So what you are saying sounds pretty much like 2020 BLM riots. Lets assume it was put on overdrive. Maybe 10 times more rioting than BLM.
First problem - it is barely a precipice. Like you said, a precipice needs to feel like you are going to die (and being someone who was obsessed with heights when I was young, I have seen more than my share of precipice) and this would just get everyone angry, but nothing like near death.
Second problem - No way a BLM rioting will be organized as long as Trump is not optically in Office. The precipice is something the enemy has to take us to - to ensure the people understand just how serious they were about killing/enslaving us all. So unless it comes from their side, it does not serve for Great Awakening.
When I say a percipice that is completely under the control of the White Hats, dont imagine a precipice with guard railes and everyone gets to look over and say "Wow, so deep".
No, the precipice I am talking about is like one from an Indiana Jones. You are thrown off the edge. You are falling. You are in mid air. You are saying your prayers (yeah even the atheists lol). Then just before you hit the ground, as if by a miracle, a netting appears below you, and you are saved.
Financial precipice - you lost your money. You are literally starving for a few weeks. You see people going berserk around you.
Netting - The new multi polar financial system comes to rescue, just before most people would have starved to death.
Nuke in the air - I envision a fake story of a nuke from Russia. Maybe even a fake story of a city destroyed. The whole city is cordoned off, no communications, no internet, no phones, no overflights, no way for anyone to confirm if its real. A real nuke is launched in retaliation. Russia sets all their nukes on highest alert, and launches them.
Netting - Trump comes out as wartime CIC, and uses his "nuclear codes" to disarm our nuke. Russia disarms all their nukes. The destroyed city will be exposed as perfectly fine.
I know you dont care for the Financial Precipice - its not so much a precipice as an inevitability, and we can ignore it.
But tell me, do you think the scenario of Nuke in the air sounds like a near death experience? Does it sound like jumping off the cliff without knowing there is a netting. And that netting - the miraculous netting - comes from the most hated man by half the country, the one they were trying to put away for 1000 years.
I cannot imagine any other precipice as perfect as this for Great Awakening.
Scenario 2 is impossible. We do not provide the ability to disarm after launch for exactly the reason you want to exploit: vulnerability to electronic warfare. (The earliest ICBMs had radio command guidance, but that was replaced in the next generation by inertial guidance.) The nuclear codes are to authorize launch, not abort missions. Once missiles are launched, they are for keeps. They have no radio receivers. You really need to grip more reality when you want to postulate scenarios. (It may be possible to abort a bombing mission, but that hinges on command-and-control protocols. I wouldn't count on it.)
And what, pray tell, is the safety net for Covid-19 vaccinations? A lot of people are going to die a slow, unpleasant, ill-recognized death with no evident possibility of cure or remission.
You can believe (or imagine) a perfect precipice with no casualties. I prefer to expect a real one, with real casualties.
You really need to grip more reality when you want to postulate scenarios.
You never fail to turn a good debate into a personal attack. Not that I mind, since for me, it gives a clue into the state of the opponent's mind and their stance.
We do not provide the ability to disarm after launch for exactly the reason you want to exploit: vulnerability to electronic warfare
There are many ways to ensure a disarm code is not vulnerable to ECW including cryptographic solutions.
(The earliest ICBMs had radio command guidance, but that was replaced in the next generation by inertial guidance.)
I am not going to push this issue too far since I know it would be futile to make a person who believes they are expert in an area to think outside the box. But remember that Q has shown us that technologies exist outside of public knowledge. Here is one example regarding the interception of the missile in Hawaii:
We also dont have to be limtied to "abort codes". It could any number of possibilites to sell this scenario, including interception.
And what, pray tell, is the safety net for Covid-19 vaccinations?
Safety net does not mean no real casualties. Of course there will be real casualties, especially in the financial precipice area.
That said, all those who are injured and suffering from the vaccines, who survive the shorter term issues, will most definitely have access to anti-covid-vaccine technologies after the precipice. If we assume that covid vaccines are bioweapons, then it is quite possible that an antidote for this weapon was created along with the weapon.
