I read that this change was at the request of FOX 5 news as they claimed copyright infringement. At any rate, I will reserve judgement until I hear or read a statement from him directly. Until then, it's fake news in my opinion.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life. Click the link it has all the information.
A tv station put a copyright strike on it because he didn't have permission to use their footage.
He could argue fair use but it would be down while he fought it. Doesn't seem like caving to me.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
Exactly what others have said, some of the footage used was copyrighted to Fox and a couple of others, who never sold them permission to use it, that's why it got edited out.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
I read that this change was at the request of FOX 5 news as they claimed copyright infringement. At any rate, I will reserve judgement until I hear or read a statement from him directly. Until then, it's fake news in my opinion.
true. it's all a smear game to stop its popularity
I could see Fox doing that.
72 hour rule is extended due to friday release of news blurb, am with you on this.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life. Click the link it has all the information.
losing alot of comment karma due to repeating the same comment to people. maybe link where you got that info?
as an aside, thinking of restarting an account named justlosingcommentkarmahere.
A tv station put a copyright strike on it because he didn't have permission to use their footage. He could argue fair use but it would be down while he fought it. Doesn't seem like caving to me.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
This is a serious clickbait post OP! Shame!
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
This is BS! Jason "did not" cave.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
Exactly what others have said, some of the footage used was copyrighted to Fox and a couple of others, who never sold them permission to use it, that's why it got edited out.
Mark Dice explains it in a recent video.
According to the Post, the video's conclusion has undergone more alterations. The final 30 seconds of the previous version had footage of a man in a baseball cap and an older man talking about small-town life.
They removed 6 seconds of video due to copyright issue, please use discernment next time.
Clickbait.
This isn't FB or Youtube, do better.
My thoughts exactly!! Seems to be a lot of this on the board lately.
False - was a copyright issue.
Reminder - they want you divided.
I don't have a problem with him changing it.
It's not like he drank bud light....