And among the internal threats would be an impending civil war, or breakdown of order. I don't know why you would exclude it. Q did not exclude "impending." I'm not so impressed with the threat of frozen bank accounts and food shortages. We already went through some of that with Covid, and the public went along with it like sheep. Many of them literally chose to die rather than buck the system (failed to do due diligence about the "vaccine"---to coin a phrase, "Injections have consequences").
As for nukes, I would be surprised if we could intercept one (if it was fired at us). I would be more concerned at the threat of us firing at Russia. Literally, picking a fight with a bear, leading to nuke shots we couldn't intercept. (I worked in strategic defense for 20 years and what we have today is like a towel in a San Francisco bathhouse: near-nakedness.)
Simple reason - it would not be a controllable threat and the precipice is all about complete control. In an impending threat of a civil war, all it it takes is for one person in one nameless city to brutalize someone and share the video, and then even all the WHs wont be able to stop what happens next.
Additionally, all that hatredness between brethern right before the Great Awakening would not be conducive to Great Awakening.
So I firmly standby my prediction that there will be no impending civil war. I know some people relish at the idea of one, even an impending one. Not me. I grew up amongst constant communal riots, and I wouldn't wish on my enemies.
Aha. You think the essence of a precipice is that it is in control? Wrong. It's the other way around: the fear that you are not in control. The fear can't be fake. You think a nuclear exchange would be in control? Whose?
I think it would take more than a single viral outrageous video to push anyone into civil war. There was lots of that in the mass riots of a few years ago, and not even close to a civil war. No, the whole point of impending is that all are conscious of heading toward a fork in the road. Between what and what is unknown and the Q Team would have to put their fork in public view in time for them to pick it.
You think the essence of a precipice is that it is in control? Wrong
The difference between Precipice ("scare event") and the real Abyss where humanity will be enslaved is that one is a controlled event ("Patriots are now in control") vs uncontrolled.
For the normie, it feels as real as anything. But the precipice itself is completely under control, just like everything has been since this devolution started.
As fo rthe fork in the road? You are correct. But its being placed in front of everyone through out the past few years. You were a doctor? A fork was presented to you to jab the unsuspecting masses. You are a politician? A fork was presented to do the right thing many times. Judges? Cops? Tech executive? You name it. Forks all over the place, and by the time we hit the precipice everyone would be forced to pick a side.
Well, you seem to think that being on the brink of nuclear war is "in control," so I won't waste more time on alleging the opposite. Just ponder what you are thinking. Just remember that all forms of control cease at the margins of control. (I worked in weapon systems.) Airplanes go out of control too often, but total control is an impossibility. Nothing is more precarious of "control" than human affairs. If you keep things away from the real "brink," then maybe you can pull it off. How "real" is that brink, then?
And, by the way, as for forks in the road---the evidence so far is that the majority will pick the wrong side. How does that get us safe from the precipice?
And among the internal threats would be an impending civil war, or breakdown of order. I don't know why you would exclude it. Q did not exclude "impending." I'm not so impressed with the threat of frozen bank accounts and food shortages. We already went through some of that with Covid, and the public went along with it like sheep. Many of them literally chose to die rather than buck the system (failed to do due diligence about the "vaccine"---to coin a phrase, "Injections have consequences").
As for nukes, I would be surprised if we could intercept one (if it was fired at us). I would be more concerned at the threat of us firing at Russia. Literally, picking a fight with a bear, leading to nuke shots we couldn't intercept. (I worked in strategic defense for 20 years and what we have today is like a towel in a San Francisco bathhouse: near-nakedness.)
Simple reason - it would not be a controllable threat and the precipice is all about complete control. In an impending threat of a civil war, all it it takes is for one person in one nameless city to brutalize someone and share the video, and then even all the WHs wont be able to stop what happens next.
Additionally, all that hatredness between brethern right before the Great Awakening would not be conducive to Great Awakening.
So I firmly standby my prediction that there will be no impending civil war. I know some people relish at the idea of one, even an impending one. Not me. I grew up amongst constant communal riots, and I wouldn't wish on my enemies.
Aha. You think the essence of a precipice is that it is in control? Wrong. It's the other way around: the fear that you are not in control. The fear can't be fake. You think a nuclear exchange would be in control? Whose?
I think it would take more than a single viral outrageous video to push anyone into civil war. There was lots of that in the mass riots of a few years ago, and not even close to a civil war. No, the whole point of impending is that all are conscious of heading toward a fork in the road. Between what and what is unknown and the Q Team would have to put their fork in public view in time for them to pick it.
The difference between Precipice ("scare event") and the real Abyss where humanity will be enslaved is that one is a controlled event ("Patriots are now in control") vs uncontrolled.
For the normie, it feels as real as anything. But the precipice itself is completely under control, just like everything has been since this devolution started.
As fo rthe fork in the road? You are correct. But its being placed in front of everyone through out the past few years. You were a doctor? A fork was presented to you to jab the unsuspecting masses. You are a politician? A fork was presented to do the right thing many times. Judges? Cops? Tech executive? You name it. Forks all over the place, and by the time we hit the precipice everyone would be forced to pick a side.
Well, you seem to think that being on the brink of nuclear war is "in control," so I won't waste more time on alleging the opposite. Just ponder what you are thinking. Just remember that all forms of control cease at the margins of control. (I worked in weapon systems.) Airplanes go out of control too often, but total control is an impossibility. Nothing is more precarious of "control" than human affairs. If you keep things away from the real "brink," then maybe you can pull it off. How "real" is that brink, then?
And, by the way, as for forks in the road---the evidence so far is that the majority will pick the wrong side. How does that get us safe from the precipice?