I prefer to expect a real one, with real casualties.
Your scenario of a impending civil war did not really include real casualties except "occasional gratuitous murder". Does not sound much like a real precipice with real casualties.
It also brings up the question of how much real casualties do we need to see at this precipice to ensure Great Awakening happens, while also not destroying the psyche of the humanity beyond repair? And how do you ensure the casualties remain within this acceptable range, if as you claim, the precipice will be with no controls?
Have it your way. I have only worked in strategic defense for decades and I am familiar with what is or is not done. Those missiles cannot be aborted, and that is a fact. They picked inertial navigation expressly to preclude that possibility. Why would anyone want to gamble with it? You simply do not know what that world is all about.
There was no missile intercept in Hawaii. That was a reference to the presumed rogue launch of a missile from Puget Sound, near Kitsap Peninsula. That would have been a possible boost-phase intercept by an F-15 flying combat air patrol over the submarine base at Keyport, I happen to be especially familiar with that technology. (If it had been, however, the sight and sound of the intercept would have been a matter of public note, and there was no record of such an event.)
So, no safety net. At least you are clearing your eyes.
But wishful thinking about a "cure" for the vaccine damage, which is latent at the genetic level. A vaccine for the vaccine? How are we to trust that?
Oh, "casualties" would not include hundreds of murders (killings by mass violence)? Sweep them under the rug, will you? There is no way to ensure that casualties will remain within an "acceptable range." I don't believe in an acceptable range (but evidently, you do). My whole point is that the premise of "control" is ill-conceived and points to events more serious than what we have experienced already. (Unless they have ready access to the equivalent of a fire extinguisher, such a speedy mobilization of the National Guard.)
The idea that people will have their "psyche destroyed beyond repair" is fatuous nonsense. People have survived the devastation of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, airplane crashes, and volcanic eruptions (e.g., Mount St. Helens), and no one has worried about their "psyches destroyed beyond repair." People are tough and resilient. Nobody likes to go through an extremity of pain and suffering, but they go through it. (Ever had open-heart surgery? No fun during recovery.)
You have a thin skin. Giving needed advice is not a "personal attack." I have thought "outside the box" enough to have been granted 9 patents on new ideas (sadly, others were not elected for patent protection by my employer). Indeed, do not push it too far, because a person who is not an expert in an area often does not know where the box is.
And here I was just starting to enjoy what was promising to be a nice debate. But its okay, have learnt not to expect too much from people intellectually.
So what you are saying sounds pretty much like 2020 BLM riots. Lets assume it was put on overdrive. Maybe 10 times more rioting than BLM.
First problem - it is barely a precipice. Like you said, a precipice needs to feel like you are going to die (and being someone who was obsessed with heights when I was young, I have seen more than my share of precipice) and this would just get everyone angry, but nothing like near death.
Second problem - No way a BLM rioting will be organized as long as Trump is not optically in Office. The precipice is something the enemy has to take us to - to ensure the people understand just how serious they were about killing/enslaving us all. So unless it comes from their side, it does not serve for Great Awakening.
When I say a percipice that is completely under the control of the White Hats, dont imagine a precipice with guard railes and everyone gets to look over and say "Wow, so deep".
No, the precipice I am talking about is like one from an Indiana Jones. You are thrown off the edge. You are falling. You are in mid air. You are saying your prayers (yeah even the atheists lol). Then just before you hit the ground, as if by a miracle, a netting appears below you, and you are saved.
Netting - The new multi polar financial system comes to rescue, just before most people would have starved to death.
Netting - Trump comes out as wartime CIC, and uses his "nuclear codes" to disarm our nuke. Russia disarms all their nukes. The destroyed city will be exposed as perfectly fine.
I know you dont care for the Financial Precipice - its not so much a precipice as an inevitability, and we can ignore it.
But tell me, do you think the scenario of Nuke in the air sounds like a near death experience? Does it sound like jumping off the cliff without knowing there is a netting. And that netting - the miraculous netting - comes from the most hated man by half the country, the one they were trying to put away for 1000 years.
I cannot imagine any other precipice as perfect as this for Great Awakening.
