trying to intimidate you due to you not doing what he wants, you go to the psychiatrist and say this:
"I have a 5th Amendment right to remain silent and not be a witness against myself. I stand on my rights, and I have nothing further to say. Goodbye."
You then walk out (back to your prison cell, if necessary). They have nothing to provide regarding psyche eval. If the judge wants to put you in jail because you refused to be a witness against yourself, you not only have him by the balls when you file your Writ of Habeus Corpus with a different court house, but you have a massive lawsuit against him and the city/county for a black letter law violation of the most egregious kind.
He also said if you think a judge might do that, get your own psyche eval first, and then give it to the judge when he threatens you, and say, "Your honor, I have already taken the liberty to have a psyche eval done. Here is a copy. But I do not have a copy of a psyche eval from you or from the prosecuting attorney. Because the law requires equal protection of the law, I will need to see one from each of you, as well."
Takes balls. Yeah.
Agreed.
Not so. This is actually the answer you want! A criminal case requires an injured party and your right to question said party. Your only question to the cop is, "what injury did you sustain"? No injury, no case. Simple.
Your example of the loud music and pissed off neighbor is entirely different situation in which neither your, nor my strategy would work as there is an injured party. You must offer compensation for the affront. This is "natural law" in effect.
As to the ensuing paragraphs, I've agreed this is a superior strategy if you know what you're doing and wish to prove your point "lawfully". But that's a lot of trouble to go to for say a $150 traffic ticket. A lot of "on-the-fly" learning, a lot of paperwork, a lot of follow-up, etc. etc. It's a lot simpler to just show up in court, use my strategy, and if you can't win the joust with the judge, just pay the ticket and be done with it. I think this is where most people are at. They really don't care in the grand scheme. Now, if it's a $1500 or $15,000 fine, that's a whole different matter. I'd never suggest my strategy in these situations. The SMJ strategy is the only way to go now.
Caveat emptor. This is a risky strategy. ALL STRATEGIES are risky once you find yourself in this situation. First and foremost, the psychopathic psychiatrist can just straight up lie a thousand different ways about his interaction with you. He could suggest your uncooperative nature is a sign of a psychiatric disorder alone. Or he could just flat our say you failed his test. Who's going to contradict him? It's not like you get to have your attorney present, if you even have one, or have the encounter recorded. They can pretty much do and say anything they want. And before you know it, you're being force-fed mind-altering psychiatric drugs. Not a good place to be.
Now, I'm not saying this is a good or bad strategy per se. I'm saying you could very well be in big trouble, especially if you've humiliated the judge. He and his cronies can pretty much do whatever they want....and often do just that.
I brought up this point about pscyhe-evals simply to highlight the need to "remain in honor" at all times, and to not humiliate the judge. Once you get one issues against you, it's usually very bad news for you. They can instruct guards to beat you, move you from facility to facility without directly notifying your family/attorney, etc. and all sorts of nasty things can happen along the way. Net-Net - remain in honor and never try to humiliate the judge.
Would Fox's strategy work? Maybe. I wouldn't bet the farm on it though.
As to his second strategy I react the same. Maybe. However, it's not fool-proof. The judge/court may only be interested in their "guy's" opinion. The judge can rule this way. Or the judge can say well that was 3, 6, 9 months/years ago and is no longer relevant today. Lots of ways this can be twisted against you.
Once again, I don't think there IS a good strategy other than remaining in honor at all times to avoid such a situation in the first place.
You've reached a level where you can "legally joust" with them, in honor. If I had a nickel for every time I've seen somebody who also seemingly possessed this knowledge, but got rattled and fell out of honor, I'd at least have $100 or so...lol.
Remaining in honor is rule #1, #2, #3, #4 & #5 in my estimation. Even while the judge and prosecutor are acting dishonorably. It's not a level playing field in the last. But joining them in their dishonor, or even worse, pointing their's out, can bring disastrous results!
You make some good points.
In a corrupt system, which is made corrupt by dishonest and corrupt people, all bets are off.
Happens on rare occasions... ;)