Posted today, frog. Thanks!!!

That's the talking point the democrats from the committee put out after Archer's testimony, and the media all dutifully parrots it like good little propagandists.

no..

HE PROVIDED ACCESS

Here in Canada, we had around the clock reporting on Trump and Russia collusion - today NO reporting as I can see here in the major MSM outlets regarding Archer testimony - even the so called right. Exception was Globe and Mail which spun it as a "stalemate" - neither side making a case. Just so crazy - whatever the plan is, obviously something will force the media as this is waking up no one., I am just sitting here patient as always.

Well spotted. The MSM are trying to run cover for Joe (He knew nothing about it ... honest emoji). They are throwing Hunter under the bus - i.e., that he was really the ONLY bad boy. OK, so they admit that Hunter did it. The laptop from hell was not a Russian disinfo project, after all. (remember that?). SEND OUT the NEXT TALKING POINT - it's an illusion crafted by Hunter himself.

The problem with the illusion theory, is that oligarchs and their associated corporations, have a highly tuned nose for being sold a mickey. Without the assurance of Joe's influence or input, they would not have gladly handed over millions for an 'illusion'. I also don't think that a bumbling, whoring crack-head could have carried off such a complex illusion. Was that off-putting demeanor a deviously contrived front for what was really a scheming con-artist, selling his father's power, while the father was blissfully unaware? Any Billionnaire would run a mile in the other direction without some insurance.

I don't think so, somehow.

Also, it seems like a riddle why Hunter is receiving exorbitant sums for his artworks. Once one understands the influence peddling, this becomes a similar, but more refined mechanism, whereby the 'art' transaction merely lends legitimacy via a 'sale'.

See? There is paperwork, and a REAL painting to prove it.

So, in effect, the corruption is still happening.

Really, OP's observation is confirmation of how MSM, and their handlers, view their audience - as mushrooms, i.e. fed Sh*t and kept in the dark.