Scenario 2 is impossible. We do not provide the ability to disarm after launch for exactly the reason you want to exploit: vulnerability to electronic warfare. (The earliest ICBMs had radio command guidance, but that was replaced in the next generation by inertial guidance.) The nuclear codes are to authorize launch, not abort missions. Once missiles are launched, they are for keeps. They have no radio receivers. You really need to grip more reality when you want to postulate scenarios. (It may be possible to abort a bombing mission, but that hinges on command-and-control protocols. I wouldn't count on it.)
And what, pray tell, is the safety net for Covid-19 vaccinations? A lot of people are going to die a slow, unpleasant, ill-recognized death with no evident possibility of cure or remission.
You can believe (or imagine) a perfect precipice with no casualties. I prefer to expect a real one, with real casualties.
You never fail to turn a good debate into a personal attack. Not that I mind, since for me, it gives a clue into the state of the opponent's mind and their stance.
There are many ways to ensure a disarm code is not vulnerable to ECW including cryptographic solutions.
I am not going to push this issue too far since I know it would be futile to make a person who believes they are expert in an area to think outside the box. But remember that Q has shown us that technologies exist outside of public knowledge. Here is one example regarding the interception of the missile in Hawaii:
u/#q1730
We also dont have to be limtied to "abort codes". It could any number of possibilites to sell this scenario, including interception.
Safety net does not mean no real casualties. Of course there will be real casualties, especially in the financial precipice area.
That said, all those who are injured and suffering from the vaccines, who survive the shorter term issues, will most definitely have access to anti-covid-vaccine technologies after the precipice. If we assume that covid vaccines are bioweapons, then it is quite possible that an antidote for this weapon was created along with the weapon.
Your scenario of a impending civil war did not really include real casualties except "occasional gratuitous murder". Does not sound much like a real precipice with real casualties.
It also brings up the question of how much real casualties do we need to see at this precipice to ensure Great Awakening happens, while also not destroying the psyche of the humanity beyond repair? And how do you ensure the casualties remain within this acceptable range, if as you claim, the precipice will be with no controls?
Have it your way. I have only worked in strategic defense for decades and I am familiar with what is or is not done. Those missiles cannot be aborted, and that is a fact. They picked inertial navigation expressly to preclude that possibility. Why would anyone want to gamble with it? You simply do not know what that world is all about.
There was no missile intercept in Hawaii. That was a reference to the presumed rogue launch of a missile from Puget Sound, near Kitsap Peninsula. That would have been a possible boost-phase intercept by an F-15 flying combat air patrol over the submarine base at Keyport, I happen to be especially familiar with that technology. (If it had been, however, the sight and sound of the intercept would have been a matter of public note, and there was no record of such an event.)
So, no safety net. At least you are clearing your eyes.
But wishful thinking about a "cure" for the vaccine damage, which is latent at the genetic level. A vaccine for the vaccine? How are we to trust that?
Oh, "casualties" would not include hundreds of murders (killings by mass violence)? Sweep them under the rug, will you? There is no way to ensure that casualties will remain within an "acceptable range." I don't believe in an acceptable range (but evidently, you do). My whole point is that the premise of "control" is ill-conceived and points to events more serious than what we have experienced already. (Unless they have ready access to the equivalent of a fire extinguisher, such a speedy mobilization of the National Guard.)
The idea that people will have their "psyche destroyed beyond repair" is fatuous nonsense. People have survived the devastation of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, airplane crashes, and volcanic eruptions (e.g., Mount St. Helens), and no one has worried about their "psyches destroyed beyond repair." People are tough and resilient. Nobody likes to go through an extremity of pain and suffering, but they go through it. (Ever had open-heart surgery? No fun during recovery.)
You have a thin skin. Giving needed advice is not a "personal attack." I have thought "outside the box" enough to have been granted 9 patents on new ideas (sadly, others were not elected for patent protection by my employer). Indeed, do not push it too far, because a person who is not an expert in an area often does not know where the box is.
And here I was just starting to enjoy what was promising to be a nice debate. But its okay, have learnt not to expect too much from people intellectually.