UFO Hearing was 2hr 22min and 20sec Long and Ended at 12:22:20. Q Drop 2222
(media.greatawakening.win)
🐸 WAG THE E.T. 👽
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
Relativity would argue with you with regards to space time. And Quantum has been vaguely understood since the 1940’s.
Quantum Entanglement and Superposition are hardly “magical”, merely embodying evidence that the realm we live in; doesn’t have physical laws or logic that apply to either subatomic nor astronomical scales.
Einstein was the man who coined the phrase “spooky interactions at a distance”, to explain quantum entanglement and also defines Relativistic physics. Hardly magical at all. Life couldn’t exist without it
The theory of relativity only assumes there is a physical continuum of time. No facts to support it. Just because you can graph (e.g.) kinematics as a function of time does not mean that time is a physical dimension. I happen to be trained in science and engineering, so I am not impressed by people jumping to nonsensical conclusions. I am familiar with relativity. And I am also familiar with the fact that the correspondence principle (of frame acceleration vs. gravity), which is the foundation of general relativity, is a false presumption.
Actual quantum physics is not magical, BUT assuming there are things lurking there with magical potential is indeed magical thinking. All physical laws smoothly transition from one scale to another...or they are poorly posed. Einstein was famously dubious about quantum physics altogether. The only person I have known to unify physics from the quantum to the relativistic level was Frederick Kantor, in his "information mechanics." Not a crank. He was a respected X-ray astronomer.
And yet the accuracy of GPS was moved from +/- 100+ ft to less than 20 ft by accounting for time dilation. Strange
SpaceX and NASA all maintain 3 clocks for flight. Local, launch time and capsule time. It’s measured since the days of Apollo.
You may wanna update your science background. It’s outdated. Look into String theory- no deep dives needed. A short YouTube by the BBC called Dr Quantum and the Double Slit Experiment is very fascinating.
Your assumptions are decades out of date
Nothing I said is out of date, and referring to the GPS corrections means nothing to this argument, since I did not reject special relativity as a predictive theory. My "science background" came with 3 degrees in astronautics, including such things as fusion physics, orbital mechanics, fluid physics, and laser physics (truly quantum technology). Where are your credentials that you can imagine I am out of date?
String theory is a grand head trip, but increasingly seen as irrelevant because it cannot be experimentally investigated. As I am literate, I have little use (or patience) for YouTube expositions. You might profit to read the work of Halton Arp, regarding the major assumptions of modern cosmology, or the work of Frederick Kantor regarding the unification of quantum and relativistic physics. For many years, I took the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics, which was nothing but exploration of alternative physical hypotheses. Before you attempt to clear the speck from my eye, go and remove the plank from yours. Put your attitude where your mouth is and look into more modern approaches.